Betty Grover Eisner, Ph.D.
1447 17th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90404
August 7, 2002
Introduction and acknowledgements
This book consists of my recollections, correspondence to and from me about work with psychedelics, and reports about drug sessions. Its purpose is to not only document work that I and others did, but to also make a case for the therapeutic potential, given the proper circumstances, of the drugs discussed. For further information about my work, I have donated my files to Stanford. Although the book contains biographical material, it is not complete.
Names of researchers or people known to have used the drugs are included as are the names of my husband, Will, his sister, Helen, his brother and sister-in-law, Bob and Vi, my brother, Jack, and our children, Maleah and DB. Other names have been replaced by one or two letters.
I would like to thank all the people who made my work possible. I also thank my children, Dr. David Eisner and Dr. Maleah Grover-McKay, for their help with this book.
Betty Grover Eisner, Ph.D.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Initiation into Infinity
Chapter 2: The Parameters of Infinity
Chapter 3: Our Research
Chapter 4: More Investigation of Parameters
Chapter 5: Exploring the Mind Through Space: The Trip to Europe
Chapter 6: A New Environment, New Direction
Chapter 7: The Researchers Get Together: International Conferences
Chapter 8: The Light of LSD Starts to Go Out
Chapter 9: One Session After Another
Chapter 10: More Sessions
"I could feel my tongue getting thick, and I couldn't answer
questions quite properly. It felt as though the messages were all
coming into the switchboard, and messages were going out all
right, but that the switchboard was congested and the two weren't
coordinating. As though the operator had something else on her
mind or too much to do, and was just letting things get all jammed
up" (from LSD session report, October 1955).
The point of the Cohen-Fishman study was to compare the
functioning of an individual under the drug and in his individual
state. For this a battery of psychological tests were devised to
measure the functioning of the individual as himself and after
having taken the drug. In order to accomplish this, there were a
number of tests chosen for measuring different aspects of the
person: general intelligence, psychological functioning,
psychological makeup, maturity, and general functioning ability as
shown by the difference between the drug and non-drug states. Drug
dosage was assigned according to body weight of the subject.
Comparisons were made between the drug and non-drug states to get
insights on the drug being tested.
In this battery, the individual tests had been given in some
of the psychological tests like the "Draw a Person" (DAP), where
the individual draws a picture about how he feels about himself
and other people. The description of the drug experience
continues.
"Then I saw the color of the wall waxing and waning - ebbing
and flowing. The extraordinary character of light and color...There
was a third-dimensionality to color - and a constant change. And
there would be a symphony of variations on what ordinarily is a
plain brown wall...This was interesting - how dimension and color
all were mixed up in that they were all part of the whole
pulsating ebb and flow, and it took enormous effort to try and
separate things out sufficiently to describe accurately what was
happening."
"Just before the colors hit and the curtain started down
between sections of my brain, I had that wonderful relaxation
which I had known before - the awe-inspiring relief, the letting
go of psychological barriers which has come to be identified in my
thinking with the relaxation of the ego. I could feel myself
being drawn into a mystical experience - the sense of unity with
all things in the universe... But as I felt the relaxing of the
self boundaries, there was this flood of grateful tears which I
stopped because of the three men present..."
Searching through the accordion-pleated files of time for the
context of that experience takes me back to 1955, to the beginning
of LSD research in the western United States and to my own first
knowledge of the drug. There was that notice on the UCLA
Psychology Department requesting a graduate student for a doctoral
thesis on the effects of a new and unusual drug. In the recesses
of another fold of memory from who knows where or when, came:
"I'll bet that research is about LSD!" (There had been an article
in LOOK magazine.)
I yearned to apply to Sidney Cohen, M.D., the author of that
request, but I couldn't; I had almost completed the work for my
own infertility studies, and the time loss was much too great for
my own dissertation on infertility. Next best was to send a
friend, and one was handy, Lionel Fishman. He hadn't seen the
notice, but was very interested. However, before telling him the
details, I extracted his promise that I be the first subject if
indeed the research were on LSD. Lionel, or Fish, as we called
him, talked to Dr. Cohen, signed on with enthusiasm, and didn't
forget his promise. After Dr. Cohen and Fish had their own trial
experiences with LSD, I indeed became their first research
subject. The original quotation at the beginning of this was part
of the report on the LSD session.
I remember my intense interest in their study, but I didn't
have much time to kibitz, as I was dragging myself out of bed at
4:30 a.m., trying to finish my dissertation. I had passed the
write doctoral exams at UCLA the spring of 1955, the same year
that my son arrived to join his three-year old sister. (I figured
that gave me an M.A. at least twice over - at school and at home.)
I was pretty far along on my dissertation, too, as I remember, at
the point of getting judges to categorize the Rorschach responses
of the women who couldn't get pregnant as contrasted to women who
had at least two children and no difficulty getting pregnant. At
the same time, I was doing that pre-sunrise scene in order to
write on the dissertation. I was in no position to add any other
activities.
But I did add just one - serving as subject for the Cohen-
Fishman study. Lately, just recently, all I could remember of
that first LSD experience was that I was constantly being
interrupted in my LSD experience in order to take tests. In the
Draw-a-Person I remembered the courtly French cavalier type I drew
for the man. (In contrast, my report - thank heaven for the
necessity to write a report:
"I wanted to draw Little Lord Fauntleroy...I didn't want to put
it down. But my honesty made me do it, although my defensiveness
changed it into a courtier at the time of one of the Louis'. That
way it was more acceptable.")
With the Draw-a-Person, one first draws the way one sees
oneself. I had just remembered the courtier more strongly. Also,
as I first remembered, the woman I drew was in a hoop skirt, I
remembered this from the same period. (Ah, memory! The actuality
of the first figure I drew, a woman, was quite different, thank
heavens for records!)
"I drew an old-fashioned little girl - and at the same time I
really didn't want to - knowing I was drawing myself. And I came
up with a little girl where the head didn't belong to the body.
The legs were all grown up but the head was a vapid child's head.
And the dress was of the Victorian era."
It was a terrible experience to reveal oneself so clearly,
and it was also humiliating to be asked to perform tasks when I
couldn't concentrate; I couldn't think; and the tasks seemed
meaningless and irrelevant. For instance:
"It was the word association test, and I was completely set
to cooperate and to give associations. But with the first word I
realized that it was impossible. There was no association present
at all. It was as though the word had been released into a great
bubble of space-time and hung suspended there. It had no
relationship to anything. And since it was completely irrelevant,
I couldn't even attempt to find a word to go along with it. It
would be like trying to answer a question on color with a bar of
music."
"I tried to tell them what it was like - it was as though I
was in the middle of a wide wonderful pasture - free and green and
full of sunlight, and something was going on back at the fence
that they wanted me to do. I was in the pasture, but the word
association test was part and parcel of the fence - which is only
an artificial barrier with no real intrinsic meaning to the
freedom of the pasture. It was trivial, and there was no
association of any kind, so I begged off. It was almost
impossible to see how intelligent people could expect to find
meaning to life (which was the pasture) in contemplating designs
of the fence. And suddenly I saw the difficulty. Life is the
warmth and the flowing and the three-dimensionality - but it comes
overwhelming to a man who must compress it into one dimension and
flatness and barrenness in order to deal with it. And this
necessity to deal with it comes when he tries to go somewhere. It
is the motion of trying to go - trying to get some place is the
difficulty - it is the cause of the descent from Eden. Because
the minute that one tries to go someplace or to "be" someone or
something, then one is not content to let things be. In our ardor
to "be" something, we lose personal life - and must content
ourselves with this poor, flat, tawdry imitation... the illusion had
become a reality."
Pretty heavy material!
In the session of January 10, 1957, I remembered telling Sid
Cohen that I felt that LSD was a therapeutic drug, and that there
were profound therapeutic implications to be examined with respect
to its use. After my first LSD on October 10, 1955, I had worked
very hard and finished my doctorate - not in March of 1956 because
both kids got the mumps - but by the end of July. I had been
meeting with Sid periodically about the LSD work because of the
fascination I felt after my first session despite the frustration
of being pulled back to reality to perform the tasks. Sid gave me
numerous reports of people who had taken LSD and what they had to
say about their experiences. There may have been some mescaline
reports among the LSD reports too.
As I remember, the majority of reports came from Al Hubbard's
file. Al was the grand old man of LSD, of consciousness change.
How he heard about the LSD, I'm not sure, but he had worked with
mescaline and other substances, and he was the first explorer of
the LSD universe on the West Coast. He was reputed to be a
millionaire, and after he first tried LSD, he reportedly ordered
43 cases from Sandoz, and got them! And, "Captain" or "Dr."
Hubbard was the one who first gave LSD to Humphry Osmond, and
perhaps Aldous Huxley and Gerald Heard. Al had worked with the
mescaline before with Humphry Osmond. In fact, Al met Humphry
because of Humphry's report on his working with mescaline.
Al also explored every mind-changing drug he heard about. My
first memory of him is his arrival at our house carrying a tank of
nitrous oxide and conning everyone present to having a whiff by
extolling its virtues for psyche and soul.
Just wasn't only nitrous oxide that Al had - he had developed
his own pharmacopoeia to "blow out the stuff" that stood in the
way of a good LSD session, which to him meant having a mystical
experience. He was for the preliminary "clearing away the
problems," and then giving one large dose to produce a
transcendental experience. For instance, he had little white
pills, called, I thought, mescaline-amphetamine, which caused
people to open up and talk. In retrospect, I think it was
methedrine with Al's fancy name. But even more important, as I
remember it was on a later visit, he had tanks of oxygen and
carbon dioxide. This was the first time he had experienced or
seen the Meduna technique of inhaling "carbogen" for altered
states of consciousness in order to help deal with psychological
problems. I was to find that 6 to 10 inhalations, or "sniffs"
helped as preparation for my second LSD session and then was
useful in working to dissolve problems which arose afterwards.
