ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to express my thanks to a number of persons who
helped to make this book possible.
First, I wish to thank Leo, wherever he may be, for his devoted
interest, skill and determination in carrying out this very
important work under stressful conditions, guided by his faith
and confidence in the value of what he was doing. My wife Jean
and I are most grateful for the patience and care that he took
to communicate to us his knowledge and experience.
I am also grateful to those who participated in Leo's
program, making this work possible, and particularly to those
who shared in detail the experiences that they underwent
and the results that followed. I also thank Leo's family and supporters who
aided him in carrying out his work.
I wish to thank Ann and Sasha Shulgin for pointing out to
me the importance of getting Jacob's efforts recorded.
My thanks to Terence McKenna for permission to use his
title for this book.
I am extremely indebted to Rick Doblin, Sylvia Thyssen,
Brandy Doyle and MAPS for their assistance in the editing and
completion of the manuscript, and for taking the steps to have
the manuscript published.
I wish to thank my wife Jean for her assistance and loving
support throughout all stages of this project, from the initial
interviews to the completion of the final manuscript.
INTRODUCTION TO THE SECOND EDITION
THE SECRET CHIEF was published seven years ago, and has
now been sold out. Reprinting a new edition provides the opportunity
to make some fresh observations, as well as report new progress
in the utilization of psychedelic substances. Moreover, the passage of time permits a
new development: The Secret Chief no longer needs to be kept
secret!
While doing his important work, which our government
held to be illegal, Leo lived constantly under the possibility of
being discovered and prosecuted as a criminal. Many of those
close to Leo who supported his work also lived under the threat
of exposure. Even family members feared harassment or investigation. Leo died over seventeen
years ago, and the threat to his
supporters and companions has evaporated. His family members no longer object to the
revealing of his name, and share in
the belief that it is time for Leo to receive the acknowledgement
he deserves. So we are pleased to present Leo Zeff, Ph.D., the
Secret Chief! In this edition, we include photographs of Leo and
new accounts written by his son and daughter, as well as new
reports taken from interviews with his clients.
Since the last edition, we have new reasons to hope that the
healing techniques Leo pioneered may reach more people. Most
promising is the action of the FDA in approving three projects
investigating the efficacy of psychedelics as tools for therapy,
the first such action in over thirty years. In addition, a number
of new, informative books help clear up widespread misunderstanding of the nature and
potential of psychedelics.
It has now been 24 years since my wife Jean and I interviewed
Leo. What a marvelous experience this was for the both
of us! Leo was a remarkable friend, full of life and wisdom and
good cheer. It was a true joy to spend many hours with him
as he
reviewed his work with us. Turning my attention to once again
consider his contribution, I feel a deep emptiness in his absence.
And yet as I look over what he shared, I cannot help but
be
immensely grateful for his outstanding contribution.
Still, I am saddened at how a most priceless gift, the psychedelic substances,
especially in the hands of Leo and others
like him, has been completely denigrated by our government.
The enormous potential for healing, for self-discovery, and for
communion with the Divine has been prohibited. Those who
would pursue such valuable goals can do so only by becoming
criminals, as our current laws forbid possession of such substances.
But there is hope. There is a deepening spirituality growing
in our nation, and spirituality is a powerful aid to healing. Many
extremely worthwhile books are appearing. Some of these pertaining specifically to how psychedelics
can help have been added
to the "Resources" section at the end of this book. And as mentioned
above, the FDA has approved three projects authorizing
research with psychedelic substances to evaluate their effectiveness for therapy. One project involves
the application of psilocybin in the treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Another
is employing MDMA in the treatment of Posttraumatic Stress
Disorder (PTSD), and a third employs psilocybin administered
to advanced cancer patients to relieve anxiety, pain and fear of
death. These projects have evolved as a result of anecdotal evidence from underground
therapists and users, as well as from
previous psychedelic research from thirty years ago. Successful
outcomes from these three projects could well open the door to
more extensive research.
In the meantime, it would be most helpful if government
officials and the public were better informed of the remarkable
potential that psychedelics hold for healing, learning, self-development, and authentic spiritual understanding.
In general, the DEA and government agencies have feared widespread abuse and
damage from such substances. It is true that uninformed or misdirected use of
psychedelics can be harmful. The government must
certainly take some responsibility for this situation, as
criminalizing these substances has prevented important knowledge for harm reduction and beneficial uses
to be made available.
However, for a realistic evaluation of the risks, a
number of issues should be taken into account:
- There are large numbers of users who have learned to
use psychedelics properly for their own personal gain, encompassing the range from increased
enjoyment or improved functioning to the heights of spiritual development. Many knowledgeable therapists
are willing to break the law rather than withhold valuable treatments with these
substances from their clients.
- A minor percent of the population are at risk of developing unhealthy relationships
with psychedelics due to personality
disorders or other pre-existing psychological conditions. They
are often incapable of comprehending the consequences of their
actions, including abusing drugs. This minority will always be a
problem until we devise better ways to care for them.
- A fairly large percent of young people live in painful
circumstances, in poverty-stricken, abusive, or neglectful families. For an illustration of the drastic
effects that lack of intimacy can produce, look at the work of Rene Spitz on the Internet
at http://www.hofmann.org/papers/spitz/index.html. The unhappiness of such youngsters lead them to explore almost any
avenue that will provide them with a period of enjoyment, regardless of the
circumstances or aftermath. Prohibition, however, will
not solve the problems faced by these young people. In fact, legalization would
make vital information more available, and
knowledgeable guides would begin to appear, which in time
would reduce misuse.
- The use of psychedelics is self-regulating in most cases.
Their true purpose is to enhance growth and interior development. Used only for
pleasure, or abused, the Inner Self is thwarted,
which leads to unpleasant experiences and depression. Though
everyone who pursues the use of psychedelics for personal growth
must be prepared for the "dark night of the soul" experiences,
those who seek only entertainment will lose interest in these substances. A good
example comes from the book The Pursuit of
Ecstasy, by Jerome Beck and Marsha Rosenbaum, which reports
on a study funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse
(NIDA). "Chapter 5 -- Limits to Use: Why People Moderate or
Quit Ecstasy," covers a number of factors why people reduce or
drop their use of Ecstasy (MDMA) over time, based on a large
sample of interviews conducted with a broad spectrum of users.
It must be recognized that despite the action of our government to make
psychedelic substances illegal, huge numbers of
people have found psychedelics so useful that they are willing to
break the law in order to use them. It is hoped that such
users
can obtain valuable information from this book that will reduce
abuse and promote true healing, growth and wisdom. The combination of successful research
results and the growth in public
recognition of the vital role of psychedelics in healing and personal development, should
ultimately restore these enormously
valuable tools to our society. Then the dedicated pioneering work
of Leo Zeff will be fully recognized and appreciated.
PROLOGUE
After the publication of the first clinical paper on LSD by Walter A.
Stoll in 1947, Albert Hofmann's serendipitous discovery of the psychedelic effects of LSD
became practically an overnight sensation in the world of science. Never before had
a single substance held so much promise in such a wide variety of
fields of interest.
For neuropharmacologists and neurophysiologists, the discovery of LSD meant the
beginning of a golden era of research that could solve many puzzles concerning
the intricate biochemical interactions underlying the functioning of the brain.
Experimental psychiatrists saw
this substance as a unique means for creating a laboratory model for naturally
occurring psychoses, particularly schizophrenia. They hoped that it could provide unparalleled insights into
the nature of these mysterious disorders and open new avenues for their treatment.
LSD was also highly recommended as a unique teaching device that would make
it possible for clinical psychiatrists and psychologists to spend a few hours in
the world of their patients and as a result of it to understand
them better, be able to communicate with them more effectively, and improve their
ability to help them.
Early experiments with LSD revealed its unique potential as
a powerful tool offering the possibility of deepening and accelerating the psychotherapeutic process,
as well as extending the range of applicability of psychotherapy to categories of
patients that previously had been difficult to reach such as alcoholics, narcotic drug
addicts, and criminal recidivists.
Particularly valuable and promising were the early efforts to
use LSD psychotherapy with terminal cancer patients. These studies showed that LSD was
able to relieve severe pain, often even in those patients who had not
responded to medication with narcotics. In a large percentage of these patients, it
was also possible to alleviate or even eliminate the fear of death, increase
the quality of their lives during the remaining days, and positively transform the
experience of dying. For the historians and critics of art, the LSD experiments
provided extraordinary new insights into the psychology and psychopathology of art, particularly various
modern movements as well as paintings and sculptures of native cultures.
The spiritual
experiences frequently observed in LSD sessions offered a radically new understanding of a
wide variety of phenomena from the world of religion, including shamanism, the rites
of passage, the ancient mysteries of death and rebirth, the Eastern spiritual philosophies,
and the mystical traditions of the world.
LSD research seemed to be well
on its way to fulfilling all the above promises and expectations when it
was suddenly interrupted by unsupervised mass experimentation of the young generation and the
ensuing repressive measures of a legal,
administrative, and political nature. However, the problems associated with this development, blown out
of proportion by sensation-hunting journalists, were not the only reason why LSD and
other psychedelics were rejected by the Euro-American culture. An important contributing
factor was also the attitude of technologized societies toward non-ordinary states of consciousness.
All ancient and pre-industrial societies held these states in high esteem and they
devoted much time and energy trying to develop safe and effective ways of
inducing them. Members of these social groups had the opportunity to repeatedly experience
non-ordinary states in a variety of sacred and secular contexts. Because of their
capacity to provide experiential access to the numinous dimensions of existence and to
the world of archetypal realms and beings, non-ordinary states represented the main vehicle
of the ritual and spiritual life of the pre-industrial era.
They also played
an essential role in the diagnosing and healing of various disorders and were
used for cultivation of intuition and extrasensory perception. By comparison, the industrial civilization
has pathologized non-ordinary states, developed effective means of suppressing them when they occur
spontaneously, and has rejected or even outlawed the contexts and tools that can
facilitate them.
Because of the resulting naivete and ignorance concerning non-ordinary states, Western
culture was unprepared to accept and incorporate the extraordinary mind-altering properties and power
of psychedelics. The sudden invasion of the Dionysian elements from the depths of
the unconscious and the heights of the superconscious was too threatening for the
Puritanical values of our society. In addition, the irrational and transrational nature of
psychedelic experiences seriously challenged the very foundations of the world-view of Western materialistic
science.
The existence and nature of these experiences could not be explained in
the context of the mainstream theories and seriously undermined the metaphysical assumptions on
which Western culture is built. For most psychiatrists and psychologists, psychotherapy meant disciplined
discussions or free-associating on the couch.
The intense emotions and dramatic physical manifestations
in psychedelic sessions appeared to them to be too close to what they
were used to considering to be psychopathology. It was hard for them to
imagine that such states could be healing and transformative and they did not
trust the reports about the extraordinar y power of psychedelic psychotherapy. In addition,
many of the phenomena occurring in psychedelic sessions could not be understood within
the context of theories dominating academic thinking. The possibilities of reliving birth or
episodes from embryonal life, obtaining accurate information from the collective unconscious, experiencing
archetypal realities and karmic memories, or perceiving remote events in out-of-body states,
were simply too fantastic to be believable for an average professional.
Yet those
of us who had the chance to work with psychedelics and were willing
to radically change our theoretical understanding of the psyche and practical strategy of
therapy were able to see and appreciate the enormous potential of psychedelics, both
as therapeutic tools and as substances of extraordinary heuristic value.
In one of
my early books, I suggested that the potential significance of LSD and other
psychedelics for psychiatry and psychology was comparable to the value the microscope has
for biology and medicine or the telescope has for astronomy. My later experience
with psychedelics only confirmed this initial impression. These substances function as unspecific amplifiers
that increase the energetic niveau in the psyche and make the deep unconscious
dynamics available for conscious processing. This unique property of psychedelics makes it possible
to study psychological undercurrents that govern our experiences
and behaviors to a depth that cannot be matched by any other methods
and tools available in modern mainstream science. In addition, psychedelics offer unique opportunities
for healing of emotional and psychosomatic disorders, for positive personality transformation, and consciousness
evolution.
