|
As they come of age,
children of NAC members
eventually decide
to try to stay awake
for an entire service
and ingest
an "adult" amount
of peyote.
Such a rite-of-passage
typically occurs
somewhere between
age 10 and 14,
but children do attend
these meetings
in their younger years
before fully participating.
IN LATE NOVEMBER, 2002 I found myself sitting in a small Michigan Circuit Court
testifying pro bono as an expert witness in a child custody case revolving around the
sacramental use of peyote. This Court's family judge in a prior divorce decree had forbid-
den a father from offering his religious sacrament, peyote, to his 4-year-old son. The
father, Mr. Jonathan Scott Fowler, is a member of the federally-recognized Grand Traverse
Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, and his son, Ishkwada, with 25% Native Ameri-
can blood quanta, is also eligible for tribal enrollment. Mr. Fowler was awarded full
physical custody of his son and did not accept that a judge could forbid he and his son
from expressing their faith together like other Native American Church (NAC) families.
The father turned to the Michigan State Court of Appeals, which decided that the decree
against Mr. Fowler's religion should have had a hearing on the merits of the sacramental
use of peyote. And so, the case landed right back before the very same family judge who
handled the divorce.
Mr. Fowler is a member in good-standing of the Native American Church of the
Morning Star, which was founded (according to the Judge!) in the late 1800s in Michigan.
The taking of the sacrament, peyote, is central to the services and prayer meetings of the
NAC. Though peyote and its psychoactive constituent, mescaline, are listed as Schedule I
drugs of abuse, millions of peyote "buttons" are legally distributed and consumed across
the United States each year by the 300,000 members of the NAC. The NAC, in fact, is the
largest single denomination amongst Native Americans.
Mr. Fowler simply wished to do as any other proud father might by bringing his son
to meetings and have him blessed with the "medicine." Much has been misunderstood on
this issue, which is critical to grasp: we are talking about a very small amount of ground-
up peyote or a small sip of peyote-infused tea being placed on the son's lips. This father
wasn't seeking to "intoxicate" his 4-year-old boy, nor would he responsibly permit his son
to just unwittingly eat away at peyote as if it were candy. Peyote is revered and respected
by members of the NAC. It also has a bitter, acrid taste that precludes being mistaken for a
delicious food. As they come of age, children of NAC members eventually decide to try to
stay awake for an entire service and ingest an "adult" amount of peyote. Such a rite-of-
passage typically occurs somewhere between age 10 and 14, but children do attend these
meetings in their younger years before fully participating. They stare wide-eyed at the
fireplace in the center of the tipi or traditional house and listen carefully to their elders'
words. Some play make-believe drum in time with the beat of the peyote songs being
accompanied by water-drum. Perhaps these children will be given a blessing by being
touched with peyote, such as a small amount rubbed on the forehead, or by a very small
"taste" placed in their mouth. Eventually, these children fall asleep behind their parents
or grandparents until morning. And while these children sleep, the road chief and other
congregants will offer blessings over their sweet little bodies. This is part of the NAC
traditions and is how their faith carries forward into the future.
It should have been enough for this Court to hear from a road chief (the "pastor" who
leads the all-night prayer ceremony of the NAC) that the father was only seeking to bless
his son in "that right way," which is customarily accepted and approved by the majority of
NAC members. I was present because, sadly, we have a court system that fails to fully
respect the traditions and customs of Native Americans; and so, instead, the Court needed
to hear a medical expert weigh in on this issue of allowing a child to ingest peyote. Now
mind you, this issue has already been settled by Act of Congress: the 1994 Amendments
to the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) became law expressly to protect
these religious rights of all Native Americans who are members of federally-recognized
tribes. Such individuals cannot be excluded from the bona fide practices of the NAC, but on
the fault-lines of divorce, the need to uphold federal law appears to crumble in the name
of "child protection." And so, as the only American
scientist to conduct research on health consequences from
lifelong peyote use (now or historically), I offered my
expert testimony in the 27th Circuit Court, Family
Division of the State of
Michigan before Judge
Graydon W. Dimkoff for
an NAC father fighting for
the religious freedom of his
family.
Despite the absence of
any evidence of harm,
despite the passage of
AIRFA, despite my clear
testimony, Judge Dimkoff
issued a ruling months
later stringing together a
patchwork of inaccurate
assessments about the
NAC use of peyote. With
an elected judgeship, I
suspect the Honorable
Dimkoff was more inter-
ested in getting to his
predetermined conclusions
that are in-line with his
electoral base, than in
actually sticking his neck
out to uphold the Constitu-
tion and protect the
religious rights of one
father and his young son.
Family Court Judge
Dimkoff failed to appreci-
ate what the NAC stands
for and how it functions.
He rightly noted in his
decision that a surrogate
can ingest peyote for another in special circumstances, but
then used this point to continue his injunction against
Ishkwada being fully blessed with peyote. He apparently
thought that by forcing a surrogate upon Mr. Fowler and
his son he did not burdened their practice of religion! The
fact that a surrogate can be used in these NAC ceremonies
was used as a "loophole" by this Judge to support his
decision, but this decision continues to be an obvious
burden upon this family: they are the only Native family
in America now to have a judge tell them that they can't
exercise their religion consistent with the accepted
traditions and faith of the NAC.
Judge Dimkoff's 31-page decision is also filled with
mistakes about peyote itself, and about my research. My
catalog of them with my comments can be read in an
expanded version of this article at www.maps.org/news-
letters/peyotechild.pdf.
It really gets under my skin that Americans in
positions of responsibility would abuse our Constitution
and the principles upon which this nation was founded
and disparage the protected beliefs of a people who have
suffered so much since
their world was "discov-
ered" by Europe. Jonathan
and Ishkwada Fowler are
not the first Native
Americans to be so dearly
wronged by people who
claim that they are there to
protect and help them. In
fact these actions remind
me of an old sick saying of
past advocates who were
calling for the complete
acculturation of Native
Americans into "accepted"
society: You've got to kill
the Indian to save the
man. Fortunately, the
Judge's decision does
permit Ishkwada to be
present at NAC ceremo-
nies. I think the future is
quite bright for this family
since federal law is on
their side. Eventually,
Ishkwada will be a fully-
enrolled member of the
Grand Traverse Band of
Ottawa and Chippewa
Indians just like his Dad.
Eventually, Ishkwada will
express his wishes. And if
it is his wish to partake
fully in the ceremonies of
the NAC, he will be allowed to do so with the consent of
his parents or after future litigation in federal court.
It appears that our culture is so hysterical when it
comes to the topic of "kids and drugs" that it influenced
this Judge to run in fear from his obligations, and it
resulted in major media coverage around the globe. The
sacramental use of peyote by Native peoples has contin-
ued for thousands of years and is not going to stop, so we
might expect another case like this one sometime in the
future. Next time around, we should all make sure people
really have read the current American Indian Religious
Freedom Act (the on-line edition of the MAPS Bulletin
reprints AIRFA in its entirety). Also, my research on the
neurocognitive functioning of longstanding NAC mem-
bers will also finally be published soon, and science can't
be ordered by Judge Dimkoff to accept his opinions as if
they were peer-reviewed facts.
|