Much later Ernie Katz and I were taught by Lee Sanella to use
carbogen (70% oxygen, 30% carbon dioxide) along with Ritalin - a
technique which really "blew out the problems." This was a
remarkable technique which patients hated more than any other but
also knew how effective it was in helping solve psychological
problems. I applaud it for the remarkable work it accomplished.
What a buccaneer Hubbard was - large, rambling, and with his
own private plane and special island on Puget Sound (which some
gossip said belonged to a mysterious sponsor; this was in no way
ever confirmed). We all felt as though he traveled with pockets
full of magic and gold. From reports that I wrote at the time I
can see how much I owe Al and his soft-spoken, insightful wife,
Rita, for all they taught us about using drugs and also all the
help they game me when I was going through the aftermath of that
traumatic second LSD session. The following gives a flavor of Al:
September 23, 1957
Dear Dr. Betty (which he always called me),
"It gave us great pleasure to read your last letter, and to
realize that my last one to you somehow jumped the semantic
barriers and put across even in a small way which I desired to
express..."
"I think I know that you believe I have some sort of block
towards academic people, but really Betty, I do not. I think it
is just that I expect so much more from them than they are able to
give, and it is such a shock sometimes to realize how little it
all really counts that I do perhaps rather take the attitude, `Oh
Hell, another dough-head.' Perhaps part of it is the years I have
had in this work, and being only human after all, many times have
had the experience of knowing that I have done a really good job,
and it would not have cost some Doctor anything at all to have
said it was good. After all, that is all outside of the knowledge
that we are doing good work, and that is all I get out of it. I
suppose as I advance in my own development this will all pass
away, I sincerely hope so..."
May 7, 1957
"...I have no trouble in Canada as I work under authority of
the Government of Canada..."
"As to your reference to Catholic doctor, I think this is an
excellent idea...I am perfectly aware that most of our people with
their little personal God do now know my God of the Galaxies, and
there is such a vast chasm between their God and my God that in
most cases it would be impossible to bridge. The small group of
mystics in our church who know what I am talking about and within
whose authority I operate, are not very many compared with the
five hundred million members..."
Al formed The Commission for the Study of Creative
Imagination with himself (and his questionable Ph.D.) as research
director, with Humphry Osmond, Abram Hoffer, John Smythies, Sidney
Cohen, Aldous Huxley, Gerald Heard, Henry Puharich, Hugh
Keenleyside and W. Kluhauf of Mexico City on the Board.
October 28, 1957
Dear Dr. Betty,
"...I believe there are certain common experiences for all
people in these things, and I believe as I believed before, one
must have spiritual grace to allow them to enter into certain
dimensions or levels or what you will to call them. Then they
have to have the intellectual capacity to turn it into current
language of our day, describing the symbolic experience that they
went through. Some minds are just not capable of doing this and
look upon the enormity of the things brought before them with its
fringe of illusion mixed up with some hallucinations, and just
say, `Yes, I have lived many times before.' Then proceed to
confabulate until they complete the `acceptable experience of the
objective mind.' This does not mean that the experience has not
been valuable to them, but the capacity to appreciate it in full
is missing..."
Al Hubbard was a real and daring pioneer in drug work. He
was first with so many things, and he never received the credit he
deserved. But there were a lot of pioneers - Humphry Osmond, with
his quiet and charming English gentlemanly way, his penetrating
ideas, and his courageous spirit. He and Al Hubbard used to play
intricate games in the cosmos after having taken LSD or mescaline.
Next there was Aldous Huxley; no need to describe him - everyone
knows of his scintillating mind, and what a path-forging person he
was. He was also very kind to all of us who worked in the area.
In fact, I never knew Aldous to be anything but kind to everyone.
I'll never forget an argument he had with Tim Leary - a discussion
as far as Aldous was concerned - about the role of the cellular
intelligence, to which Tim was assigning total credit with much
heat and emphasis. "But, Timothy," Aldous said patiently and
gently, "the cellular intelligence is important. But there are
other forms or intelligence, too."
Gerald Heard, the English philosopher who was very interested
in the LSD work at this time, was just as brilliant as Aldous, but
he talked in paragraphs that ran for a page or two, and always had
an esoteric association to the insight at hand. I had met Gerald
Heard at Trabuco, a meditation retreat he and Felix Greene founded
and built in southern California in the 1940's. I will never
forget the Benedictine silence at Trabuco, and the meditation
room, built in the three descending circular levels and fitted
with black curtains so that it was a place where no light could
ever penetrate - of the worldly type, that is. Gerald was very
shy and reclusive in those days, but the consciousness-changing
work made him much more outgoing and more inclined to work with
others.
I realize that all this time I haven't described Sid Cohen,
who at the time I met him was head of Psychosomatic Medicine at
the Brentwood Veterans' Administration. He was the main rock-hard
researcher who did not tolerate fools lightly. Sid had the look
of an eagle about him, and much of the sharp-eyed, hard-nosed
skepticism that might be said to accompany it. He was also
enormously subject to data and facts, which made him a true
scientist and opened his mind to experiences beyond those with
which he might be familiar. He was also a penetratingly
intelligent researcher and research supervisor; he should have had
legions of devoted researchers to follow their combined hunches -
something which he was able to do only for a certain period of
time.
But something happened in later years, and Sid, who had done
the definitive work on toxic psychosis, all sorts of research on
psychedelics, and also wrote articles and a book on LSD, seemed to
have his perception change as time passed, into a bias against
psychedelics. This might well have developed because of the wide-
appearance of the drug culture in the later years of his life. But
then he was as excited as all the rest of us about LSD, levels of
consciousness, our psychotherapeutic work, and the work and
thinking of anyone who was using psychedelics creatively - and
properly.
During this period, the fall of 1956 and early 1957, there
was a boiling activity. We read report after report - dozens - of
people who had taken LSD and/or mescaline. And we discussed them,
Sid and I - and Al, and Humphry Osmond when he visited, and people
like Tom Powers who came from the east coast to experience LSD,
bringing W. Wilson from AA on several trips. Every one of the
people wanted to talk about their experiences, experiences which
were so unique that each one of us was busy trying to make sense
of all the phenomena which were occurring, and to fit them into
some intelligible description, category, and understanding.
Through the fascination of all of the personal reports of LSD
sessions ran the thread of the therapeutic possibilities of the
drug, which confirmed my own intuition from my first experience -
fragmented though it was from all the tests I had taken. The more
I read, the stronger I felt. I shared my feelings with Sid, and
he agreed.
Little did I know though, what I was getting into when I
agreed to serve as the first subject (as far as we knew) to test
the possible therapeutic potential of LSD. If I had known what
was going to happen I doubt that I ever would have taken that
fateful 100 gamma, the same dosage I had had at my first LSD
session. (The report says my first time I was given 70 + 30 gamma,
split.)
This time there was a difference, however. I was at least a
little more prepared. I had the good sense to arrange for sitters
for the children; I planned nothing for after the session, having
learned from the experience following my first LSD. I ended up in
chaos and total confusion and found myself putting the undried
clothes carefully back into the washer after I had put them from
the washer into the dryer.
After that first LSD session, I had to call my husband home
from work because I was such a complete mess; I had no conception
of what a disorienting experience LSD could be. No one had told
me that - or that it could go on for hours or actually even days!
Lucky that I made those arrangements! After the second LSD I
ended up, not in chaos and confusion but with the blackest
depression that anyone could dream up. Depression had never been
a symptom I suffered from.
Many hours afterwards, in despair, I finally forced myself to
especially call Sid for help. Sid sat through much of my session.
It was shattering to find that our phone was out of order when I
went to call. In profound physical and psychological distress, I
walked to the corner to a pay phone, forced myself to wait in
line, and called, finally reaching Sid.
He refused to take me seriously saying to get a good night's
sleep and all would be well in the morning. I clearly remember
telling him that it wouldn't look good for the research if the
psychologist who was the subject committed suicide. He was
unimpressed.
Then I called my closest friend who had been with me through
the whole eight hours of my LSD experience. She had taken a
sleeping pill and was exhaustedly on her way to bed. The pill had
begun to work, and not only was it impossible for her to come and
help me, but she couldn't even talk long and coherently enough to
help make sense of where I was. I can't remember what I did then
in my despair, but I must have walked home. I know that I felt
the universe had collapsed on me.
But our hypothesis had been proven! My friend told me as she
delivered me home after the session that I had gone through the
equivalent of 500 hours of analysis, something she knew only too
well since she had been in analysis for many years with Dr. Otto
Fenichel, a disciple of Freud's. Fine thing! The experiment was
a success, but the patient was about to die!
In any case, in the midst of the profound depression, I may
have saved my life and I certainly saved my sanity, by searching
through our library, book by book until I came upon what finally
helped. All night long I submerged myself in the writings of St.
John of the Cross - that long, long night of the dark of my soul!