Naturally, tools of this power carry with them greater potential risks than
more conservative and far less effective tools currently accepted and used by
mainstream psychiatry, such as verbal psychotherapy or tranquilizing medication. However, past research has
shown that these risks can be minimized through responsible use and careful control
of the set and setting. The legal and administrative sanctions against psychedelics did
not deter lay experimentation, but they did terminate all legitimate scientific research of
these substances.
For those of us who had the privilege to explore the
extraordinary potential of psychedelics, this was a tragic loss for psychiatry, psychology, and
psychotherapy. These unfortunate developments wasted what was probably the single most important opportunity
in the history of these disciplines. Had it been possible to avoid the
unnecessary mass hysteria and continue responsible research of psychedelics, they could have become
a tool that would make it possible to radically revise the theory and
practice of psychiatry.
This research would have brought a new understanding of the
psyche and of consciousness that could become an integral part of a comprehensive
new scientific paradigm of the twenty-first century. Most of the LSD researchers grudgingly
accepted the legal and political sanctions against psychedelics and reluctantly returned to mainstream
therapeutic practices. A few attempted to develop non-drug methods for inducing non-ordinary states
of consciousness with the experiential spectrum and healing potential comparable to psychedelics. And
then there were those who, like Jacob, the "Secret Chief," refused to accept
legal sanctions that they considered irrational, unjustified, or even unconstitutional.
These researchers saw the extraordinary benefits that LSD therapy offered to their clients
and decided not to sacrifice the well-being of these people to scientifically unsubstantiated
legislation. In addition to the therapeutic value of psychedelics, they were also aware
of the entheogenic potential of these substances -- their capacity to induce profound
spiritual experiences. For this reason, they understood their work with LSD to be
not only therapeutic practice, but also religious activity in the best sense of
the word. From this perspective, the legal sanctions against psychedelics appeared to be
not only unfounded and misguided, but also represented a serious infringement of religious
freedom.
Jacob painfully weighed the pros and cons and made the decision to
challenge the law, continue his work with psychedelics, and assume personal responsibility for
his activity. He has already passed the judgment of his "family," the friends
and clients whose lives he has profoundly changed. They remember him with great
love and gratitude. It remains to be seen how he will be judged
by history. It is certainly wise to obey the laws if our primary
concern is personal safety and comfort. However, it often happens that in retrospect,
history places higher value on those individuals who violated questionable laws of their
time because of foresight and high moral principles than those who had issued
them for wrong reasons.
Stanislav Grof, M.D.
Mill Valley, California
FOREWORD
Hardly any other science is as conservative and traditionbound as is medicine. Whenever
a new treatment modality or an extraordinary medicine appears, in addition to interested
acceptance in specialist circles there is also opposition to the novelty, which is
emotional and vehement, in proportion as the innovation is significant and pioneering. Hypnosis
may be cited as an example. It was denounced as dangerous charlatanism, and
more than a century had to pass before it gained entry into mainstream
medicine.
Today a novel group of psychoactive substances, which have come to be
known under various designations -- hallucinogens, psychotomimetics, psychedelics and recently entheogens -- has evoked violent controversy in
professional circles and the media. These are substances capable of profoundly affecting human
consciousness. This explains the vehemence and the
passion which accompany discussions of the `psychedelics,' as these materials are mostly known
today, since we are talking about the veritable inner core of our humanity,
our consciousness.
On the other hand, one would imagine that the psychedelics
might have gained especially easy entry into medicinal practice, since we are
dealing here with active principles of drugs which for millennia have played a
meaningful role in archaic cultures and which even today among primigenial peoples find
beneficent application in social and medicinal fields. Had we from the outset harked
back to these archaic experiences, we would have been able to avoid the
misuse and improper use of these extremely potent psychopharmaceuticals, and they would not
now be prohibited, but would rather have become valuable medicines in the contemporary
pharmacopoeia.
The substances under discussion are above all mescaline, the active agent of
a Mexican cactus which the Indians call péyotl or peyote; psilocybin, the active
principle of the Mexican `magic mushrooms' teonanácatl; and LSD (chemically Lysergsaure diethylamid or
lysergic acid diethylamide), which is closely related to lysergic acid hydroxyethylamide, the active
agent of the ancient Indian `magic drug' ololiuhqui.
All of these drugs are
integrated into tribal cultures and employed as `magic medicines' in a religious-ceremonial context.
Their use is in the hands of shamans or shamanesses, male or female
priest-doctors, where they manifest a beneficent action. They are esteemed as sacred, and
according to Indian belief, their misuse or profanation is punished by the gods
with insanity or death. International research with these substances--especially in psychiatry, to
investigate their use as pharmacological adjuncts to psychoanalysis and psychotherapy -- commenced shortly after the
1943 discovery of LSD, which is by far the most potent representative of
the psychedelics. Besides the greatest enthusiasm in response to outstanding results with LSD
and other
psychedelics, scepticism also manifested itself in conservative circles, particularly those in which any
pharmacological intervention in the treatment process was rejected.
This very promising use of
psychedelics in psychiatry and psychology came to an untimely end midway through the
sixties, when this new class of pharmaceuticals was outlawed, with the complete prohibition
of their manufacture, possession and use. Accidents involving psychedelics resulting from frivolous, uncontrolled
use in the drug scene were the ostensible reason for this prohibition. The
principal reason for the draconian prohibitive measures, however, was the goal of attacking
the youth movement, hippies and the like, who opposed the Establishment and the
Vietnam War, and whose `cult-drug' was, above all, LSD.
Medicinal use of the
psychedelics was prevented by the official prohibition, and further research in this field
was interrupted, while consumption continued in the drug scene. This irrational situation still
largely exists today (1). For therapists, the use of psychedelics became a criminal matter,
for which they could face punishment.
One of the probably very few therapists
who continued to use psychedelics, accepting the great risk of criminality, was the
psychologist here referred to by the alias `Jacob' and dubbed the `Secret Chief'(2).
Jacob had obtained mostly excellent results from his speciallydeveloped techniques in the
use of psychedelics, and he realized that this therapeutic method should not be
withheld from sick people. His ethical obligation as a therapist, to help people,
took priority for him over obedience to a dubious official prohibition.
In the
illegality of his time it was unthinkable to publish the excellent results of
his therapy. It is therefore praiseworthy that today, nine years after his death,
a friend has undertaken
the task of publishing the details of the therapeutic methodology of this intrepid
Ph.D. psychologist. The therapeutic results attained from this method constitute an important argument
in the current growing discussion challenging medical circles, whether again to liberate psychedelics
for psychotherapeutic practice.
Albert Hofmann, Ph.D.
Rittimatte, Switzerland
Translation from German by Jonathan Ott
INTRODUCTION
It is rare in life to meet a person so engaging, so warm,
so obviously kind that your heart automatically goes out to him at first
contact. Jacob was such a person. Completely unpretentious, he was tremendously enthused with
life and excited about people.
Jacob died in the spring of 1988 at
the age of 76, after an unusual and illustrious career. He was outstanding
in his field, and made many significant contributions. Yet because of the unorthodox
character of his chosen work, he was little known outside his immediate circle
of friends and clients. In fact, I cannot even use his correct name,
nor give you the locale of his activities. Yet if he and his
work were truly known, the world would recognize that it has lost one
of its most able pioneers and a man who has made a very
important contribution to the field of psychology. A close and knowledgeable friend, who
had the opportunity to understand him better than most, dubbed him the "Secret
Chief," which is a most fitting title for this work.
It was in
the spring of 1981 when my wife Jean and I met with him
to have these conversations. He was already 70 years old, and retired from
his very engrossing work. He was a short man, about five feet six
inches tall, somewhat stocky, almost whitehaired, and hardly ever to be caught without
an engaging smile. As soon as you were in his presence you knew
that he was your friend, and would do anything he could for you.
He was proud of his Jewish heritage, and also proud of his service
in the army, where he attained the rank of Lieutenant Colonel.
Jacob was
a psychologist, and one of the first to be licensed as a Ph.D.
in the state in which he practiced. For many years he conducted a
private practice as a Jungian therapist.
Jacob's life changed dramatically in the early
1960s, when he became acquainted with the mind-altering substances LSD and mescaline. These
powerful drugs not only led him into a whole new area of self-understanding,
but he found them to be enormously effective in helping his clients--so much
so that he abandoned conventional therapy to pursue the study and practice
of using these new substances.
Jacob made great personal progress, and at the
same time learned a good deal about how to use these chemicals effectively.
He developed many useful procedures and had a large following of clients wanting
to take advantage of this new, powerful means of therapy.
In time, Jacob not only was responsible for processing around three thousand individuals, but he shared
his experience in this new art with over one hundred therapists. By the
time these conversations were held, he was responsible probably more than any other
individual alive for introducing individual clients and therapists to the benefits and procedures
of effectively using mind-altering substances in personal growth.
My purpose in interviewing Jacob
was to become familiar with the practices he had developed. There were many
of us who believed that his valuable techniques should be published and made
available to other researchers and for posterity. One huge, giant obstacle confronted us:
Most such substances had been placed in Schedule I of the Federal government's
Controlled Substances Act, making them illegal to possess. So there was considerable risk
of exposure in making such information public.
Jacob agreed to transmit the information
and have it on record, and we agreed that we would decide
later on its disposition. When the information had been reduced to writing, Jacob
decided that it was too sensitive to be published, so it was set
aside.
Now that he is no longer with us, and immune to whatever
legal transgressions he may have committed, it becomes possible to tell his story
and acknowledge the outstanding pioneering work that he accomplished.
Most of what follows
is in Jacob's own words. I have done some editing for the sake
of clarity, and have arranged some discussions in more logical progression. Also, appropriate
fictitious names and locations have been used with an eye to our repressive
drug laws. Many of the very promising substances Jacob worked with are in
Schedule I, making it exceedingly difficult to research their beneficial uses (1).
The decision
to use Jacob's own words took much pondering on my part. Several who
have seen the initial form of this manuscript felt that Jacob's uninhibited language
and looseness of expression would turn many potential readers away, and they preferred
a more scholarly, professional rendition. But those who knew Jacob will delight in
once more experiencing his expressions, fondly recalling past conversations and the images of
this dear person they invoke. Such expressions may likely be lost on readers
who never knew this man, and who could very well object to the
sometimes coarse language.
But this gets to the very heart of some of
the misunderstandings about psychedelics.
Jacob was a man who brought new life and
opportunity to many hundreds of individuals, often in total life-transforming ways. He was
dearly loved. This was not because of his elegant expression or professional training.
It was because he was blessed with an abundance of heart, the most
necessary prerequisite for someone accompanying others into the depths of their very souls.
For the unconscious mind is often terribly frightening; we have made much of
its contents unconscious because we want nothing to do with it. It takes
a strong heart, honesty, and a desire to learn and face one's problems
in order to enter the dark areas of our suppressed inner self.
Nothing is more helpful than the presence of a kind, loving, understanding person thoroughly
familiar with the dark regions of the mind--a companion who is confident of
his ability to help one navigate and resolve those regions that have been
an enormous burden in the past, a person who knows the wonder of
being free.
Whoever understands all of this certainly is not concerned about the
person's modes of expression, but is only grateful for the heartfelt support.
And
this Jacob expressed in abundance. A person who felt deeply, he understood that
expressing such feelings is the most honest way of being oneself. It is
not the choice of words, but the ability to feel deeply and genuinely
express one's feelings that make one authentic, and which brings people together in
true relationship. Since so many of us are afraid of our feelings, the
dark side of our unconscious is replete with feelings we do not dare
to feel. Once we learn how to find and express them, we can
feel the delight of being fully alive by honestly expressing them. Then we
deeply appreciate those who function this way.
So in submitting Jacob in his native tongue, I feel that I avoid
the disservice of not fully presenting him. I very much hope that the
reader, through encountering Jacob's personal expressions, can more readily discern the heart of
one of the truly great persons who have lived on this earth. Yes,
it's probably true that a man with a Ph.D. in psychology might have
learned to speak more correctly, but once you have the privilege of being
in this man's presence, who cares?