Thirty five years later, these are the memories which come
into being about that session: the beginning with Mozart where
there were all sorts of gleaming insects attacking my head,
beautifully-colored insects which drilled into my skull; the ice
princess and the gingerbread (man) - northern part and southern,
warmer parts. But, as before, I had mostly forgotten. From the
report, written within the first 24 hours of the session, dated
January 10, 1957:
"Actually, I sort of expected a repetition of the freedom
from self of the first session. But in reality I lived through a
massive reduction of my defenses and habit patterns back to the
very beginning of family identifications. All of these appeared
in brilliant color, so, although I was conscious of what was going
on, I might be said to have been hallucinating. I could stop the
process when I wanted to, but I tried to ride the emotional and
symbolic wave down to the bottom to understand the whole story."
"Almost the whole process was acute agony - pure hell or
purgation - and I realized it as such and spoke of it thus. It
was purgation of the spirit through self-knowledge; not just
insightful knowledge, but also emotional knowledge of a direct and
actual and acute sort. Almost the whole time I realize that I was
enclosed in a wall of the defense: I could see and feel the
limitation. But several times the light broke through, and at the
end when I was beaten and spent I began the ascent to the light of
wholeness and integration..."
"I remember having the feeling of waiting, waiting - waiting
for I knew not what. Then I saw spots of brilliant color in small
flecks or squares - the pure color made when a prism diverts pure
light. The flecks danced all over to the music and everything in
between was gray. To the left was a sly fox with a bushy tail. I
realized with anguish - because it became painful at the very
beginning - that analysis is my first line of defense: I take
reality and break it up into pieces because I cannot deal with it
whole and pure. This makes flecks of extraordinary brilliant
color, but the whole interplane is gray. And how foxy I think the
defense of analysis is!"
"Then I saw a white church and spire against a mauve
background, and this reminded me of a cardboard cover for a record
- again, a defense against the pure music itself. I fought
throughout the session to understand and associate to these
symbols. The little white church with the high steeple at times
had a woman standing beside it. She was all bundled up in warm
clothes - mauve with a white trim - and it was cold. The woman
became in turn a madonna, a snow maiden, a snowman, and a
gingerbread man...Sometimes the church would show just its bare
bones - the ribbing like the prow of a ship, and then the woman
became a figurehead. And at times the bare bones of the church
changed into a magnificent cathedral with the shadow of the
structure still upon it. And I realized that these were the
planes of the prism which contaminated the pure soaringness of the
church - the bones of my defensive system."
"As I experienced these symbols I relived the myth of Nordic
supremacy - to my horror. I was made to feel the coldness, the
austereness, the separateness of the myth that Nordic people are
superior to others. I realized that this had been built into me
from earliest childhood. I felt its austerity and its coldness -
anyone who must be superior pays the price of snow and ice. And
through these symbols I released the racial intolerance back and
down to my childhood where I was brought up in the South - and I
loosened part of my own need for feeling superior. The first line
of defense: analysis. The second line of defense: prejudice and
intolerance..."
"In understanding the symbols I found the madonna and the
gingerbread man were two halves of myself which I could not get
together into a whole - they were stereotypes of my misperceptions
of the masculine and feminine parts of my nature."
"We followed this down - down through my relationships with
sensitive men whom I had manipulated so that at times I felt I had
driven them to the brink of death or insanity. I felt this in a
violent way because the guilt and the misery of manipulation of
the vulnerable was so overwhelming for me to face. I felt that I
should be my brother's keeper, but instead I had used my brother
to my own advantage. I saw this with terrible and excruciating
clarity in terms of how I had sided against my brother and father;
I who knew how he felt and should have protected him! And how
this relationship of fundamental competitiveness had become
displaced with the years onto my relationship with men."
"As the guilt piled up, I felt that I killed my father,
turned my mother toward insanity and made my brother neurotic and
latently homosexual. And it was too much. I went off into a
tangential world and knew that I was insane. I could feel the
enclosedness of it, the separateness, and worst of all - the
symbolization. I saw giant mosquitoes which drilled into my skull
and sucked out the brains. They were not alive but were
mechanical - huge, impersonal, glittering insects with the flecks
of brilliant color that were the sign of my analytic tendencies as
decorations on their transparent, beautiful but completely dead
wings. And they swarmed around in complete silence. I told the
therapists that they would have to pull me through - or I didn't
know what would happen."
Well, pull me through they did, by showing me that as a
little girl I couldn't have been responsible for all those
problems, but enough was left of the massive dose of self-
awareness that it precipitated me into that profound depression.
I swore that I would never do that to a patient!
And we never did.
Letter to Ewing W. (Zip) Reilley of New York who funded our
research at the V.A. Saturday, January 12, 1957
Dear Zip:
"And the top of the New Year to you -- and all good wishes
for each and every day of 1957."
"I am writing you for several reasons: first to tell you how
much Will and I enjoyed meeting you and Tom last week. Secondly -
- aren't you the sly one! Here I talked practically all evening
about my absorbing interest in the therapeutic application of LSD
and even mentioned that Sid needed money for a study, and you
didn't say a word about your good deed and the fact that you will
make all this possible..."
"I thought you might like to know that we have in effect
started: Thursday I took LSD with a therapeutic orientation with
a friend of mine (with whom I've worked out a number of problems
in the past) and Sid present. The equivalent of four years of
analysis in six hours. And it's still coming..."
"There were so many things I learned for subsequent therapy.
First, the preparation before taking the drug is of utmost
importance. It sets the whole frame of reference. Nothing can
happen at all, to speak of, if the person is unwilling to go into
problems -- or is closed to the possibility of religious
experience. Both aspects seem to be necessary. It is quite
possible that with patients preliminary sessions of small amounts
of LSD to get the problem areas out into the open and cleared up
will prove to be the optimal way of proceeding."
"Then I learned something about the well defended, successful
people: they are more difficult to open because their defensive
system has been so beautifully rewarded and sanctioned by society.
And their anxieties are deeply buried along with their
unacceptable drives. I also have a hunch that individuals in the
psychiatric field or allied ones are also more defended along
these lines. I want to test some of these hypotheses -- another
of which is that alcoholics, with proper preparation -- are almost
the best possible subjects -- A.A.'s that is. They've been living
through their hell on earth and if really close to accepting the
third step are really open to what LSD can do for them... if you
have any questions I'd love to try to answer them..."
"For now -- blessings on you for all your good works -- and
for making this possible for us. Will joins me in all good
wishes. Betty"
Letter from Zip Reilley postmarked January 27, 1957
Dear Betty and Will:
"I am sorry to have delayed so long in answering your
wonderful letter. It `rang such a bell' with me that I wanted to
be in a position to do justice to it..."
"The reason your letter made such an impression is that it
served to crystallize the realization that I am an example of `the
well defended, successful people'...who are `more difficult to open
because their defensive system has been so beautifully rewarded
and sanctioned by society etc'. I have been working on this
problem in a groping and not very effective sort of way for years.
So LSD holds out for me the hope of accelerating this process..."
"I am delighted by your reaction to the opportunity to work
with Sid in the exploration of the therapeutic potentialities of
LSD. And it was a great privilege to have been able to play a
small part in furthering the work. I hope that I will have an
opportunity to do more. (And who knows, I may have been `casting
my bread on the waters' personally as well!) If LSD can do
generally what it did for you of accomplishing in six hours the
equivalent of four years' psychotherapy, I cannot imagine a
greater boom to mankind. Certainly this is something we can all
get very enthusiastic about and contribute to in whatever way we
can..."
"All my best to both of you...Zip"
Wednesday, February 13, 1957
Dear Zip:
"I can't tell you what a pleasure it was to have your good
letter..."
"First -- we all send greetings. Sid said to tell you that
your gift has been accepted (many thanks again) and my contract is
in Washington for approval just now. It is to run from March l to
July l with privileges of renewal. My office is just about ready,
and we hope to start soon on our first official subject. Because
in the meantime we have been experimenting unofficially. The
picture becomes much clearer, and the necessity of the problem-
centered LSD experience emerges even more strongly...I feel, and I
think that Sid does too -- that the best possible therapeutic LSD
experience is one in which a subject glimpses the unity of the
cosmos and his own place in it, and then sees and tackles his
problems in relationship. And it can be done and that is what we
are going to be doing..."
"I have high hopes (and some concrete evidence) that small
doses of LSD are most efficacious in beginning the lowering
process of the defenses; the next step is to test this out
precisely..."
"I shall leave room for a note for Will... And now with best
love from us both -- until soon - Betty"
Letter from Tom Powers, dated January 22, 1957
Dear Betty,
"Thank you for your letter of the 12th and for letting me
share what you wrote Zip. I would like to know much more about
what happened when you took LSD..."
"Even after the quite literal miracles with which my life has
been blessed, I am still a person of so little faith that when the
hand of God becomes obvious in certain events, I experience a kind
of delightful uneasiness. It was so in our meeting with you and
Will. After all that had happened on our trip, it seemed almost
too good..."
"The evening after I returned from California I had a
wonderful talk with my Mother and Dad. I told them about the new
LSD experience, and we talked particularly about the beauty of the
worlds which are revealed and how these undoubtedly are the worlds
in which the soul finds itself when it leaves the body for good.
The next day at l:00 in the afternoon quite suddenly and
unexpectedly my Dad died. He went very quickly and gently and
easily. Very much happened then and in the days immediately
following that I would like to tell you about, but not now and not
in a letter anyhow..."
"I do not have an extra copy of the report on the first
experience but please do if you wish to make a copy from the one
which is available out there for your own use in any way you see
fit."
"Sincerely, Tom"
Friday, January 25, 1957 (my reply)
Dear Tom:
"We were so pleased to have your letter..."
"It was very extraordinary about your father...Sometime I
should like to hear what happened; the death of a man's father is
a very important event in his life and I am sure that there was on
the one hand much involvement...and on the other hand much freeing."