May you enjoy this introduction to our
good friend and psychedelic guide par excellence, Jacob.
Myron J. Stolaroff
Lone Pine, California
1. The Drug Enforcement Administration, which initiated the scheduling of practically all psychoactive
materials, claims that placing the substances into Schedule I does not preclude research.
While there is a procedure for researching Schedule I materials, in practice for
almost three decades, virtually no clinical research was permitted on this class of
substances. The control is exercised by the Food and Drug Administration, which must
grant an IND or Investigational New Drug exemption to permit research. For Schedule
I materials, a protocol must be submitted and approved by the FDA. At
the time of these interviews, numerous applications for IND's for psychoactive materials had
been turned down. Beginning in 1990, there has been a liberalization of this
policy. In 1997, there are several research projects with psychedelic substances that have
been approved by the FDA and the DEA.
EARLY BEGINNINGS
Jacob: What I was hoping was that you would be able to prepare
questions -- I work better in response to a stimulus rather than just
talking out of my head.
Myron: How did you first get into the
use of psychedelic agents?
Jacob: I think it was in 1961, something like
that. One of my former patients called me and said, "Jacob, I want
to see you. I want to talk to you about something." I said,
"All right." She said, "I want to tell you about an experience I
just had. I can't talk to anyone else about it because I don't
think they'd understand it." So I said, "Sure. Come on in."
She came
in and sat down and told me that she had recently had an
LSD trip. She told me about her experience, and I was fascinated by
it. She felt that I was the only one who could understand it
because I was Jungian. I had training as a Jungian analyst and I
was doing Jungian analysis at that time.
Well, I was just amazed at
this experience, just flabbergasted, because, my God, here I'd been working over 30
years in various disciplines and studies and meditations and all that kind of
stuff and every now and then getting a glimpse of the truth on
an experiential level. Here, this gal comes in and tells me she dropped
this minute quantity of material and she had a solid day of nothing
but all those beautiful peak experiences that people will get out of it,
and tremendous insights and many growth things and all that. I was very
surprised. Didn't do anything about it, particularly. I asked her some questions, but
I knew that there was nothing that you could even question about it.
You just listen to it and get what she's saying. I got a
contact high from her, though! (He laughs heartily.)
About three or four months
later another person, a man whom I had worked with earlier, called me.
He said "Jacob, I've got to talk to you. I've got to see
you about something." I said, "Fine, come on in." He came in and
he sat down and he told me he had just had an LSD
experience. Well, he told me about his experience, and it was every bit
as spectacular as the other one that I'd heard from the lady. Then
I really got interested. Not only that, I wanted to find out how
the hell I could get into something like that!
I decided to look
into it. I had some friends here, and they were into it and
knew a lot about it. I wanted to get some information about this
stuff for myself. One of them had Sandoz's annotated bibliography of every article
that had come out that had been printed until then, and he let
me read it. There was something like 1,000 different references, all phases of
psychedelics and a paragraph digest of many of the articles. I read that
through from the beginning to the end and was very, very impressed because
of the tremendous potential that was pointed out from the material in terms
of the experience that people had from it. It was mostly LSD and
psilocybin. All the tremendous great things they said about it and what came
out of scientific journals.
There were only two or three references to something
bad. Those mostly were because somebody gave it to somebody without telling them
what it was or under the wrong circumstances. I believe one of them
was when they gave it to a nurse in a hospital while she
was on duty. She didn't know what was happening. She freaked out and
jumped out the window, down about seven stories, something like that, and killed
herself.
Then I really got serious about exploring. One of the first things
I did was find out who's doing it. One of the first places
I found out who was doing it was a place set up for
just this purpose. I found that out because one of their staff came
to give a talk to some psychologists. He talked about the LSD. I
met him; that's the first time I ever met him. We had a
talk, and he got to r ealize that I had a great interest
in it. He's the one that told me about their place. I went
down to visit them and he showed me around, told me things, and
gave me the idea of the setup.
I found out other people who
were working with it at that time. We had a meeting of people
who were interested in it and did a lot of talking about its
potentials, shared experiences that people had and all of that. Then there were
a couple of other places that I went where people knew things about
it. In fact I went to a meeting where Aldous Huxley spent an
evening with us telling us all about it. He had a place for
tripping in Mexico, a health resort. I went down there once for a
trip with another therapist and her group.
When I was so interested and
fascinated by it someone whom I don't remember any more said, "Jacob, why
don't you try it? Find out what it's all about?" I said, "I'd
love to, but I don't know where to get it or who to
talk to." He said, "What're you talking about? All these people, any one
of them, could give you a trip."
I knew someone who was interested in these materials. I was talking to
him and asked him if he knew anyone who was willing to give
me a trip. He says yes, he knew where I could get a
trip and he told me about a fellow who was doing this work.
This guy arranged one for me with him and his wife. So I
went over there and had a trip. Didn't have much; didn't take much.
I get a full trip out of 100 micrograms acid. They gave me
the acid, and I took it, and -- nice circumstances, very pleasant, secure. Then I
start to turn on. I lay down on a kind of divan that
they have there and we played some music and as I r eally
started to turn on, they started to turn on.
I remember that the
first thing I said was, "Why can't it be like this always?" It
was a very deep, emotional trip. He asked me to bring some things
along that were important to me, and I brought my Torah. I have
my own Torah in its ark. Someplace along the line he was playing
Kol Nidre, I think. He laid the Torah across my chest and I
immediately went into the lap of God. He and I were One. That
was -- (feeling strong emotion). I can't remember all the different things. What happened was
another thing I said out loud -- he copied down what I said out loud -- I
use tape recordings to catch what people say -- I said, "Jacob, if ever again
you are frightened you deserve the pain of the fear because you will
have forgotten that God is with you and protecting you all the time."
As I was coming down I had some pictures that I brought along
-- pictures of my family -- pictures of my father and my brothers and my
mother. The outstanding experience there was, I looked at pictures of my father
and my brothers and myself as I was a little boy -- and we all
were the same person, all of us. There was no difference between us.
I looked at the picture of my mother that I had there and
it came alive and I took hold of her hand and we walked
through a forest glade or something like that. And I told her -- I can
cry again, my God -- I told her all the different things that I'd never
been able to tell her in my life. Just told her what they
were! And she listened to them all, she heard them, she did not
respond yet we were communicating beautifully. There were other things that happened on
the trip, but now I'm going to stop and go to another point.
The space that I was in at the time that I tripped -- I was
just in the beginning of the late forties -- the 50 year crisis that people
have going into the second half of life. I see it more as
the time when you really get into the spiritual search. I was pretty
damned depressed and pretty well ridden with anxieties which are characteristic of that
stage. I was dissatisfied with myself, dissatisfied with my work as an analyst.
While I was aware of the value of the work I was doing,
I was more acutely aware of its limitations. Having the people come in
once a week -- I never did see people more often than once a week,
maybe twice a week if they were in a crisis -- and talking and talking
and having hit the desert space, the dead space of life where nothing's
happening. And listening to them talking and talking, trying to get out of
it working with dreams and all that and nothing happening, and realizing God-damn,
Jacob, there's nothing you can do except wait until life comes along and
gives them a big kick in the ass and they get going again.
Nothing's going to happen from me except to be there to listen and
to support them.
Well I was in that kind of a space myself,
not knowing what to do, where to go. I could only do what
I could do; I tried different solutions, but they didn't work. I read
books, I read about spiritual things, about God and all that. I got
value from it, but it didn't get me out of where I was,
actually.
One of the things on the trip that occurred to me was,
Jacob, this is the answer you've been looking for! If something like this
can do this to you, then -- well, I don't know if I filled it
out other than saying well, my God, this can jar people loose, this
can break people through, this can do all kinds of things. Look what
it's doing for you.
I decided then to explore it much more thoroughly. I wanted more trips,
to have more experience, to develop it more. I had to find people
who had material, that I could get them to sit with me. I
remember being with -- oh, he was a physician -- he was exploring the materials, and
I wanted to try grass. He said all right, come by the house
here, and I'll have some grass for you and we'll turn on. Well,
I was smoking cigarettes in those days. He laid out some joints for
me and told me how to inhale it and hold it and all
that and so I started to smoke the grass. I smoked it like
cigarettes. I inhaled a big drag, held it in my lungs as long
as I could and blew it out, then inhaled another one. I did
that through two and a half joints, and this was good stuff.
What happened was I really freaked out. I got paranoid as hell! I was
lying down on the couch there after I had finished a piece. The
agony of the damned went on and on and on such as can
happen. Paranoid as hell! Scared to death of everything. If the phone rang
I knew it was the police coming in and there was nothing I
could do but just give myself up and all that kind of stuff.
It was torture! It was a horrible bummer; I had never had a
bummer like that in my life until then.
Myron: Were you alone?
Jacob:
No, he was there. Some place, about two to three years into it,
he came by and put a dish down by me and I picked
up my eye and looked at it. I didn't know what it was.
I picked up my eye a couple of years later and looked at
it and it was some ice cream, with a spoon. He said, "Have
some ice cream, Jacob; go ahead."
I picked it up and I took
a spoonful of ice cream. I never tasted such ambrosia in my life!
It was the exact opposite experience of what I was having. Heavenly! I
ate and ate and ate for I don't know how many years. Every
bite was so beautiful! Finally I licked the spoon and I licked the
bowl clean. I put i t back down, laid back on the couch,
and went right back into the bummer!
It took quite a while for
me to come down from it, and I did. That was my second
trip. I had some other trips that were very nice. I can't remember
specifically now. I did have mescaline; that was good, very spiritual, very nice.
I took acid some more. Two very interesting and important experiences I had.
One was with an experienced psychiatrist, let's call him Louis. Let me see
if I can remember what the hell I had then. I think it
was an acid trip. I remember I was smoking at that time, I
was smoking a pack and a half a day, which is a lot
of cigarettes. I was having problems at home with my wife, and was
pretty unhappy then in my home life. On this trip I was talking -- I
was coming down from it, somewhat -- and I was talking to Louis about things.
He had asked me questions to get me to talk, and I was
talking about Jane. I was saying something about the problems that I was
having with her. I couldn't talk to her, I couldn't relate to her,
she was very frightened about anything that I was doing and very paranoid
about me. Very jealous, absolutely no reason of any kind at all. I
used to have migraines in the early days, but more than anything else
what bothered me the most was the fact that she smoked, constantly. And
I'm allergic to cigarette smoke. I was telling him that. I was telling
Louis, "See. I can't stand cigarette smoke." Louis looks at me and I'm
sitting there with a cigarette in my hand. I say, "I'm allergic to
smoke, to cigarette smoke."
He says, "You're allergic to smoke?"
I said, "Yes."
He looks at the cigarette and looks at me, and looks at the
cigarette, and I look at the cigarette, too. I'm still pretty stoned. I
looked and looked and looked for a long, long, time, I looked at
that cigarette. Hours, just looked at it. Many things were going through my
mind. Louis says to me, "Well, if you're allergic to cigarettes, are you
going to stop smoking?"
After a long pause, I don't know what time
it was, but I responded. I said, "That's the wrong question, Louis. The
question is not, am I going to quit, the question is, have I
quit?" I watched that cigarette burn down to the cork tip in my
fingers, and I stuffed it out. And I've never smoked a cigarette since
then. I was never able to. I had tried to stop many times,
you know how you try to stop. I've never smoked a cigarette since
then.
There's another incident, too, an experience in my home that I had
that was a very important one. I've had migraines all my life. The
earliest memory I have of myself is lying on the front porch of
my house at home while they're paving the street and the tar was
there as they were paving the street and bricks as they used in
those days and the tar smell was making my head ache so bad.
That's the earliest experience I had. About three, maybe four years old. The
headaches were extremely severe and painful. Pretty bad constantly.
One day I was
tripping in a group trip. I was having an ibogaine trip. Do you
know ibogaine? It's a fantastic medicine, really. I think I mentioned that
we use the word medicine rather than drugs.
You get the answers to
all your questions on this trip, on the ibogaine trip. Everything is clearly
stated, any questions you have. You go into the trip with questions if
you want to. You ask the question but you don't try to answer
it. The answer comes to you. This time I decided to ask Mr.
Ibogaine -- we call him, the person from whom you get the answer, Mr.
Ibogaine. Anyway, my question was, what is this with these headaches that I
have, that I suffer from? That's all. I was really turned on and
deep in a trip and the question occurred to me. Okay, ask it.
"What is it with these headaches?"
The answer came. I've had a number
of ibogaine trips and the answer always comes. You may not recognize it
for what it is, it may be very ambiguous or somewhat like that,
but you've got the answer for sure, you'd better hang onto it. The
answer came back and said, "You're going to die." I looked, and I
said, "What?" That's what it said. I know it said it. I looked around
it, and it said I'm going to die.
You don't get frightened with
an experience like that. You just take whatever's handed to you and look
at it, handle it. So I looked at it, and I looked at
it and I said, "Jesus Christ, what does that mean, I'm going to
die? Well it means you're going to die, that's all it means." Die
when? Of course I knew I'm going to die some day. I know
that, that's nothing new. This isn't the kind of "You're going to die"
that Mr. Ibogaine was saying.
I said, "Well, gee, this is something between
me and Mr. Ibogaine. It is not something that I can tell anybody
about." On the report of my trip -- we all gathered the next morning and
told what happened on our trip -- on the report of my trip, I could
not say anything to them about Mr. Ibogaine's saying I'm going to die,
since that would scare the hell out of everybody. They wouldn't know how
to take it.
I didn't know how to take it. I never did
know. I kept reflecting on it for quite some time. And it was
about a month later. The only relief I could ever get for migraine
was codeine. And I took one helluva lot of codeine. I was certainly
habituated, but not addicted because there were times I wanted to quit taking
it, and I decided I was going to quit. I did quit; I
quit for weeks, and I could do it! Without too much trouble. And
my migraines would be easier on me even then. But then I'd get
back on it again. I was taking as many as four to eight
half-grain tablets of codeine every day, so that I could function without the
pain.
A month after this trip I took another trip. I don't remember
what the material was. It wasn't ibogaine. I was with somebody, I can't
remember who it was, I don't even remember if it was a man
or a woman. I took something, I think it was acid, and had
my trip. As I was coming down from the trip, as most of
the people liked to do and as I always wanted to do, I
walked down to the water. I walked along the water, which was a
very important place for me. That's where I had my greatest conversations with
God. That was really a very important thing to me. I remember walking
along, talking to God, and coming back up to the house. As I
was coming up the hill something flashed in my mind, something that was
a result of the space I was in from the trip. What flashed
in my mind was a phrase.
I know that when lots of times
you take an ibogaine trip you get something that's enigmatic, you don't know
what it is, and later on you'll get something that fills it in.
Completes the sentence is really what it does. It turns out that "You're
going to die," was part of a sentence. The second part of the
sentence flashed into my mind. "Unless you stop taking codeine."
I rolled that
one around and rolled it around and rolled it around and looked at
it. God-damn! How can I function, unless I take codeine? I just played
around with it a lot. Maybe I haven't got the right message, or
something like that. Then I said, "No, Jacob, don't fuck around with this
stuff. You know the answer. You take it. You got the right message.
Take it, just as you got it. I'm going to die unless I
stop taking codeine. Okay, I got the message. That's the truth, I know
that's the truth. So, what am I going to do about it? Am
I going to quit taking codeine? It doesn't bother me to die. I'm
going to die some day. But -- I'm not ready yet. I don't want to,
right now. Am I going to quit taking codeine?"
And it flashed in
my mind the answer, this statement. "Jacob, that's the wrong question. The question
is not `Are you going to quit taking codeine?' The question is, `Have
you quit taking codeine?'" The same thing that happened with the cigarettes. And
I knew the answer. Right then and there I knew the answer. I
had quit. I had quit. For a long, long time. My migraines got
less and less. Occasionally they would get real strong, I would take some
for a little while. But it was over with. I was over taking
it as I used to. Well as you can imagine, that was a
very spectacular thing in my life.
Those are personal incidents. Some of the rough times that I went through.
Then I got some other people interested. In fact, some of the people
I used to work with -- I was doing groups then, too -- I was telling
people about my experience and they all got excited and interested and said,
"Hey! I'd like to do that!"
Fine! Somebody had said to me at
one point, "Jacob, you should be doing this. You'd be a natural at
this kind of thing."
I said, "Who me? I can't do that kind
of thing. That'd be too big a responsibility. I wouldn't know how to
handle it."
But this person whom I knew very well wanted to have
a trip and I made the arrangements and I gave her a trip
and she had a fabulous experience. And that was the beginning. Several people
wanted to have a trip. But after a dozen or so had had
a trip they were complaining because there was nobody they could talk to
about it. Look, you couldn't talk to anybody about it. They wouldn't understand
it, they'd think it was a terrible thing or something. So I said,
"Fine, let's have a meeting at my house. Everybody who's tripped, we all
get together and talk about our trip." We did that several times. They'd
talk about it, we enjoyed it very much and one day somebody said,
"Jacob, why don't we all take a trip together?" Somebody suggested I should
be doing group trips, too.
I said, "What?" They were all clamoring about
it. So I said, "Okay, we can try it once. We can all
spend a weekend together and we'll have a trip."
There were ten or
twelve of us. We had a little ceremony developed and plenty of preparation
and security, and I stayed straight. I only let them take 50 micrograms
of LSD because I didn't know what the hell was going to come
from it. Well, a few of them turned on a little bit. Not
very many of them did turn on. But I wasn't going to go
any further that time. After it was over we talked about it and
had a good time for the weekend, but not much happened.
I decided we'll do it again, only next time I will give them
their base amount which I knew from their individual trip. They'd all had
individual trips with me. Then we'll see what happens. We did that again
about a month later and that was a fantastic experience. That began the
whole program of group tripping.
There's the individual trip and the group trip.
The evolvement is something I would like to be able to describe. There
was so much that went on. It was all experimental, all exploring, everything
that we did. We tried this, we tried that, in terms of what
went on during a trip. First, I want to go into the development
of the individual trip.
In the early days, whenever I had an individual
trip, I always had a physician present. He would come in and see
the person first and check them out. It was just a procedure that
I wanted to explore and see what was necessary and what wasn't. This
was mostly for my own feeling of security in case anything happened. He
was present the first couple of hours of every trip. These trips were
all done in my office. I had a folding bed that I put
up and went through a lot of preparation with them first. I explored
different things. I read everything there was about what was important to do
in preparation for a trip. I tried a lot of them.
A physician
worked with me a lot. He liked to work with people throughout the
whole trip. I started to do that and then very gradually did less
and less of it, until finally I did not work with them except
at a point when they wanted me or needed me. He explored on
a psychoanalytic basis. He used that model which I couldn't use. It was
not my model.
It was less than a year that my doctor
friend would come into the office. After that I didn't need anybody. I
knew I didn't need anybody. In fact, it was better not to have
him. He would try to do some work with the person which
was anti what I was doing.
In the beginning I worked with the
people on trips -- I can't describe what the work was right now. I helped
support them in turning on. They got frightened, you know? I'd hold their
hands or I'd hold them in my arms and tell them to go
ahead, experience it out. I would talk to them in advance about this
so that they would know that this was available.
Most of them were
blissful trips, but if somebody got frightened with the transition point between one
stage of consciousness and the other I would prefer to be close to
them. At times I would ask what they were experiencing. If they were
in pain or something like that I would ask them to describe the
pain, where it was, and go into it. If it was a pain
in the stomach, I would say, "Okay, now, think about opening your mouth,
and going down into your mouth and describe what you see. It's dark,
it's this, that, and keep on going. Describe what you see as you
go down. Go all the way down, into your insides." Frequently they would
burst into a beautiful world of paradise. The pain would immediately be transformed
into ecstasy. Something like that would happen. I tried many different things. As
they were coming down from the trip we would talk, and they would
talk about where they'd been. You can't talk much, you know, until you're
coming down.
Also there was physical contact. It was important in those days
that they would have something to resist before they turned on. Or as
they were turning on. They were having trouble turning on -- I'd tell them first
that this might happen -- I would lie down on top of them, grab the
edge of the bed and say, "Now what I want you to do
is push against me." I want you to know, I hung on for
dear life. I said, "Push harder, harder, harder!" And they did. When they
succeeded in getting me off they were through to the other side! Their
report of what happened as a result of that and later what they
experienced was just a fascinating thing.
One of the things I had everybody
do that I tripped was after or as soon as he or she
could sit down and make notes of
whatever he or she could recall -- write up the whole thing -- for themselves, and for
me.
Myron: Did you keep copies of these reports?
Jacob: I kept a
file of these reports, but some years ago, the file got thrown out.
Of all the trips -- I had hundreds of them -- they would have made a
good book themselves.
The screening process and the preparation process: we talked a
lot. I had them go through a lot of rituals for themselves --
fasting, learn how to do some fasting. I had certain things that I
had them read, spiritual literature that was very illuminating and they were able
to get it.
Myron: Do you have a few favorites along those lines?
Jacob: Not any more. Not any more, I don't. I don't suggest readings
any more, because the people that come to me have gone through a
lot of things in terms of reading, and they're ready for something besides
reading.
Myron: I'm thinking in terms of people who are just looking into
this, and looking for some helpful ways to get started.
Jacob: Very little
that I've come across I would recommend. Aldous Huxley's Doors of Perception and
Heaven and Hell, those certainly are ones. Those are the only things I
found that were important. I used to give a lot of reading, but
that didn't make any difference. This experience is such a very different dimension.
They left it all behind very quickly. It did not help in getting
them prepared. Their greatest help was their contact with me -- talking and
experiencing. For the most part the people that I do now are people
who make a big difference in the world, with people. They're therapists and
psychiatrists, physicians, they're government people who have very high positions and great influence.
Myron: I've always had this dream that you could somehow bring this about,
yet we have never succeeded at that at our Foundation (the International Foundation
for Advanced Study in Menlo Park, California).
Jacob: They didn't give you the chance.
Myron: I don't know; we brought
a lot of stuff on ourselves. We were pretty immature.
Jacob: Of course.
I look at the progress I made down through the years and the
different changes that I made as a r esult of my experience -- I can't
recall them all but I continually changed my procedures and my thinking about
it and my ideas about what happened and what could happen; how to
set situations so that you get the best possible setting and so that
they could get the best possible trip. The most useful trip for them.
Some of the rough things that I went through on trips -- the roughest
of all is they get paranoid and run away. That's scary as hell
until they are located. They see me as the devil. No matter what
I say to them the devil is trying to destroy them. If I
try to get them to take some niacin, which is supposed to bring
them down, that's poison. They won't touch it. No way. Or a sedative
or whatever. I learned not to do that; I learned to screen better.
I could sense after a while whether a person was likely to get
paranoid on a trip, or violent, or something like that. And I was
alone on all this.
This was such a fascinating thing to be doing!
I didn't have to do much of anything at all except provide the
opportunity and the material and then to see the fantastic results! The transformations
that came in all of those people. It was really something. We went
on, I kept on doing it, one or two a month.
SELECTION AND PREPARATION
SELECTING THE CLIENT
Myron: What would you look for when you screened? What were the
characteristics that were important to avoid?
Jacob: I screened very carefully. I'll try
to tell you what my screening process was. A lot of it was
based upon experience. Not knowing at first who was a suitable candidate for
the kind of trip I did under the circumstances I set up, I
would offer to trip people who weren't suitable. As a result I had
some pretty paranoid trips. That's extremely painful to go through, to stay with
them until they finally come down. Even though afterwards they said it was
the most fantastic experience they ever had in their life. It changed their
whole life. That always happened when they had those paranoid trips. Painful experiences,
weeping, listless; I was very encouraged when they could go through this. One
of the things I learned about tripping very early was that we get
in touch with feelings we've never been able to experience before and at
a depth and a level that we've never been able to reach. That
could be fear, it could be love, it could be ecstasy, it could
be anything. Just as long as it's feelings--sadness, grief. Lots of times they
would start to cry on a trip and cry for the longest time
so deeply. To me it seemed so satisfying because they were getting something
out. I liked that.