"I have taken you at your word that you wanted to know about
my LSD experience; I feel perhaps that it will be helpful -- if
only to show what people are defending against. With the
postulates for the session -- what I hoped of it -- I asked for
whatever I should have -- for the strength to cope with it-- to
see the problems through..."
"Thank you for permission to reproduce your report and to
have it for very special occasions. It is truly an extraordinary
and freeing and integrating one to read..."
"Al Hubbard came back from Texas -- although everyone
expected him to go straight on north from there. I don't quite
know where our research -- or rather our attempt to get
information from him -- is going, but perhaps we can see him with
a few other patients. As to the project with Sid, it is in
Washington, I guess, to get an okay for the VA. Sid has an office
for me in his building, and he is going to gather some furniture
for us -- a tape recorder, and a phonograph. We can't really
start with subjects until we have the official okay, but it
shouldn't be too long in coming."
"This is so important to me -- it is hard to think about much
else. There is some key to its therapeutic use which lies just
outside our grasp -- but somehow I feel that we have almost all
the pieces assembled and that the insight will eventually come.
If only we can learn to use it with all the power implicit in the
intimations we have seen!"
"Will sends his best to you -- as do I. With affectionate
regards, Betty"
January 29, 1957
Dear Betty,
"Just a note to tell you that your LSD material has arrived
and I would like to ask your permission to keep it for ten days or
perhaps two weeks. I have read the material, but it bears so
directly and powerfully upon areas of this whole problem that I am
most deeply interested in that I want an opportunity to study it
carefully."
"You are a good soldier and a good reporter, Betty. I have
been through exactly the same places you describe so faithfully;
the details of my experience do not match yours of course, but the
essence does. I went there via the use of alcohol, metrazol
shock, and some other means. You went there via LSD. That
doesn't matter. The important thing is to get there -- and to get
through. Not out (that's what the ego is always clamoring for) but
through."
"I think you are coming through -- really, honestly, deeply I
do. And then, when you have come through, the way lies open to
the fulfillment and the incredible joy that the human heart is
really made for..."
Tom
"The key is surrender -- at every stage. Let the ego go; let
it die. It always makes a mess of dying, but what of that?
(Suicide, of course, is not the death of the ego; very much the
contrary. The ego is an awful ham. It always tries to make a
tragedy out of its own death. But this, as everything
egotistical, is also false. At the death of the ego, the real
self laughs. Actually the real self laughs well before the ego-
death and this brings on the happy event as nothing else can. The
ego can not stand being laughed at; it sill go to any lengths to
avoid it.)"
Saturday night -- February 2, 1957
Dear Tom:
"Your two letters came today, and I hasten to answer them.
First -- my very deepest and heartfelt thanks for your kindness
and understanding. I can't tell you how much it means..."
"Of course keep the stuff as long as you need it and find it
helpful. Another chapter will join it toward the end of next
week. Like a dope I made only one copy of the sequel which
occurred last Wednesday. This friend and I both took 25 gamma
expecting to loosen inhibitions and to get further into our
problems. (January 30, 1957) I hoped that I might pick up the
thread of my father relationship and be able to carry it on
further because its unresolvedness has been like acid deep inside.
I was therefore totally unprepared to have a completely positive
experience -- with nothing about problems whatsoever. Just pure
light, integration -- and pleasurableness. But you will see. I
haven't talked to Sid yet, but we are both very curious about the
whys of this -- whether following the problem-solving session --
then the integrating -- or whether the small dosage for me or just
what. We shall have to experiment with this and see because it is
of extreme importance for our work therapeutically. Interestingly
enough, we had given 100 gamma to a psychiatrist the day before --
who had a mixed reaction... I felt guilty I had to leave him
(which we had all known because I had a prior appointment with a
patient) after lunch -- at a time which coincided with Sid's
leaving him for a while. And his feeling of isolation and
depression I think were a direct result of this -- or at least
this intensified it. The one thing I have noticed is that the
subject who takes LSD should be the whole center of attention for
as long as the process goes on and should have any and all
necessary support for as long as he or she needs it. I don't
think Sid realizes this as much as I do, but I've seen it both
objectively and subjectively... also I think it is better when
working therapeutically for only one subject to take the drug. If
people are on the same level -- all right, let several take it --
and it might well be that smaller doses would work just as well.
Dr. Humphry Osmond told me that when he was down, but when I
checked with Hubbard, he said no. But after my experience, I
believe Osmond."
(Discussion of Load Carrying followed in response to his mention
of Contagion)
"For one thing, I have found -- and Sid agrees with me --
that one should not try more than one LSD session a week. It just
takes too much out of you no matter what kind of thing it is. I
know that in these sessions there is some sort of bridge
constructed -- or rather a bridge comes into being between the
subject and me -- they have all spoken of it and talked of how I
knew what was going on in them and they could communicate with
them (me?). I can feel it too, but not as overtly as they think.
However -- this seems to be important for the therapy -- and
through it I seem to operate intuitively as a therapist.
Certainly it is not anything very planned --what is to be said
comes from the unconscious -- and if it is not right, one knows
immediately. Anyway, I find that this demands great psychic
energy -- and as such it would be helpful if there were ways to
channel this -- or help it along..."
"I do thank you for your concern about me. I was very
touched. But perhaps it would help to know that I have worked as
therapist with psychotics, with sexual psychopaths (legal
terminology, not psychological) and naturally with neurotics. I
really feel that although LSD brings much more out much faster, it
is the same process. The interesting feeling I have, however, is
that it is not my experience which is insulating from the
infection -- not the therapeutic experience, that is -- but... the
fact that one knows and feels deep down through the layers of the
unconscious the power of the good and tries to operate out of this
center..."
"Anyway, the important thing I see as a therapist is to give
an individual an LSD experience which combines optimally the
integrative and the problem oriented...I am trying to sort out the
conditions which make it possible. It obviously depends on the
state of the individual, his openness, his own physical and mental
condition as he takes the drug, and on the therapist, too. And
one large and important element is that of trust. In fact, after
my own last experience I would say that this is almost paramount.
Because if we have a bridge of trust from one individual to
another, it can so easily extend to God."
(From a report of 25 gamma session January 30, 1957: "If one can
build a bridge of trust to another human being, then the bridge
needn't be much longer to go to God. Or maybe even shorter. But
suddenly I saw that that was what Al has told us in hundreds of
different ways. He 'processes' people until they trust him
implicitly before he gives them the 'materials' -- or else he
doesn't give it to them...this may very well be a key and crucial
point on which the type of reaction under LSD swings.")
"And now it is late and I am tired and I don't know whether I
am making sense any more or not. But I do want to say one more
thing. Thank you very much for your note about surrender... But
by golly -- until it is over -- just how does one surrender? Not
with the conscious mind, certainly!? And who can control the
unconscious...All I think that I can do is to try to stay open --
and to ask desperately for help from anyone who knows. Friends
can really help at times...Probably, however, the most helpful comes
in the daily exchanges and contacts if relationships are as honest
as they can be..."
"Thank you again for everything...Betty"
Wednesday, February 13 (1957)
Dear Tom:
"It was wonderful -- I can't tell you how wonderful -- to
have you-all here..."
"Of course there is no problem with LSD -- or with those who
work with it (or) don't work with it -- if it is only the means.
When it becomes the end, then the difficulty arises..."
"I have been busy the past few days keeping relationships up
to date -- as you call it... you might like to know that I called
and went out to see Gerald (Heard, English philosopher) this
afternoon. I picked up his reports to classify and told him how
much I needed his help in the work which Sid and I will be
doing... I went on the say that I was sorry about Sunday night and
told him the circumstances...(which) arose from my own questions
about parts of my own experiences and where they fit into the
scheme. The only time that you were mentioned was when he said
that you felt that the difficulty had to do with Al. He went on
to discuss the assembly of people...and he drew the analogy of the
elements...which in combination make gunpowder. Of course in my
naive way I had thought that those of us with deepest concern
about LSD should be gathered to communicate...It is just that the
communication became warped because it was grafted on past
currents and eddies of great strength and force. However, all
seems well...Gerald had to leave for an appointment, so M.G. and I
went for a lovely walk. Her third LSD experience was very similar
to my problem-centered one..."
"I saw Sid today and also my office -- which begins to look
like a habitable (though far from esthetic) place...I think that the
large sessions will be held away from the hospital...I'm going to
start seeing our first subject soon; also I plan a trip to Long
Beach to see the head of the VA Hospital1 there who has been using
LSD therapeutically with great success (reported) on all kinds and
number of patients in group situations. Then Sid gave me a brief
report of 500 LSD sessions on 40 patients at Pinebluff Sanitarium,
Pinebluff, North Carolina which reports many of the improvements
which we have noticed with therapy..."
"Driving home from dropping you off at the Miramar I had the
sudden flash that -- although you speak well about knowing that
you are unable to help W. (W. Wilson, founder of A.A.) the words
are not yet synchronized to the music. This may not be an
accurate observation and I offer it only tentatively..."
"Please give our best regards to W. and tell him that it was
a real pleasure to meet as interesting, extraordinary, and
powerful (and challenging as a problem to himself and others)
person as he..."