I learned to watch out for my motivations for
wanting to trip somebody. To make sure that--I don't know what word would
be suitable here--I use the word pure, but it's not the word I
want. Clean. That I wasn't doing it for self-aggrandizement or something like that.
I learned very early that I am an instrument. I do not
bring this experience to anybody. I provide them with the opportunity; they have
the experience. They bring their own experience to themselves, and I have the
privilege of sitting with them while it's going on.
Myron: I think I've
picked up an awful lot of junk sitting in sessions. I was so
inexperienced and I'd never been trained as a therapist and I used to
get so tired. I'm sure it was my selfinvolvement--I wanted to do something
for somebody.
Jacob: To try to help them. I very soon learned that
my traditional techniques of helping people in therapy do not work, they just
don't work. Just leave 'em alone! They know what the hell's wrong with
them or the God within them knows what's wrong with them and provides
them with whatever they need which I don't know anything about and they
don't even know anything about. They don't know what their real needs are.
All they know is what their wants are. That's true for all of
us, of course. (Laughs.) Just how you know you have a good candidate
is very difficult to describe. I've tried to relate this many times. I've
tried to teach. It's nothing you can teach. Only your experience will give
it to you. My intuition was the most important thing, and my stomach.
My stomach would respond to something that was not right. Something they would
say--or just being with them, no matter what they were saying, because I
couldn't trust what they were saying as being them. It isn't them, what
they were saying. I would get a vague feeling of anxiety that would
stay with me after I had talked to the person and certain questions,
certain things that they had said would come to my mind. I would
just look at them. Then I would talk to them again a time
or two and see if I wanted to proceed more along the exploring.
Always I told them this is exploratory until I was r eally sure
I wanted to trip with them and they were really sure that they
wanted to take the trip. Then we would arrange for the trip and
do some preparation.
Myron: Would you describe it as you would have to
feel a certain kind of bond with them?
Jacob: Yes. I would have
to have that feeling that I would r eally like to trip this
person. Other factors besides those subjective ones: How much work they have done
on themselves in terms of their own individual growth. How long they've been
working on themselves. What training they've had. What workshops they've gone to. What
readings they've done. What they feel they've accomplished. How far they've gone and
what their complaints were about themselves in terms of inadequacies, like, "I know
all the things in my mind, but I want to get them in
my heart." I can tell in getting their history if they're searching, how
far they've gone, how much of it has sunk in. When I get
the feeling that I'm really interested in this person, like, "Oh, boy, a
trip would do just exactly what they want, what they're asking for!" Then
I knew this was o.k. If I didn't get that kind of thing
I wouldn't stay with them longer or I would say no, I don't
think it's time yet. I had to turn down people very seldom because
before they even get to me there's always a selective process going on.
They are referred by somebody who knows me and has tripped with me
and has worked with me. Before they even get to know who
I am or get to see me this person will call me and
tell me, "You know, here's so-and-so that I would like to refer to
you for a trip."
I would say, "Well, tell me about the person."
They would tell me a lot of things--how well you know them, do
you trust the person, a lot of questions. Questions are what you want.
"What do you know about the explorations that they've made already? You know
that we are spiritually oriented. Are they also interested in that and oriented
in that?" They know these are questions I'm going to be asking, so
that the people that are referred to me are already screened by them
as good candidates. It might be the spouse of somebody that has tripped,
too. A boyfriend or a girlfriend of somebody or a colleague or somebody
who is on the search with them.
In other words they know
this person. They've already screened them. The person really wants to have a
trip. They know that. They just don't know where to go or how
to go and they've heard what great things have come from them, and
what great things have happened to the person that is making the referral.
They're close, in some way. They'd like to have that happen to them,
too.
Then the referring person calls me, because no one can ever give
out my name without prior clearance from me. They call me, I get
all the information. I say, "Yep, it sounds okay. Tell them to call
me and I'll set up an exploratory with them."
And that's what happens.
Very rarely do I have to turn anybody like that down. Very rare.
Although sometimes I don't have the right feeling about the person and I
know that the person who referred them doesn't know much about them, r
eally, but just believes they might be a good candidate. That one I
would turn down.
There are these particular questions, some of them I've mentioned
that I think of now that I would ask them or explore with
them in terms of their state. What their expectations are. What they'd like
to get from such an experience. I used to see them six, eight,
ten times before I would decide. Not any more. One visit is all
I need. One visit with the person for me to experience them and
to get the feeling, "Yeah, this is one I really would like to
trip." Or for them to get to experience me, for that's very important
to them. The feeling of trust that they have in me is extremely
important. How do they feel about me? When it turns out that we
really make a connection, that's all there is to it, we arrange a
trip. No more than that. All the circumstance surrounding the trip, that I'll
be talking about some place along the line, too.
So, it's mostly based upon the experience that I've had already and it's mostly a
feeling and an intuitive process which I don't see operating, I just see
the results which come in my willingness to relate to a person.
Myron:
Are there certain kinds of presenting problems which are a factor, like certain
kinds of difficulties that a person has that make it a more difficult
situation or is it more just a feel of the individual?
Jacob: You
see, the point of presenting symptoms, specific problems that they want to have
dealt with, doesn't come into the picture. There are no symptoms, really. They
just say, "I would like to have this kind of experience because I
want to grow, as so-and-so has been doing. I want to get the
kind of religious experience that can come out of this thing. That's what
I'm looking for."
They will come in, and I'll ask, "What do you
want to take a trip for?" Then they'll tell me what's going on
in their life that they're dissatisfied with, that they'd like to come to
terms with, that they'd like to change. They have lots of anxieties, worried
about things--they're not getting along well with their job, with their boss, with
their wife, with their family, colleagues or friends or whatever or they've got
complaints, presenting complaints. It's not the kind of thing that you find when
somebody comes in for therapy and they give you a list of their
neurotic symptoms
or something like that and that they want to have changed. Sure they
want change. Many of them have already gone far enough to learn that
it's not the outside that needs changing, it's the inside that needs changing
and this is the approach that they want to take for changing the
inside. Because when you change the inside what you see outside is different.
Myron: So the people you work with would generally be far more growth-oriented
than what the usual therapist works with.
Jacob: Mostly, yes. Every now and
then somebody comes from some part of the country that is a person
who is referred by somebody whom I've trained out there who does a
lot of tripping, too.
Myron: Would it appeal to you if somebody had
some unusually tough problem that they were unable to get anywhere w i
th in therapy and they thought that maybe this procedure might be a
breakthrough and might be helpful? Would that kind of a case interest you?
Jacob: That's a familiar thing. They say, "I've been working on this for
a long time and I haven't been able to get any place with
it. Maybe a trip will help me break through it." I've heard this.
It could be a specific thing or it could be a general condition
that they talk about.
Myron: Most people have a resistance to therapy. They
don't like the idea that something's wrong with them and that they've
got to go for help. In another case it might be the
expense, or whatever, so usually before a lot of people will go into
therapy there has to be some really tough problem. Maybe they've got colitis,
or maybe they have a serious marriage problem or they know they have
a very difficult relationship and maybe they've worked in therapy for a long
period of time and haven't seemed to get anywhere. They seem to be
really blocked.
Jacob: I see what you're saying. A number of people like
that were referred to me and referred by people who know them and
know their history. And I say, "Look, I can tell you about
something that very possibly may help you break through on this."
Myron: To
focus on this issue, maybe they're not even interested in spiritual growth but
they just really have a serious problem.
Jacob: Oh, yes, that's right! I
never mention the word spiritual to them unless they bring it up. I've
had many people, I mean many people who've come to me who have
been in analys i s for a long time. Some have been in
analysis four times a week for eight to ten years continuously. They said
they had gotten a lot out of it. However, there was always something
that they never could get to. They have taken a trip and in
one trip afterwards have said, "I got more out of that one day's
experience than I did in my whole eight or ten years or whatever
of psychoanalysis." I've done that numbers of times.
CLIENTS WITH PREVIOUS PSYCHEDELIC EXPERIENCE
Here's another one that happens a lot. People will come to me who
have already tripped who want to have my particular kind of way of
tripping. One of them had tripped at least five hundred times on acid,
others who have tripped three, four hundred times, down through the early Sixties,
clear up to recent times. You know, plenty of trips their own way,
who've heard about people who have tripped with me and where they got
to so they want to have this kind of trip. We talk about
it, and they would be good candidates so I'd say, "Sure." They would
have their trip on acid. Invariably these people have said, "I've never had
an acid trip before in my life! This is the first time I've
ever really had an acid trip."
Myron: I'm real interested in that, because
frankly I've had a lot of resistance to Tim Leary and the tremendous
effort he made to make it so generally available. I feel that so
much of the potential has been missed by kids using it on their
own in the way they've used it. There's been a lot of self-gratification,
there's been a lot of pleasure experiences and a lot of what Al
Hubbard called "sharpening your wits" to reinforce "I'm right, you're wrong." I feel
by and large that not too many have seen the real implications. So
your experience here really interests me.
Jacob: Yeah. I would always ask them,
"Did you feel that you ever got any value from your previous trips?"
They would say, "I got some great insights from it." They would say
that in advance. But afterwards they would say, "No, nothing like what I
got this time."
Myron: I think that's really marvelous. It says a great
deal for you and your procedures. And it confirms some of my own
hopes in this area. Did you keep any kind of records where you
might be able to give some kind of a numerical assessment for this
sort of thing? Like, how many individuals came to you who had many,
many acid trips who arrived at this conclusion as a result of a
single trip?
Jacob: I didn't keep any records but I can give you
a fair estimate. Looking over more than 3,000 people who have tripped with
me individually and in groups I would say that between five and ten
percent have tripped before. That's on psychedelics, not just grass. Certainly five percent
have tripped; some a little bit, some a lot. It's those who have
tripped a lot--well they will all say that the trip they do with
me is very different, very different.
Myron: You can say that that's just
about universal?
Jacob: Yes. For those who have tripped before on acid or
any of the psychedelics or psychoactive materials even, except for grass. Yeah. Once
or twice a number of them--I can't recall now how many--have had very
bad trips and came to me to have a trip under these circumstances.
Usually where they were interrupted, and unable to get all the way
through it because somebody took them off to the hospital and they were
given Thorazine or some kind of shit like that. They didn't get a
chance to really complete it, to go through all the bad spaces that
they had to go through. They would come to me and we would
trip.
Under my circumstances I helped them through their fears so that when they
came out they were really reborn. That's Stan Grof 's whole model, that's
a rebirth experience. Transformation is rebirth and all that.
CLIENTS IN THERAPY
Myron: Do you think you can make an estimate of how many had
been in extensive therapy who as a result of a trip with you
found that they had made a really profound gain compared to the therapy
they had previously been in?
Jacob: Yeah. How many had been in therapy--a
lot of them. Let me see if I can say how many. Eighty
to eighty-five percent had been in therapy before. Some of them were currently
in therapy and wanted to have this experience. I want to come back
to that, so you remind me of that. Out of that eighty to
eightyfive percent, whatever it is, all of them said they got much more
out of their tripping.
Now, they're not putting down their therapy. In fact,
this experience illuminated the insights that they got from therapy but didn't get
very deeply. It validated their therapy. For many people, too -- I don't
know how many, it would be hard to estimate this -- it brought
them to the realization that they wasted all of their God-damned time; they
didn't get a thing out of therapy. They worked hard at it, stayed
long at it, many of them, labored at it, and thought there was
something wrong with them. In fact, they had just gotten with the wrong
person, that's all. If anybody came to me that was in therapy I
first stipulated I cannot bring you this experience unless you get clearance from
your therapist. There was an immediate screening process taking place. There were those
who said they couldn't do that, they just didn't want to tell him
about it.
I said, "That's quite a commentary on the relationship you have
with your therapist. I can't do this. I will not do it. If
you tell your therapist that you want to do this I need assurance
that he agrees that it's okay for you to do it. I'd like
for him to talk to me if he wants to." No, I stopped
doing that. I didn't want to be identified.
Myron: I was going to
ask you about the exposure.
Jacob: I want the therapist to know that
the person I'm talking to about this has already agreed not to reveal
my identity to anybody without prior clearance from me. That's the first requirement
I give to anybody.
Myron: So if they went back to their
therapist to get clearance they would say, "I've found somebody that's real good
to take a trip with," and the therapist asks, "Who is it?" They'd
have to say, "I can't tell you."
Jacob: Right away that would bust
up the relationship.
Myron: I can see where a lot of therapists would
really get on their high horse about that. On the other hand, were
there any who got to know you and would keep the trust and
even be willing to refer their patients to you?
Jacob: Most of the
therapists who would do that have tripped themselves. I always warned the person
who was in therapy that, "I want you to understand and realize that
it's quite possible that after you've had your trip you will terminate your
therapy." Invariably it happened. In a very few cases they could keep on
working with the therapist. They could do that if the therapist had tripped.
But you cannot trip and work with a therapist who hasn't tripped and
get any value out of it. You can't relate back and forth. You
can't trip as a patient and work with a therapist who has not
tripped because he has not had the experience and you cannot relate to
him about it. It ends up that I can only trip people who
are in therapy with a therapist who understands tripping and is willing to
refer.
Let me mention something about my original position when I first started
out. I had the traditional psychological or psychiatric attitude towards this stuff. This
is dangerous, this is bad, you shouldn't do it, and anybody who does
it is crazy, and all that kind of stuff. That was my position
in that regard.
There's no easy way to satori. You've got to work hard and you've
got to suffer. I was like the typical Christian who didn't have much
confidence in grace. Yet I knew what grace was. I did experience grace
many times. I had to overcome all of those prejudices first before I
could really explore honestly and openly. And of course my first trip dispelled
all my doubts. My own first trip. Since then there was never any
problem.
Myron: Would you care to say approximately how many therapists you have
provided the experience for?
Jacob: In all categories -- psychiatrists, M.D.s, psychologists, psychiatric social workers,
transactional analysis people, all the different schools that exist where people see patients
whether they're licensed or unlicensed, there's quite a spread of all of them--altogether,
a hundred and fifty. That's what comes to my mind. It's over a
period of fifteen years since I've been really doing it.
Myron: And these
are all people who would have a practice of their own where they
would be counseling others.
Jacob: Right. People-helpers--that includes nurses, physical therapists, people who
are very important to other people. At times I would get referrals from
them.
Myron: Of the roughly 150 people-helpers you have worked with, how many
are actually psychiatrists and psychologists?
Jacob: I would say about one-fourth. The others
are psychiatric social workers, family counselors, professional helpers like that.
Myron: Well gosh,
you've started a real significant movement here.
Jacob: (Laughs.) It extends very much
around the world, really.
Myron: It's been kept very, very quiet, it seems
to me.
Jacob: The selective process has helped with that. The security practices
that everybody's imbued with right from the beginning. That's what's important. I've been
able to function this way. Yes, it's underground, and all of that. I've
been able to function this way for all of these years because I
trust the people and they know about our security situation. A few people
have broken security. It has happened. Nothing has come from it, of course.
They've told somebody who tripped them.
SECURITY PROBLEMS
Myron: Security must have been
a terrible problem. Can you say more about what it's like to work
under such conditions?
Jacob: We were always security-conscious and we made everybody who
came in contact with us security-conscious. Most people were able to really be
ethically security-conscious and a few weren't. The few who weren't who talked about
it, maybe blabbed, talked unnecessarily or identified people -- no harm has ever come from
that.
You see, again, a spiritual trip is what's involved here. This I
have to say -- it's the only way I know how to talk about it --
what I do and even how I do it is not up to
me. I'm guided. I can't define that, I can't explain it. I know
that that's true. If I wasn't supposed to be doing this, and I've
said this before, I wouldn't be doing it. If God didn't want me
to do it He would have stopped me a long time ago. I
have a lot of faith that that's true. At the same time I
keep a close eye on my integrity and my security. Everybody else's security
is bound up in mine. We're all in it together.
I definitely have
suffered, I have suffered considerably with fears, what I call "just in case"
fears or "what if" fears. What if we're sitting there, laying there and
having a trip, you know, everybody's all laid out and stoned out of
their God-damned mind, their pupils are as big as saucers, and somebody knocks
on the door and it's the police raiding us. I don't know how
many times that's come across my mind. What if somebody died on a
trip? What if -- I don't know, all the "what ifs" that I had -- what
if somebody freaked out and ran down the street screaming? That happened!! Paranoia!
Everybody has it, I know, and I have it! If I hadn't been
doing this to be paranoid about, I'd b e doing something else to
be paranoid. It's only since I've taken the Course in Miracles that I've
gotten over my guilt and my fears. Many years and many times I'd
be in much agony falling asleep, and wake up in the morning and
have it hit me. That's true. I've looked at it and I've said,
"Jacob, for Christ's sake what are you exposing yourself to all this shit
for? You don't need it." Then I'd look and I'd say, "Look at
the people. Look what's happening to them." I'd say, "Is it worth it?
Is it worth going through all of this shit for that?" Inevitably I'd
come back with "Yeah, it's worth it." Especially at the end of a
weekend when I'd see what fantastic things have happened to these people. I
would say clearly to myself, "Jacob, it is worth it! Whatever you have
to go through. It's worth it to produce these results!"
Security has been
a terrible problem. It hasn't been a problem in that sense, but like
I'm describing now. What I've gone through because of fear of discovery. This
is a part of security. Actually, my worst fears in every situation have
been realized. I have said many, many times, whatever you are afraid of
never happens. And I know that's true. And yet sometimes the exact incident
that you're afraid of happening does happen. However, what you were afraid would
be the consequences did not happen. So what you're afraid of didn't happen.
That's happened in my life a number of times. Some of them have
been in connection with psychedelics, with what I'm doing.
There are those people
who know that I'm doing something. I believe they know the kind of
work I'm doing and know that it's under very good control and a
creative process. They don't bother me. They won't do anything to me. You'd
be surprised at the different walks of life people have come from for
tripping.
PREPARATION
I'll bring my analogies in here at this point. When I'm talking about
a trip to a person who hasn't tripped and they want to know,
"What's it like?" It's hard to describe what it's like but I have
a couple of analogies that I use.
One is, imagine that you're on
a stage, a very large stage, around stage, circular. You're standing
in the center of the stage. Around this stage is a huge curtain,
very, very high and it's closed and where the curtain comes together there's
about say three feet of space, of an opening. You're standing in the
middle of that stage and you're looking out through that opening. Everything you
see is the totality of your experience of yourself.
What happens on a
trip is by some mysterious means the curtain very gradually is pulled back.
Very gradually. It's pulled back until it's pulled all the way around the
back and you're given the opportunity to see everything that's been there all
the time but you couldn't see it before because there was a curtain.
All the different levels of experience that it's possible to have, you have.
All the different truths, all the different things, you have. You experience it.
Then, as you start to come down, very gradually the curtain gets
pulled back around until you're all the way down.
When you're all the
way down, the difference is that before, you had about three feet of
space that was open to look through. You now have about fifteen feet
of space. You have really expanded your awareness, which is what they call
these materials, awareness-expanders.
Myron: The curtain might have even gotten a little transparent.
Jacob: Yeah, (laughs), that was what I was going to follow with. In
addition to that you have a lot of memory of what you did
experience before. So in a sense that's true, the curtain has become almost
transparent. You don't remember everything, you don't need to remember everything. You don't
need to. You remember everything you need to remember.
There's another analogy that
I use, too. It's similar to that. That is, imagine a castle, a
huge castle, very large. Many rooms, many turrets, many levels of it. There's
only one way to get into this castle, and that's the front door.
The front door is solid steel. Impregnable. You can knock on that door
all you want. You can do everything you can to tear it down.
You can't get it down. Every now and then you might somehow or
other move it a little bit to get a glimpse of what's behind
it, but that's all. There's no way, and you've tried every way possible
to get into that castle. Which is yourself.
What happens on a trip
is by some mysterious magic means this door is dissolved, and you have
the opportunity to go in and explore that castle. Any place you want.
You go in and you look around, and you find many, many wonderful
places, strange places maybe, scary places and all that. You can go to
the top and you can go to the bottom and you get a
sense of what the totality of yourself really is like. As you come
down, what happens is that the door somehow or other gets back up
there. But that's all right, because you have a memory of what possibilities
are there and what you've experienced. The biggest experience that it brings to
you is that it connects you with feelings that you've never been connected
with before. They are now open to you. Not on the level or
the intensity that you had in the experience but certainly much more than
they ever were before. That gives them an idea. "My God!" they say.
"How soon can I have one?" (Laughter.)
Myron: God, Jacob, those are so
good. I think of places where I can use those analogies myself. Do
you have any objection if I use them?
Jacob: It's the greatest privilege
in the world for me to be able to share them, so if
they're of value to other people they're welcome to them.
Myron: One of
the problems that you run into is that very
often you get people who have rather powerful internal conflicts and it's really
difficult for them to confront them and they'll dodge and go off in
different directions. Did you ever do anything to try to encourage them to
confront that sort of thing? Similar to the way you described if it
manifested as a pain -- you had a beautiful technique for dealing with that. Did
you have some other techniques along those lines?
Jacob: Yes, yes. Whenever I
was aware of anything like that -- whenever they'd get really frightened -- I'd ask them to,
"Look at what you're afraid of, just look at what you're afraid of.
All you have to do is just look at it; don't do anything
about it, just look at it. Just keep on looking at it and
just tell me what you experience when you're looking at it." Most of
the times they'll go off into some kind of a visual trip. Experience
something. But they were not experiencing a specific block that you do experience
consciously. It wasn't that. It was a painful fear. That's what I had
them live with and stay with until it became transformed. As it did,
the block was gone. I don't think we even knew what the block
was. It was not a specific fear. It seemed to me at the
time that it was an accumulation of all the unfaced fears that was
being expressed at that time. By facing them they dissolved them -- to some degree
at least.
Myron: One of the marvelous things about this is the honesty -- that
once you're willing to face it, it becomes resolved. This is one of
the major uses of these substances, I think.
Jacob: I use an analogy
with them when we're going through preparation. You know, if you're walking along
and there's someone behind you and you're worried or scared about it and
you start to run, the more you run in fear from it the
greater the monster becomes. Once you stop and turn around it turns out
to be some little silly funny thing, and their fear disappears. There're many
little anecdotes like that that I would give in preparation for trips.
PHOTOGRAPHS
One of the things I have them do for the trip is to
get a bunch of pictures from a list that I give them. These
pictures actually as you'll see are a history of their lives. They go
back home or get them wherever they are or write for them. They
get all the pictures that they can and bring them to wherever they
are. Then I ask them to select the pictures in a particular manner
which is really very important. I say, "Give yourself plenty of time. First
let me give you the list of pictures that I want you to
get." Here's the list:
- Starting with the pictures of themselves, one at
age two and one every two years thereafter through adolescence, sixteen or eighteen.
- A picture of their mother and a picture of their father when
they were young but they can still remember their mother and their father,
and a recent picture of each.
- Same thing about each of their
siblings, an early one that they remember that way and a recent one
of their siblings and their families if they have one.
- A picture of a grandparent that was significant in their life.
- A picture
of any aunts, uncles, or cousins that were significant in their life.
- If they're married, I ask them to bring some wedding pictures because wedding
pictures usually have all the relatives and it gives them a chance to
see them. If they don't have any pictures I'll say a picture of
the woman you married either just before you married her or when you
got married, an early picture. And a recent one of her or him,
as the case may be.
-
If there are children, a picture of
the children when they were about two years old which is when they
begin to start to have a little personality of their own. And a
recent one of each. And if they are married, with their families. And
even if they're not married, a picture of any woman or man who
has had great significance in their life. Lovers, current or past or whatever.