"With love from us both, Betty"
(From LSD report of February 16, 1957, which turned out to be the
1 1 The head of the VA Hospital was Oscar Janiger, MD who made an
extraordinary contribution with his world-wide work. He was
fascinated by LSD and gave it to whomever he could, possibly
between 200 and 1000 doses. He had artists do painting of kachina
dolls before and after LSD sessions. Oz said he planned on
studying creative people and their reactions to their sessions.
first group session we ever did):
"When I talked to Tom about his coming out...the idea of all of
us taking 25 gamma experimentally to see what would happen. Since
all of us had had it at least once -- in larger doses, it would be
interesting, I thought, to see what the small dose would do... So
unconsciously or rather half consciously I probably had hopes of
help from Tom either in the problem area or in the integrative..."
"But when W.W. (Wilson) walked into the den...I knew this was
his session..."
"Sid was waiting for us in his office at the hospital and
there were warm greetings to Tom and W. At 12:20 we took the
drug...W. had taken 50 gamma -- the rest of us 25. When offered the
little blue pills and was told by Sid to take what he wanted, he
said -- 'Never say that to a drunk,' and took two...it was 35
minutes later when he said he felt stirred by the music, and 10
minutes after that when he began talking. Throughout the session
he rarely would admit feeling the drug or its action, but about
the time he started talking quite a bit in a more relaxed way his
face changed, he looked much younger, and the tension began to
go."
"Tom and I took alternating roles of therapists; Sid for the
most part sat very quietly. I felt pulled in different directions
at times by the three of them...the problems seemed to be in the
mother-father area from the masculine aspect. Sid was very open
to the whole thing...and I felt that many of the things which were
said to W. he felt were said to him, too. And Tom seemed to
identify a great deal with the problem and at one point cried. W.
came close only twice -- once in relation to his mother and once
with his father, I believe. I kept having the feeling that my
role was that of therapist -- this wasn't my time to experience
the drug, and then I consequently examined myself as to whether
this were a defense against the drug..."
"...Gregorian Chants, and these moved Tom profoundly. He
seemed to take onto himself the suffering of humanity and
particularly with respect to a mental hospital...I think he actually
was open to the surrounding suffering and as such felt it. This
is important with respect to where we hold our massive LSD
experiments..."
"I hesitate to enter into the dynamics of the problem(s) as
they were uncovered. I do think that there were two important
parts, though -- W.'s experience of himself as unloved -- and the
perception that it was not through himself but because of his
parents that this occurred...It was interesting to see how the
therapy went -- at times I felt that Tom jumped too many levels
and lost W.; at times he felt that I was off the beam..."
"At about four or shortly after W. seemed to be coming out
and rebuilding his defenses (but one can still get through, Tom --
as we found at dinner: both Will and I did.)...Sid had to go to a
military ball, and so we decided to leave. Now that the session
was over, I suddenly began to feel the drug -- four hours after I
had taken it. (Both Tom and I had full LSD reactions 5 hours
after the drug had been administered.)...I really didn't feel that I
should drive, but W. is ticky in LA and Tom wasn't in much better
shape than I. So I crawled down San Vicente concentrating on all
aspects of driving and had a terrible time figuring out where to
go...But we finally made it to Tali's, and while we sat drinking and
talking the drug really hit me. The color and room approached and
receded in waves -- it was just like the first time I had had the
drug from the sensory aspect -- the slugging on the back of the
head, the nausea, etc. And I knew I was in for a bad reaction
because there wasn't the concomitant freeing experience."
"I felt progressively worse as we came home -- and since the
sitter had to leave almost immediately, I was projected like a
missile into the domestic situation. Nothing was done that should
have been done, and everything was a mess, which I tried to keep
from Tom and W. (the old perfect hostess operating) and I felt
worse and worse and worse...But I couldn't put a name or reason to
it -- there didn't seem to be anything related to my suffering...I
had to retire to the bedroom...I sobbed and sobbed in terrible
anguish over -- I didn't know what! And I still don't really.
Tom suggested that it might have been a reaction from the session
since I was carrying a heavy load of masculinity -- one of me and
three of them..."
"So -- Will came home and we had drinks -- hard and soft --
and talked and talked. And then to the Miramar for dinner where
Will really got through to W. a couple of times on the bridge
between them of depression. I got through to him once, too,
although Tom didn't think we could do it... And we talked about
trust, and the difficulty is that W. doesn't trust anybody: he
can't let them close because he doesn't trust himself -- that he
may kill them, in effect. Because those of us with 'paranoid'
tendencies will kill before being killed, and the 'depressive'
will kill himself first. And I think that is all there is to
different psychiatric classifications in this area. And perhaps
there is only one: the ego when attacked will defend itself to the
death. And this violence and basic urge to kill (basic to the
ego, not the self) is so appalling to the 'depressive' that he
shrinks back and turns the point of the weapon toward himself
while the 'paranoid' on the other had tries to rationalize it and
make a pretty picture of it for society or whoever to see..."
"And when we got home at one or after I was still so
disturbed and upset and in such suffering I cooked until 3 and
soon I felt peace and release and back to creative reality again.
Cooking is a sacrament; I never knew before."
February 26, 1957
Dear Betty,
"I wrote a brief note the other day... I've had too much work
the past six weeks, and I'm really a little punchy."
"Your report of our 25g session came today, together with the
earlier report. I'll return all of these along with the other
material I have to send back to you..."
"I think both you and Will are wonderfully good for W.
because you are among the very few people who are interested
enough and loving enough to deal with him forthrightly and outside
of the highly forced and artificial context of his position in
A.A. Something did him a whale of a lot of good -- obviously,
visibly so -- while he was out there this last time, and I think
you and the LSD are very largely responsible..."
"The great thing about LSD for me is that it permits the
realization that Reality is here and now and that only the
thinnest kind of dream separates the ego-bound consciousness from
the always-existent free child of God. Our experience together
was no exception, and I am grateful to have been with you and Will
in your lovely home when the clearest of the glimpse was open to
me."
"Something persists after the experience, too, and it
persists this time more strongly than before. The drug is a
wonderful help but it is a crutch, and I'm sure the time would
come when the crutch would not longer be needed."
"My love to Will." Tom
March 22, 1957
Dear Folks,
"Please forgive this late response in thanking you both for
all the friendship you gave me so freely on my last trip to the
Coast. More often than you can guess, I have continued to think
of you."
"Since returning home I have felt - and hope have acted! -
exceedingly well. I can make no doubt that the Eisner-Cohen-
Powers-LSD therapy has contributed not a little to this happier
state of affairs."
"It looks like the contract for our television show is about
to be signed. One of the best things about this is that it may
bring Tom and me within sight and sound of you both once more."
Devotedly yours, W. (W. Wilson)
April 13, 1957
Dear Betty,
"Thanks for you(r) letter. Sorry for this delay in
answering..."
"Thank you very much for the memorandum on the conditions
contributing to an optimum LSD session. It is helpful,
particularly with our meeting in June coming up here. Do send
along anything you think would be of help. My interest continues
to be very, very keen. The total effect of the three sessions on
me has been striking, and steady. It has profoundly changed me
for the good; and the change extends to a considerable extent to
the physical level; a bad allergic situation which had existed for
ten years is about 95% cleared up and slowly improving more with
time. W. is strongly affected for the good. Everyone notices how
much better he is. He himself is very happy about it and realizes
clearly what it is that has done it."
"We are all very excited about Sid's coming here. Let me
know what is happening there. Best to Will and the kids."
Love, Tom
Thursday, April 18 (1957)
Dear Tom:
"I hope you won't mind my answering your letter so quickly..."
"I have thought of you so often -- and come so close to
writing you to ask for your help. But things seem better now, and
I hope that I am past that part. But I have walked so close to
insanity, Tom -- and it was only my responsibilities which at
times seemed to hold me back from driving a car over a cliff. I
guess I took so much guilt so fast -- and then environmental
conditions seemed to converge on me...But as I said, events
changed...and also I have been reading up on conversions (both Sid
and I have because it bears on the LSD work and also on
schizophrenia.) And half of the world's conversions have no
element of feeling of personal sin at all. That is our heritage
from Christianity -- and also especially the Reformation and
Luther and Calvin. But no matter. Oh yes, one more important
insight -- the Gregorian Chants are not good LSD music; they have
invariably projected the subject into strong feelings of guilt,
just as they did you that day: that was the Chants you got the
reaction to -- not the hospital -- because I have had it happen
several times until I realized what it was. The music is very
important: if the subject doesn't have any preferences, I've found
a Mantovani record of classical selections is good to start -- and
then Chopin's first piano concerto is better than anything. Pablo
Casal's Kol Nidrei is good, too, and several of Beethoven's
concertos. Also some Mozart -- just so it isn't done
mechanically. I want to talk to you about this at length. In
fact I have a number of things to say about LSD sessions but
tonight I'm very tired. I had a session yesterday, and another
today, and then I had a post LSD subject in and a meeting last
night. I'm handling the session(s) by myself most of the time
now..."
"We seem to have hit on the technique of getting people past
any possible bad effects of a session with the graduated dosage
sessions. But must run a larger sample. I feel we can do it for
anyone -- if one is willing to risk the investment of time and
energy -- any non-psychotics, that is, because I don't know about
them."
"Will joins me in sending best -- and bless you for your
letter." Betty
April 27, 1957
Dear Betty,
"Sorry to hear that you have had a few rocky spells lately.
But I am not surprised. I think you are carrying a very large
load. An LSD session in which one takes the kind of interest and
responsibility that you do is liable to draw off a lot of energy
and vitality. I do hope you will not over-do."
"I still have more work than I can do right, but it is nearly
all work that I love and I am glad to have it..."
"My love to Will. And please do not try to do too much too
soon. This LSD work is hard work and difficult work, and I think
the first saying of A.A. applies very directly to it: Easy does
it. Tom"
May 14, 1957
Dear Tom:
"Again bless you for your letter..."