- Other significant pictures.
I ask them to select the pictures in this
manner: Gather them all together -- boxes, albums, however they are, and put them in
front of you, and start with one. The top one or anything like
that. Pick it up and look at it. Just look at it to
see what you experience in connection with that picture. Look at it a
little while. You may not experience anything. It's all right. Put it aside,
pick up the next one, then look at it. If it provokes any
memories, kinda sit with the memories a little bit, let them go where
they want to go. Whatever feelings you have, allow them to be there.
Whenever you come across a picture that's on the list, set it aside
in a separate pile. Go through all the pictures you've got, every single
one of them, doing that. You may have to have two or three
sittings to do it. I ask them to do it no further away
than a week before the trip, as close to the time of the
trip as they can. I want to tell you something. That really turns
them on. When they come they're in the middle of their trip.
THE INDIVIDUAL TRIP
Myron : Let's get into your procedures.
Jacob: All right. I'll start with
the individual trip first, because the group trip follows the individual one. The
first trip is always with LSD. I like to start at eight o'clock
in the morning. I like to do it preferably in their own home,
if it's convenient, secure, and nobody's going to be there, nobody's going to
interrupt, and it isn't too far away for me to go to. (Laughs.)
I get there maybe a half hour before that, before eight.
I set up my equipment. My equipment consists of headphones, two face masks, a cassette
player and separate recorder, tapes for music, and a special cup. (Jacob shows
the box he takes along with him.) I carry these along with me
which is part of my ritual that I have. I talk about the
transformation experience and how the cup is always a very important symbol of
the transformation experience.
I have this setup with the earphones coming out of
this machine. This is the way I play my music to them. Music
is all on cassettes. The records scratch and they don't work very well
at all. Then I have another tape recorder in there which is used
to record everything that's said. I record the whole trip. I have a
remote control here that I use so that I only turn it on
when something's being said.
These are some of the things that I go
over with them. The structure is first. Structure is a very important thing,
and what structure is, is a set of agreements that I ask them
to make with me. These are the things that I ask them to
agree to with me:
- They will not leave the house where we're
having the trip at any time during the trip without prior clearance from
me.
- They agree that there will be no physical harm or violence
to themselves or to me or to anything else in the house.
- Reiteration of the security requirement. They agree they will not reveal to anybody
else where and with whom they had this trip without prior clearance from
me, ever.
- I ask them to agree -- now if this is a woman
or somebody gay -- I ask them to agree that there will be no sex
taking place between us. I'll explain the background for these agreements in a
minute.
- The last one I ask them to agree is that
at any time during the trip if anything is going on and I
tell them to stop it, stop doing it, and I make clear, "This
is under structure; it's not just a recommendation or suggestion," they agree that
they will stop it. Or if I tell them to do something and
I make clear it's under structure they agree that they will do it.
I tell them to look at this one very, very carefully, because when
they agree to that they are virtually putting their lives in my hands
and the only thing they have to go on is whatever faith they
have in me -- that I would never let them do anything that
would be harmful to themselves, nor would I ever require anything of them
that would be harmful to them. These are bills to faith. That puts
them back on their faith, see.
I review it, and then I say,
"Do you have any questions or qualifications or anything that you want to
know about it?" When they say no, I say, "Do you agree to
abide by this structure?" They say, "Yes." I say, "Thank you."
Now, the
first one, not to leave the house: I don't want them wandering around
without prior agreement. Sometimes when they're coming down from a trip if they
want to go out and walk around because its so beautiful, fine, I'll
walk with them. They ask and they check with me.
Physical harm and
violence: Sometimes people are afraid they're going to be angry, they're always talking
about the unexpressed anger that they've got. They're afraid that might happen so
when they make that agreement they feel safe about the anger, they're
not going to destroy anything or hurt anybody.
The fourth one about sex:
Sometimes women get real turned on. Sexually they get really connected with their
sexuality and they're scared, they don't know what to do with it so
they'll tend to squelch it. I don't want them to do that. I
want them to find it and hang on to it and know that
they're safe, nothing's going to happen. The same thing with a gay person.
If it comes up, let it come up, what the hell.
Okay. They've
agreed to abide by this structure. I ask them to read this, a
late 17th century prayer. It's the only thing I've ever found down through
the years that really is the most suitable for beginning a trip. I
ask them to read it quietly to themselves once and read it through
a second time:
Lord, I know not what I ought to ask of thee;
Thou only knowest what I need;
Thou lovest me better than I know how to love myself.
O Father, give to Thy child that which
he himself knows not how to ask.
I dare not ask either for crosses or for consolations;
I simply present myself before thee,
I open my heart to Thee.
Behold my needs which I know not myself;
see and do according to Thy tender mercy.
Smite, or heal; depress me or raise me up;
I adore all Thy purposes without knowing them;
I am silent; I offer myself in sacrifice;
I yield myself to Thee: I would have no
other desire than to accomplish Thy will.
Teach me to pray.
Pray Thyself in me.
AMEN.
-- Francois de Salignac Fenelon Archbishop of Cambray, 1651−1715,
Then we have a dropping ceremony, and I explain the cup and I
have water in it and I have the capsule with their medicine in
it, too. After they've read the prayer then I give it to them.
I've already explained the significance of the cup as a symbol of transformation
all the way back to Jesus and to earlier days and all that
kinda stuff. I have them take the cup and the capsule, swallow the
medicine whatever it happens to be, and drink the water from the cup.
After this dropping ceremony I ask to see their pictures. I have them
organize them according to this list, their own pictures first with the youngest
on top and the oldest one on the bottom. Their youngest age and
the oldest. Same with the mother and father and all the relatives if
there's any chronological period of time that's involved. The last one I ask
them to look at is their wife or lover currently.
Just before that
I organize them all in this fashion: First the pictures of themselves, then
the mother, then the father. Now, some of the other pictures will have
mother and father in them, too. They may have some very significant picture
show up that isn't on that list for mother, father, family, or something
like that. A house that they lived in or a pet that they
had, goodness knows what, maybe an army picture. Whatever really gives them an
emotional charge, positive or negative. That's what I call other significant pictures. They're
to pull those out to really get to cover the ground there. Sometimes
they bring too many, I screen them out.
Now, once they've dropped the
medicine, I say, "Let's look at your pictures." They'll show them to me,
and I arrange them in the order that I want to use them,
and that's it. We don't take them apart and look at them. I
set the organization and have them identified into their stacks, because we'll be
doing that later. Then we sit and we talk. I ask them if
they've had any dreams the night before or whatever. When they have them
I say, "Well tell me about it." I just want them to tell
me the dream. I frequently get something out of the dream.
I explain
to them, and I've already talked about this before to them but I
say, "You know when you go along through the transition from one stage
of consciousness to another one sometimes you run into difficulties. If you do,
like if you get frightened or something like that, all you have to
do is put out your hand. I'll see it, I'll be sitting right
there. If not just say, `Jacob.'" Their hand's out there, and I'll go
over and I'll take their hand and put it in mine. No talking,
or anything like that. I just hold it nice and firm and solid.
God, what they say afterwards about what happened during that holding the hand,
what a tremendous experience they had. If they want me to I'll put
my arms around them and hold them in my arms. I encourage them
when they get frightened to stay with it, don't try to do anything
about it, just let yourself be afraid. I explain to them I will
be here all the time. I always have a security bucket and a
package of kleenex, in case they get nauseated they've got the bucket there.
We'll sit and talk about different things until they feel
themselves starting to turn on. Then, fine, I ask them to go to
the bathroom and empty their bladder, then come back and lie down. Then
I put their eyeshades on, the earphones on, and cover them nice and
cozy and comfortable and turn on the music. I tell them that I'll
check in with them after an hour to see if they're turned on.
They turn on with the music. Beautiful turn-on music, too.
Myron: How do
you tell if they're turned on?
Jacob: What I do is I've got
a microphone, see, and I'll turn on the microphone and I'll talk. I'll
say, "______ (whatever their name is), do you feel turned on yet?"
They'll say, "Oh, yes."
I'll say, "Good. Have a good trip." And I just
turn off the thing and let it go.
Or they'll stop and they'll
think and say, "I'm not sure."
I say, "Are you as turned on as you'd like to be?"
Sometimes they say, "No, I think I could be more turned on."
I say, "Good, I'll give you a booster."
Or they'll say, "Gee, I'm really not sure. I haven't done this before. I
don't know what it is to be fully turned on."
I say, "Okay. I'll check back with you again in fifteen minutes." I don't think they
are, but I want to check back anyway, because sometimes they might turn
on, it takes an extra fifteen minutes. I check back with them in
fifteen minutes and I say, "Are you turned on now?" They'll still be
questioning. As long as they're able to question they aren't turned on enough,
I'll say, "Well, I'll give you a booster."
I check with them again thirty minutes later. Most of the times they are already turned on. If
not, I give them another booster. If they're not really turned on I'll
keep going until I check in and they say, "Oh, yeah." Sometimes I
watch them, I can tell from the way they are. I can tell
they're really stoned. They're going through quite a trip.
Myron: How long do
you wait for the second booster?
Jacob: Thirty minutes. Between boosters, thirty minutes
between any boosters until they're really turned on. A booster would go 125
micrograms unless not a thing's happening, they feel pleasant and all that but
not a thing's happening. Then I'll give them 250 micrograms. I mention to
them, "Look, sometimes you get real turned on by a piece of music
and it's a great experience and it ends and you're kind of disappointed.
All you have to do is say, `Play it again,' and I'll play
it again for you. You go right back out again." I tell them
that music is the vehicle that takes you to all the different places
you go on your trip. Music is the vehicle that takes you to
all the different places.
Myron: Isn't silence the vehicle sometimes?
Jacob: Oh yeah.
I say, "If you ever want to be quiet, have silence, let me
know." Most of the time they want the music. Oh yes.
Sometimes I'll
just not play anything for a while but in just a little bit
they'll say, "The music's off." You've never heard music in your life, really,
you'll see that you've never really heard music in your life until you've
heard it on the trip. Which is true, everybody knows who's had that.
I tell them, "Anytime I'm playing a piece of music that's not consonant
with where you are, that's bothering you or you don't like it, just
say, `Change the music,' and I will." Once in a while that happens.
Most of the time with the kind of music I have they dig
it all the way through.
I can tell when they're starting to come
down because until that time they are absolutely still. Every now and then
I've got to get down on the floor to look
to make sure they're still breathing! (Laughs.) I do that as a kind
of a ritual. I don't d o it because I'm scared any more.
(More laughter.) When they start to come down, they start to move around,
they may want to go to the bathroom. Sometimes in the middle of
the trip they want to go to the bathroom. That's fine, I take
them i n the bathroom and stay with them unless they want me
to g o outside. I ask them before they come out to stop
and look i n the mirror, the bathroom mirror. Just take a good
look. They do, you know, God they report things -- whatever they saw and all
that. Later. Not during this visit. I take them back, lie them down,
put them back.
All right. When they have come down enough that they're
able to talk but they're still hallucinating a little bit -- that may be five,
six hours into the trip, around that time -- some may be a little bit
earlier, some may be a little bit later, seven or eight hours -- and they're
functional, they can move around, I have them get up. I've told them
this is what'll happen. I have them get up and they go sit
down at a table some place and we do the picture trip.
What the picture trip is, I start out with pictures of themselves. I have
them in front of me. I take the first one and I hand
it to them and I tell them, "Just look at it, just look
at it and see what you experience. Look at it as long as
you want to. When you're through looking at it, hand it back. If
you have anything to say, fine. Say it. If not, you don't have
to say anything." One at a time I hand them the pictures. The
pictures, they don't react much to the two- to four-year-old pictures. Some time
around the age of six is a very significant picture for them. That's
the point in life where we lose our naturalness and we start taking
on the acts of the world and behaving the way people tell us
to and start squelching our own naturalness. Frequently they get to that picture
and they start to cry. And cry and cry and cry. "Gee, what
an unhappy face!" Or they say, "I don't know."