"I am not working too hard -- really don't think I am. It's
just that life has had a whole lot of things piling up for me just
recently. At the moment it isn't overwhelming. But if you
remember, I told you and W. that I wasn't ready for this work; my
children are too young, etc. And you both laughed and said it was
always that way. On top of everything else there has been great
difficulty in getting responsible and kindly women to stay with
the children. And as you know, I feel my first responsibility is
to them and to Will -- workwise, that is."
"Of course the main difficulty is myself and the particular
problems I am trying to work through. One does the best one can.
I eagerly await your arrival out here -- whenever -- so that I can
take one more LSD..."
"This week I start a hospital patient and a patient who did
not benefit at the alcoholic clinic... So we go into the
pathologies, and I'm excited to see how it goes. I hope my
feeling of confidence is borne out. I really feel, Tom that we
have the method licked. But we need more cases to test this. And
we are planning a really long-range study with other therapists
too, if we can get the details worked out, because we feel this is
so important. If it's to be, it will."
"Best love to you. Will would join me, except that he is in
Washington on his way to Orlando, Florida for some military
meetings along with a whole bunch from Rand. Betty"
P.S. "Work is also a defense for me: when things go awry if I can
do helpful work the situation mends."
Thursday, June 6, 1957
Dear Tom:
"...I have just finished my third session, today, in as many
days...The man today is finished after four sessions -- he didn't
really need the fourth one, but he went higher and experienced
more deeply. This was my first hospital patient and it was his
second hospitalization (last 1954) and now he seems a different
man. It makes one very humble and joyful."
"I await your arrival with eagerness. If you can possibly
arrange it, could you manage to wait until after the fourth of
July? I have a heavy schedule as a man is coming down from Palo
Alto the week of the 24th for three treatments; the week of the
17th will be Sid's first week back at the hospital and I am
scheduled for three sessions then, too..."
"Come as much ahead as you can spare the time -- sit in on a
session with me if you like -- or anything that would be helpful.
And save one day for me. I await your arrival eagerly (now I'm
repeating myself). Best love from us both -- Betty"
Western Union June 25, 1957:
TRIP POSTPONED UNTIL AUGUST LETTER FOLLOWS TOM
Saturday, June 29, (1957)
Dear Tom:
"I didn't know how much your coming meant to me until I had
your wire that the plans were changed."
"Is there any possibility that you and W. Wilson might be
coming out on the TV show? In July? You see, I'm leading a
psychotherapeutic seminar for the Rathbuns (Sequoia Seminar) in
Ben Lomond from August 18th to August 25th... After the seminar we
have a few days in Los Angeles and then leave for New York. Our
American Psychological Association meetings are over Labor Day,
and I think I'm going to be presenting a paper. I'll be in New
York from about the 30th to September 5th; Will will go down to
Washington on business after a few days in New York and I'll join
him there. I was hoping to see you while I was back there, but it
wouldn't do for my LSD session. Nor would it work between Ben
Lomond and New York..."
"Is it at all possible to make your trip the first part of
August rather than the latter?"
"Thomas Merton just isn't a substitute for Thomas Powers --
much as some of his things help."
"With love, and please let me know. Betty"
July 17, (1957)
Dear Betty,
"Yes, it will be very good to be with you again. A lot has
been happening both here and there. I'm sure we won't have
anywhere near enough time to get talked out, but we'll make a dent
in the situation anyhow."
"The greatest effect of the LSD experience for me has come in
the past two or three months. A lot of what I knew under LSD is
coming back, not as a permanent state, but as quite steady
intermittent awareness. It isn't like a recurrence of the
experience, of course, but it comes pretty close to it. The net
result is a drastic de-problemizing of my whole life. Things are
still tough here and there, but it is a matter of dealing with
conditions, not problems. It is hard to describe, but the
connection with LSD is unmistakable. I think it will be years
before we really begin to know what the possibilities of this
experience are."
"Love to all. Tom"
July 15, 1957
Dear Zip:
"It was good to have your letter in May and to have more
direct news of you from Sid..."
"Both Sid and I are extremely grateful to you for your
confidence on our LSD work as demonstrated by the extension of the
grant. As the main (or should I say sole?) beneficiary of it, I
want to thank you especially. And I guess Sid wrote you that he
put through a rise in rate and a change from 16 to 20 hours. I
leave all that up to him because I love the work so much and find
it so fascinating...all the ideas appearing on schizophrenia,
hypnosis, the mystic experience, and all the rest. I think we
have a pretty good idea now of how to make it work for almost
everyone (psychotics excepted) and the point now is to demonstrate
on a number of patients. Which I hope to continue to do. In the
fall we plan to limit ourselves almost exclusively to hospital
patients for several reasons: not the least of which is that they
are easier to discuss when trying to communicate what we have
learned..."
"And so -- until some time in August -- our best good wishes,
and again all sorts of thanks for everything."
"Affectionately, Betty Eisner"
(A number of letters between Tom and Betty about plans for the
coming visit and the scheduling of activities)
LSD SESSION -- Wednesday, August 28, 1957. These are from both
my and Tom's notes. Tom's notes are marked with "'", mine with
""" and direct quotations are marked with "'"; my interpolations
are marked with "()".
"My memories today of the session are vivid but limited.
First I was in `hell' and in pain for what seemed like one
eternity after another. Finally, when I had made up my mind that
I would be in hell forever and accepted that fact, it was over.
And then I remember going to `heaven' which was beautiful clouds
and `cosmic' scenes which turned out to be nauseating to me, and
meaningless. Out of this grew the Tower of Babel with everyone
speaking their own language and no one understanding anyone else.
I can't remember the transition, but the awareness grew in me that
something had to be done about dependency."
There was a great deal on dependency/addiction. Besides the
importance of experiencing the unreality of both "hell" and
"heaven" was the insight that I must make a symbolic sacrifice so
that I could communicate with my mother (a very difficult job). I
hit upon giving up alcohol, a valid symbol of
dependency/addiction. Following the session I didn't drink any
liquor for a year and a half. This "sacrifice" actually did
enable me to get along with my mother until her (to me) entirely
unnecessary death, which she seemed to bring on herself by
insisting on an incorrect operation and then dying on her wedding
anniversary from the embolism which followed.
"75 gamma taken at 9:18 a.m." Tom listed the music which was
used during the session.
"I lay in silence almost for the whole first two hours. I
can remember the first powerful impression I had was of Tom. I
said 'I can feel you, Tom; you're an extremely powerful person.'
To which he replied that he could feel me, too. I can remember
wishing that he would play the music in certain order but feeling
that I shouldn't interfere. Finally I asked him to put on the
Chopin first concerto...then the Beethoven Fifth Concerto."
"It may have been the Beethoven. During this time I was
feeling the action of the drug. I felt first a sort of
disengagement -- a going with the music. And I remember that the
field in front of my eyes was of the color of eyelids with light
shining against them. Slowly I became aware of the fact that my
body felt as though it were disintegrating. This proceeded very
smoothly until the process got to my head. There was trouble
there: it was too hard. I remember smiling about this. In fact I
reacted with smiles at times and at other times tears slipped down
my cheeks, and sometimes they made a river..."
"About this time I began to feel pain in the back of my head
and also in my left arm and hand... It was as though I were being
told that I must see, and yet I was not allowed to see. In other
words that I must see what there was to be seen, but I was not
allowed to understand it -- to see it with all the logical
questions answered. The pain in my arm became excruciating and as
I tried to `see' what I was supposed to...elbow bending, or the
alcoholic, of dependency...The pain was almost unbearable, and...I
became aware that I was to consider myself an alcoholic -- just
like Tom. That it was involved in my dependency problem, and that
I had to be content to accept the pain and allow it to continue
forever with no way out. But the pain was too great; I couldn't
bear it alone. So I finally asked Tom to put his hand under my
left elbow where it was at its worst..."
ll:ll 'Wants T.P. to put hand on (under) left elbow briefly.
Says will explain later. Says is a good joke on her.'
'`The purgation of the alcoholic...will explain it later. It
is hell being an alcoholic.''
"`I am an alcoholic.'"
'`Everyone is an alcoholic -- Wherever the dependencies are,
whether family, children, or whatever.'' (Dependency leads to
addiction.)
'`I ran right up against Jehovah of the Old Testament....Guilt
is not just in the person or the personal unconscious. A cosmic
thing -- involving other lives. Even hell is pleasant, if you
accept it.''...
He did not say pleasant, as I remember, but that it can be
tolerated. And in order to go through an experience, one must
accept that experience as though it is for the rest of life and as
though there will be no other.
'`There is a place where one is not allowed humor. Because
that is also an escape.''
"`I know. I have been there.'"...
'`I keep thinking of Job. You can't understand him, just
live through it.'' (This is being broken on the cosmic wheel,
which I was.)...
11:35 '`We are brother and sister. A cosmic relationship.''
(Working out of sibling business on here and now level, too. As
Tom says, when all the levels are in line -- the here and now up
to the cosmic -- that is the reality. Also seeing kinship of
where we are and what we are doing.)
ll:50 '`These worlds seen in LSD are not the Reality. They
are designs. We (T. and B.) know that there is only one Reality.
Dependency has to be burned out.''
'`Other levels are kind of nauseating. Hell is not the only
false level. All these other levels are not important, not
real....''
"`The Maya of the Tree of Life.'
'B. gets a bad taste for some of these levels -- archetypes,
etc.' (Heaven is as nauseating as hell is painful. There is only
one reality --God. That is all that counts.)
12:20 '`In time, we cover up the crying need to live with
God, masking it under the dependencies, and then hating the
dependencies.''
"Addiction is not necessary or desirable. (I think what I
said was that addiction arose when one misinterprets the one
dependency as being other than on God; then addiction follows
inevitably.) Responsibility is the important thing..."
12:25"...`The cosmic levels are magnificent. But they are just
smoke.'..."
"Have to accept heaven and hell. Other was painful, the hell
experience. This is nauseating. This is heaven, but it is smoke,
too. Have to be willing to live in it, knowing it's not the real.
It is wrong to cling to religion." (I had to accept and be
willing to live on the symbolic or heaven level even if that were
all there were.)
"The wheel. The cycle of rebirths. The Maya. Why the
illusion? Must be willing to live in each level."
1:30 "`It is all a process of purification to make us able
to love... Unless we've lived through it in the here and now, we
can't love...The only horror is not to be able to love. We make all
our mistakes because we do not love each other...Have to take up our
burden in the here and now and clean up.'" (Clean up one's own
dynamics.)
1:35 "Still `stuck in heaven'. Experiencing heaven as
`purgation'. ..." (Nauseating.)
'B. thinks she may have to give up drinking... Sees the
implications (of giving up) all the way up to the top and all the
way down to the bottom.'
"`I never have seen it this way before.'..."
4:10 "`How many lifetimes I have lived today!'"
4:30 "`The whole idea of ritual sacrifice. Give up drinking
not to save your soul, but lovingly for someone else.'" (And not
for any rational reason, but simply because the evidence presented
is overwhelming that it must be done although the reason why is
not vouchsafed. And this sacrifice was for mother.)
"Marked difference in level. Much more use of the scanning
and rational facility -- return to a much less deep level."
"Discussion: whether there is a pattern to going into and
coming out of the experience."
4:50 "And then M. came and she could see what I had been
through. And when I described the long purgation, Tom couldn't
believe that I had been through at least two solid hours of pain.
`But you looked so peaceful,' he said. Tom was tired, and M. took
over. It is good to have someone fresh come in at the end to take
over and carry the subject further. And the next four days were
the ecstatic and the light. And I needed an enormous amount of
sleep for the following week. I tired greatly and my arm was very
sore. And since then I have felt the boiling of the internal
levels, settling down to the alcoholic restriction. With luck
they should settle within three to four months, as they did with
the smoking before. But we shall see."
The schedule was a busy one that August: Monday, August 26,
Tom arrived by train and Zip by plane. On the 27 Zip took LSD at
Gerald Heard's, with Gerald, Tom, and Sid there (I was not invited
to these Gerald Heard sessions; the all-male sessions didn't seem
to want an interfering feminine touch). On Wednesday, August 28 I
had my just-described LSD session with Tom sitting with me. And
the next day, Tom took mescaline at Gerald's with Zip present.
September 4, 1957
Dear Betty and Will:
"It was so good to see you if only so briefly; and I feel
that I owe you an explanation of why I was so withdrawn on
Monday."
"For some time prior to going to California I had been under
a good deal of pressure; getting only about six hours sleep a
night. Then I flew out on an overnight coach getting no sleep.
This was my only vacation so I had counted on doing some relaxing
out there. But I found myself on the go more than I was able to
handle. So my nerves were rather jagged. Finally, the L.S.D.
experience opened up some areas that were rather intimate and
personal. And the "ego" was counter-attacking, which I was not
fully aware of until afterward. As a result I now realize that I
may have created an impression that was very far from my
intentions and true feelings. If I did I hope you will accept my
apologies."
"I hope to be back in California between Christmas and New
Years and am looking forward to seeing you then. Meantime my fond
regards and wishes for all the best of everything to both of you."
Sincerely Zip
September 11, 1957
Dear Zip:
"Thank you for your very sweet letter of the 4th. Of course
we understood about your being so busy when you were out..."
"Actually, I've found that I'm not good for much of anything
in the practical sense after taking LSD..."
"I don't know whether this is pertinent or not, but I should
like to try to communicate to you something as have learned from
the research which you have so generously made possible: and that
is the extreme value of the low doses (25 and 50 gamma) for
clearing up the personal problem areas which are of a pressing
nature so that the large dosage LSD experiences can be really
creative and integrating. There is also a symbolic and guardian
level which must be penetrated, but it yields to traversing with
devoted friends once the here and now problems have been
understood and largely cleared up. I hope that these observations
will be helpful to you..."
"Meanwhile best of everything, and take it easy so you can
get the good of your LSD work."
"Sincerely, Betty"
(Alas, Zip was unable to profit from the research he had made
possible! Only large dosages, and no "therapist" present.)
October 2, 1957
Dear Tom:
"This has been a long time in the writing; my desk is still
piled with things I didn't get done before my seminar."
"But I do want to thank you for all the wonderful help you
gave me in my LSD session. I never would have made it as I did
without your help. I hope someday to be able to type up your
notes. Do you want a copy then -- or at least to see it?"
"Enclosed is a blue line of our current LSD thinking which I
have just revised. You will find that there is not much
fundamental change, but there are some additions which are
important to put into writing."
`I've been getting some very interesting things in sessions
lately: did several Sequoia Seminar people, and they were very
remarkable One a full experience on his first 25 gamma session --
and reenacting many of the Freudian-posited dynamics on the way,
but going far beyond that. I'm glad we have all these on tape."
"Have you started work yet? Do let me have news of what goes
on. We are having two sessions a week, and sometimes I can manage
three if they are 25 gamma ones. Hope to get the article in shape
before too long. In checking up our subjects seem to show
continued change for the better. Which is very exciting."
"Best love to you and it was wonderful to see you in August.
Betty"
10/10/57
Dear Betty,
"Thanks for `current thinking on LSD'; it is very good and
will be really helpful if and when something gets going in the way
of actual sessions here..."
"I was a long time getting back to normal after the mescaline
experience this time. This one was a real earthquake, and some
pretty large chunks of life were shaken up and are even now still
settling... I have great difficulty this time in trying to say
anything about the experience. I just feel that everything I say
is wrong; not false but hopelessly and almost offensively
inadequate."
"Your work sounds even more exciting than ever, particularly
the fact that the subjects continue over a period of time to show
change for the better."
"Affectionate regards to Will and the kids, and to Sid, to
whom I shall be writing one day soon. Tom"
1/30/58
Dear Betty,
"Good to get your note."
"When Sid and I looked in on your patient and particularly
during the time I held her hand, I felt a tragedy in the process
of being resolved. Then I saw clearly something that was very
like Blake's picture of the light angel subduing and binding the
dragon. Enclosed is a report on my own last LSD experience."
"Hello to Will and the kids."
"Love, Tom"
February 28, 1958
Dear Tom:
"Thank you for your note and the report. I was very moved by
it. It is such beautiful simplicity and so full of what it is.
It was a bridge for me, also."
"I was interested in the description of what was happening
with my patient. You were so right. I was almost out of energy
when you came in, and it took both of us and Sid, too, to pull the
trick. She had one final session in SF with a group and hit the
mystical transcendence and is now cured. But without that
particular session I don't think she could have."
"We are publishing the article and hope soon to have it
submitted for publication. It goes well and is fun to write with
Sid."
"We plan to come East the 15th of April... I would like to
see you if you are not too busy around that time... I also want to
see Dr. Denber at Manhattan State Hospital if he is not in Rome.
Otherwise we shall be visiting friends..."
"I want muchly to discuss the integrative experience and its
effectiveness, personality-wise, too. Best to you from us all.
Love, Betty"
Sunday, June 8, 1958
Dear Tom:
"...I was deeply sorry not to have seen W. Wilson; at the
hospital they didn't know we were just back from the Midwest.
Please tell him to call us at home next time..."
"I have been looking for an office and picking up my
practice. Also trying to get some of my thoughts on paper. If
the Rome trip works out (that I can get away, that is) I would
like to go SAS directly and then come back via NY and then I would
see you then..."
"There are a number of interesting things going on: foremost
is the fact that I am getting LSD-like phenomena (low dose
equivalents) without the drug at all. It is relatively easy in
people who have had LSD, either with or without music, but I have
one patient who has never had any sort of drug like this and who
does wonderfully. It certainly does speed the therapeutic process
for those who are open to interpretations of their own symbolism.
Several friends who have had LSD are also noticing this with their
patients."
"Had lunch with Sid the other day and it was great fun. Our
article has been submitted to J. of Nerv. and Ment. Dis. and this
month we give the paper in SF at the AMA. He is very kindly
letting me read it, which I shall enjoy. I hope to give several
sessions in SF; have been away from the drug too long with only a
couple of sessions since March. And I find it makes a difference.
Have talked to Gerald but not seen him, but I did have lunch with
Aldous Huxley and we talked about drug work, what should be done,
and I asked his advice on all the material I have which I think
would be helpful if in print. There is a writer who is interested
too, Anais Nin, and we are going to see what might be possible.
She had quite an extraordinary inward-turning, creative
experience."
"It would be lovely to be able to see you; barring that to
talk to you. But sooner or later you will be out or I shall be
back. Until then we all send you our best love. Plus heartfelt
wishes for a lightening of your load."
"Regards to Zip and W. Wilson. Love, Betty"
Two notes from Anais Nin:
Dear Betty Eisner:
"As I am leaving for Europe for July and August (leaving June
23), I am sending you these books for yourself, and I hope we will
see each other when I return. I was very impressed by your
attitude as to the positive value of LSD -- and hope I can give
you some support as a writer, or in publishing -- at least
believing in you!"