I'm taping everything that's
being said. They'll do a lot of talking and a lot of crying.
And a lot of ruminating, and remembering. This talking is very important to
them later on when they go back and listen to it. It reconnects
them with their whole experience. I give them the tape. After we've gone
through all the pictures we just sit around. If they want to listen
to music some more, fine. Listen to music. Then maybe about four o'clock
in the afternoon, say, I arrange to have the babysitter come by.
I don't like to leave them alone on the day of their trip. I
want to have somebody stay and spend the evening until they go to
sleep or spend the night. It's got to be somebody they know, love,
and trust as well as somebody who has tripped if it's at all
possible. Because somebody who has tripped knows how to serve somebody who's just
tripped without asking a whole bunch of stupid questions that they can't answer.
Just takes care of them, and just listens to them talk if they
have something to say. Or leaves them alone if they want to be
alone. I tell them, "I will not leave until you say it's okay
for me to leave." The person who comes as their sitter may be
their wife or husband. They may not have tripped but they may be
the most suitable person. I brief that person about how to take care
of things.
Myron: Generally in a marriage you have the partner absent during
the trip?
Jacob: Only me and the person on the trip. Unless I'm
doing a couples trip, but they've already tripped individually first. Although when the
other one comes in there's quite a bit of relating that goes on
because this person is so transformed and has come to a new level
of feeling of love about their spouse or lover or whoever it may
be. Then, oh, I might fix them a little plate of some fruit,
crackers or cheese or something to eat, you know some sensory thing, have
a glass of wine, something like that. I stay with them and the
sitter until it's okay for me to leave. I pack up my stuff
and I go on home. And that's it.
I'm available for them to
see or to call and I leave my number and everything. If anything
comes up they want to call me about, anything at all, I tell
them, "Don't hesitate at all, call me any time."
That's the individual trip.
THE GROUP TRIP
Jacob : One of the things that I've had a lot of experience
with is the group trip. People get a great deal out of the
group trip. It allows them to try a lot of different things, and
connect with a lot of other individuals. The way we've worked it out,
it lets them go through a progression of growth.
One of the most
important things for a group trip is to have a nice setting. I
have a very good friend in Washington, D.C., a psychiatrist who loves this
work. He has a place on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay,
not too long a drive from the city. It's perfect -- a nice view of
the water, lots of trees, secluded, excellent security. We've been running group trips
there for a long time. I used to fly out every month until
his own people got so experienced it wasn't necessary any more.
We generally
have between ten and twelve people come, trippers, and three gurus who stay
straight. They all arrive Friday evening around eight o'clock and they greet each
other with love and joy since they haven't seen each other since the
last trip they had together. They meet the new people and the new
people get to meet all of them. We only have one new person
a weekend unless there's too many backed up. Then we'll take two new
people a weekend. There'll be some snacks set out there for them to
nibble on and they'll have some wine. It's a nice occasion until they
all arrive. When they've all arrived and greeted each other, then we all
gather in the living room and sit around the room.
The leader makes
announcements about things and all of that. Then we induct the new people,
the new person or people, into the structure of the group. It's the
same set of agreements except no sex takes place during the weekend. This
is a very important thing. I want to tell you how important this
is. I'll tell you right now, otherwise I'll forget it.
The experience evokes
such a tremendous feeling of love and closeness that people love to be
close and hug each other and love each other. They have love puddles
where they all get together and just hug each other and love each
other. When they know there's not going to be any sex nobody's worried
about what might happen. They can let go to their really loving feelings
without being concerned about, "Is he trying to make out?" or, "Is she
wanting me to make out?" or whatever. All these crazy thoughts that occur
to people. Then they just have a marvelous time. That's after they've all
come down, you know. But the instruction is that no sexual activity take
place at any time during the weekend.
The last one is the same
as the last one I gave about the individual trip -- do what I tell
you to do or stop doing what you're doing -- it's the same structure. But
now it's with the group. They're being inducted and everybody else is renewing
the structure for themselves. The leader presents them with the questions and asks
them if they agree and they say yes. He says, "Thank you," and
they say, "Thank you," and then they go on.
The next thing is
that the leader may read something or talk about something that he's currently
working on or something like that. Not really much more. He asks, "When
you talk tonight, I want you to just talk out of your experience
and tell whatever's going on in your life that you want to share
with us, whatever you're hoping will happen this weekend." There's a variety of
things that he mentions.
By the way, the new person has already been
briefed about the whole procedure for the whole weekend so they know what
to expect. Then the leader says, "Who would like to start?" Somebody raises
their hand and starts talking about where they're at, what's going on, what's
happened since the last time. Anything that occurs to them. We ask them
to talk to the whole group, not just talk to the leaders. We
don't go around the circle, because no one should feel under pressure. Whatever
they want to say, and as much as they want to say is
fine.
It's only when you're ready to speak that you do it. There
are frequent breaks. After about four persons there's a break. They
all get up and pee, drink some water, have some more nibbles or
something and talk and catch up on things until we've gone all the
way through everybody. That includes the three staff. We all participate; we say
what's going on in our lives, what we're into. And, as I've explained
it to them, each comes there as a separate link, and in this
process they forge the link into a chain, by this process of sharing
with each other. You learn a lot, too. You sure do. And we
see how far so-and-so has gone since the last time or whatever.
It takes a number of trips before you get to trip with everybody
who comes, and you don't get to trip with everybody who comes because
some people come once every six months or once a year so they're
tripping with different people all of the time. There's always somebody there that
they know from other trips, two or three maybe. So you really get
the experience of a whole bunch of people.
Then the leader talks about going to bed -- what happens is when they're ready to go to sleep, they
stake out their pads where they're going to sleep. Pads with blankets. They
pick places all around the house. When they're ready to go to sleep,
they smoke some grass sometimes to help them to go to sleep. Whatever.
It's all okay. When they want to go to sleep they go over
to their pad, lie down, put the earphones on and there's music playing,
going-to-sleep music, until they go to sleep. They wake up early in the
morning, around 6:30, and complete their toilet. We ask them to be very
quiet, not silent but quiet and reflective. If they meditate, do some meditating.
Move around outside, just not a lot of unnecessary yacking. They follow that
pretty well.
One at a time each person sits down at a table
with me and the leader and we go over what medicine they're going
to take. (The various agents available and their effects are described in Chapter
5.) We decide what they're going to take and how much. It depends
upon what they're trying to achieve, what they're looking for, what they hope
will happen and what kind of medicine they think they want, if they've
had different ones. Frequently they know just what they want to take, and
we've already got the standard dosage for that person. Fine. We put it
in an envelope, until we've gotten everybody.
We all gather in the living
room again and we have our dropping ceremony, which is a very nice
ceremony. After everybody's dropped, they wander around, they're quiet. We ask them to
still be quiet, until they feel themselves starting to turn on. Before that
they've staked out tripping spaces, which may or may not be different from
the sleeping spaces. If there's two people coming together as a couple we
want them to trip in different parts of the house, whereas they might
have slept together.
When they start to turn on, they go to their pads, lie down,
put the eyeshades on and the earphones on and there's music playing already.
They just lay there until they turn on. The only time we ever
hear from them is when somebody feels they haven't turned on and want
a booster. They'll call one of us over. Or if they have to
get up and pee later on. We've got it down now so we
know everybody's dosage, so we rarely have to give a booster. They lay
on their pads, and we're in the kitchen sitting and talking and all
that stuff and waiting, just being available.
Myron: All the time they're really
in it, they're laying there listening to music?
Jacob: Right.
Myron: You don't
encourage any interrelationship.
Jacob: No! We don't want anybody to talk. Sometimes, somebody
when they have MDMA, Jesus Christ, you know, they want to hold hands,
it's so loving and all that. That's all right. If somebody doesn't want
to hold hands, they're on a different material, all they have to do
is hold their hand back and everybody respects their position. The MDMA people
like to get up and do some hugging and then we set them
right back down. We'll all hug them, they'll call us over just for
a big hug. They're so full of love, it's really fantastically beautiful.
By middle afternoon they start coming down and they start moving around. They'll go
outside in the patio or just sit around in the house and they're
still turned on or coming down, whatever. Later on there are some things
put out on the table -- salad, some crackers and some fruit and some things
for nibbles. Then when they're all down, when they're all down enough so
that they're quite functional, we all gather in the living room and we
have our champagne ceremony. All of this is tradition that's built up over
the years. It's hard for me to trace all the different activities that
we went through to get to this point. But this seems to be
the most fruitful. The old timers who come back to trip with us
once in a while who went through that early stuff say this is
a helluva lot better way to trip.
After the champagne ceremony we have
dinner. After dinner, we'll all sit around and laugh and giggle and tell
jokes and have fun, or sit quietly and just observe the others that
are still tripping. Or if they want to be alone they go off
somewhere to keep going on their trip. The music continues so they can
listen to it if they want to, until they're ready to go to
bed. When they're ready to go to bed they find an empty pad
and lay down. There's no staking out because they're pretty stoned. They get
up in the morning oh, by 7:30 anyway. We have breakfast at nine.
We ask them to be quiet again in the morning, too, because their
trip is still going on even though they're not stoned.
After breakfast they
all gather in the living room again. And the leader usually has a
reading. I always had a reading, it's a nice thing, very appropriate, no
matter what the hell you do, it's appropriate. From where they're at, everything's
appropriate. They go around again and they talk about what happened.
One of the last things that's said on Friday night -- it's traditional, too -- "I want you all
to now take a look at yourselves, close your eyes and look at
yourself and just see what you're experiencing now, that's all. Just see what
you're experiencing now." They give them about a minute to do that and
then the leader says, "We'll ask you to do this again on Sunday
morning." And he does. This sharing is the high point of the trip
for everybody. No t only have they had their trip, they're going to
have ten other people's or eleven other people's trips, too. And the feeling
and the sharing and the talking out of where they are, sometimes the
deep crying that comes out. Everybody is just pulled into it. And we
are one. Until then we do not know what happened on anybody's trip.
We don't know! That's our payoff for having been there all that time
and handling it like we do.
When they're all through we have lunch and we get ready to leave.
By mid-afternoon they go home. They sign up for the next one they
want to come to. They are available every month.
Myron: So if you
only have it once a month and you can only handle ten to
twelve, probably you have a much larger group moving in and out of
the group experience.
Jacob: Oh, yes! Oh, yes!
Myron: What would you say
is sort of a working number?
Jacob: The active members of the group
are about 40 or 50 who are coming every third or fourth month.
There are about 100 who come less frequently. Something like that. You see,
we have a priority list. The priority list is this. First trippers have
first priority, the first time they're coming to the group. The second priority
is somebody who hasn't tripped for a long time. Third priority is somebody
who is in some kind of space where they really need a trip,
want very much to have a trip, and we agree that it would
be a good thing for them to have it, if there isn't a
possibility for them to have it another way. But they don't generally want
to the other way, they'd rather trip with the group anyway. And then
there's another priority: we try to keep a balance between men and women.
Well, that fills the group, you see, if we get through all of
those priorities.
MATERIALS AND DOSES
Myron : I'm interested in the different chemicals that you've run across. What
kind of significant differences, if any, do you see among the different agents?
Jacob: We have a spectrum of materials that we use. They've been screened
out. I've tried many of them, explored many of the new ones that
have come out. I'll list the ones that are most suitable for a
group trip as far as we're concerned. There are many more but most
of them will do the same thing as these do and most of
them won't do as well as these do. One of them is LSD.
Everyone first has an individual trip with me which establishes their LSD dose
level. Other materials we use are the Psilocybe cubensis mushroom, dried. And mescaline -- we
don't use peyote. MDA. Ibogaine. Harmaline -- we call it yagé. It's the active
ingredient of yagé, that's the harmaline hydrochloride.(1)
MDMA, Adam(2). I have not adopted
2C-B. It just doesn't seem suitable for a group trip at all. Or
DOB or the TMA series. TMA-2(3) is the one that was thought best
for an experience.
Myron: I'm surprised that DOB hasn't worked well.