Anais Nin
July 8, 1958
Dear Anais Nin:
"I don't think you would have dreamed of how much your note
and the books did for me. Just after I had written you that we
would see you soon, I was called in the middle of the night and
told that my mother had died very unexpectedly..."
"Somehow your books and your kindness conveyed a special
message to me when I returned..."
"I was particularly touched and quickened by what you had
written on the fly leaves. I suppose I had never thought
particularly of it outside of my own psychological bias, but it
had not occurred to me that one would render less creative by
analysis. I can see how this thought would arise within the
confines of resistance or lack of knowledge; however, if such a
process occurred, it would be because the creativity of the
individual was made available through neurotic means, rather than
through an opening process. And if the analysis or whatever
process of maturing were continued far enough, I should think that
the creativity would reappear, many times refreshed. I know
nothing of your life, although somewhere back in the recesses
rings a tiny bell which connects you with Henry Miller and with
that time of his life in Paris. I have found him an inspired
writer, and one time Will and I, accompanied by Rajagopal who took
us there, called on him high on the hill of Big Sur. He had been
asleep and he awakened so gently and so penetratingly insightfully
that the afternoon is framed in my remembrance... So there is some
part of you which fits in there somewhere, I think..."
"Next, I was struck by your observation that your analysis
was your method by which the negative aspects were prevented from
taking over in an individual always close to her unconscious.
This is extremely meaningful to me and I should very much like to
pursue it sometime at length with you. Sid and I...had an LSD study
all set to try to get some insights into creativity by the use of
painting and artists as contrasted with the paintings of
schizophrenics at the hospital. Alas, the National Institute of
Mental Health had other places for its grants..."
"There is another whole aspect by which the negative can
become understood and used creatively instead of being limiting
and destructive: this has become clearer to me with continuing
experience with LSD. I think this occurs when the individual
makes contact with the deep Innerness -- call it what you will --
which lies within us all and which probably has some common
ground. Perhaps it is something as simple as what Dr. Osmond
calls the transdimensional vector: love...LSD when used properly
enables the individual to make contact with this and to experience
it so that life can become very different..."
"I am also finding that for certain levels of the
unconscious, drugs are not necessary. I know this has been self
evident for you all your life, but for those of us who never had
an image, a vision, or a fantasy in color until LSD, it is a
revelation that such an infinity of worlds exists within us,
accessible to us at almost any time under proper conditions..."
"With great affection and gratitude. Betty"
(Undated; probably December, 1958)
Dear Betty:
"I didn't write you after your gracious dinner because I
thought you were leaving for Mexico -- and I was so touched when I
received your letter - Particularly when I know how busy you are -
This was the first year when faced with growing burdens of
correspondence I gave up sending holiday greetings - perhaps also
because I felt they can be offered all through the year."
"I was very exhilarated by our talk. I feel that you are
very creative in your work with a fine blend of intellect and
intuition. And you do write well. And in yourself there is the
aliveness which could make these experiments fascinating. I do
want to help you with your book in any way I can -- even if it is
only as a fiction writer encouraging the case history to put on
flesh, color and identity - It is time we reject the convention of
fiction itself and unravel the truth about human beings, but it is
true we have to bring to it the artistry which makes the truth
alive - We have a lot to talk about and so little time. Both of
us fulfill our women's role and you besides that of a mother --
but let us not for lack of strength or time, lose contact - If you
are able to get your cases to fill out - perhaps I can then help
you with suggestions - Some evening when R. plays near you I'll
run in for another talk -"
"Affectionately, Anais"
Tuesday, August 12, 1958
Dear Tom:
"Your letter was carried up to Ben Lomond with me in the fond
hope that I could answer it there. Actually it arrived when I was
in Kansas City because of the unexpected death of my mother.
Fortunately we had been back there in late April and early May and
she had had two weeks with Maleah and DB who were her real loves.
Her death was one of those unnecessary and completely unexpected
things medically... Thanks to you and the session of just about a
year ago I was able to handle it all. You will never know how
grateful I have been for that session on so many levels, Tom; it
really was an extraordinary one."
"As far as my plans now are, subject to anything happening
such as measles, I leave here Sunday, August 4th and go directly
to London. A couple of days in Worchester with Sandison, a couple
in London with Dr. Ling, I hope a day in Hamburg with Frederking,
some time with my brother and friends, then Rome on the 7th. The
conference is the 8th to 12; my paper is on the 12th...then I have
alternative routes home. One is go to London and back over the
pole; the other has me leaving Rome the 14th, I think, for New
York... The whole trip is very delicate, and I must feel my way
along. But IF all goes well, and IF I can make it home via NY, I
have planned the two days so that I can be just with you...I have a
great deal more information about the drug -- and in fact about
doing the same thing as 25 or 50 gamma sessions without any drug
at all. We call this deep fantasy out here and a number of us who
have worked with LSD are able to do it for patients..."
"I also want to write Humphry (Osmond) before you and W.
Wilson go there...Give him a big hug for me; he has kept me alive in
heart during many dry times of these last few years. He is a
wonderful person, and really knows about love -- which, after all,
Tom, is all there is worth knowing about. I think all the rest of
this we do is just embellishment on the theme -- and usually the
theme of resistance."
"The seminar this summer was remarkable in many respects, one
of which was the level of drug dosage. We used 10 gamma two days,
interspersed with 22 mg. of mescaline and 5 mg. of methedrine two
other days. Then the group had 25 gamma (except two refractory
ones had 50 gamma) and I 10 the last day. It was the most
remarkable group sessions I have ever seen for getting down to
basic dynamics. I'll try to write some clues to Humphry you might
use in AA groups. Certainly I think low dosages are your answer -
- particularly things like methedrine which open rapport among
people -- plus a little mescaline if 10 gamma LSD is hard to
get...Best love to you, Tom, and let me know your plans. Betty
The kids are wonderfully well -- growing muchly -- very great
fun."
It was August of 1958, and I was in transition: we had
finished the research at the V.A., and I was getting my own office
and going into private practice. Also, I was on my way to Rome
to give my very own paper on LSD. Pretty exhilarating.
But before we go sailing off to new worlds to conquer, it
seems appropriate to see what our research had been about.
When we started "treating" the subjects of our research at
the Brentwood V.A. to examine the therapeutic potential of the new
drug LSD, the first session we gave them only 25 gamma of LSD,
approximately one-fourth the amount that I had taken in each of my
LSD sessions. And while it wasn't enough for the strongly-
defended subjects (the alcoholic, the salesman, and the schizoid),
it worked well for the majority of the 22 subjects we had in our
initial study. And if the 25 gamma wasn't effective that first
session, a week later the 50 gamma was, or certainly the 75 gamma
the third week. Because we met the subjects weekly, and raised
the dosage each time until we reached 100 or 125 gamma in most
cases, and 250 gamma with a few recalcitrant subjects. At the
time, incidentally, we didn't know anything about Ron Sandison's
work in England where he started with 25 gamma with patients at
Powick Hospital and gradually increased the dosage. But we found
out from his articles, from letters, and then, finally, by
visiting him in England.
Dr. Ronald Sandison worked with Drs. Spencer and Whitelaw at
Powick Hospital north of London, where a whole ward of the
hospital was reserved for patients undergoing LSD therapy. While
their dosages began at 25 gamma, sometimes they increased more
rapidly than we, and sometimes went as high as 150 to 400 gamma.
Their "team" consisted of a psychiatrist, nurses who stayed with
the patients through the whole session, and therapists who
conducted group therapy between drug sessions. Two-thirds of
their 94 patients were reported improved with follow-up periods of
six months to five years. However, "We would stress that all our
cases were in danger of becoming permanent mental invalids,
lifelong neurotics or suicides." (Sandison, R.A., Spencer, Andy
and Whitelaw, J.D.A.. The therapeutic value of lysergic acid
diethylamide in mental illness. J. Ment. Sc. 100: 491-507, 1954.)
Dr. Joyce Martin, also in England, treated 50 chronic
neurotic outpatients at a day hospital with gradually increasing
doses of LSD and found lasting improvement two years later of 68%.
"The therapeutic effect of LSD-25 would appear to be in the
reliving of early experiences, particularly if accompanied by
release of repressed feeling... the presence of the psychiatrist
helps him to act out and work through the experience in an
environment of security not present at the original experience."
(Martin, A.J. LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide) treatment of
chronic psychoneurotic patients under day-hospital conditions.
Internat. J. Social Psychiat., 3; 188-195, 1957.)
Alas, there is no readily-available record of Tom Ling's work
which was carried out primarily in private practice in London.
Our own experience was somewhat the same and somewhat
different. Because earlier reports of Al Hubbard had shown that
the setting and the people present made a difference in the
experience the subjects had under LSD, we fixed up a hospital room
to be as attractive as possible. (In fact, it ended up not
looking like a hospital room at all.
Al had found music to be effective in enhancing the action of
the drug, which we corroborated personally and with our first
subjects. In fact, we found that the type of music and the period
when it was played in a session could have a profound effect. We
developed a set of pieces, mostly classical, which aided the drug
in its effectiveness and direction. Also, we let subjects bring
their own music, which sometimes was helpful, sometimes not. We
found that "light" classical music was good at the beginning of a
session, and that concertos were really effective in the deepening
and integrative periods of the drug action. Concertos seemed to
express and enhance the relationship of the individual to the
environment as expressed by the interaction of the soloist with
the orchestra. Piano concertos were particularly good, especially
Chopin's First and Second, and Beethoven's Fourth and Fifth.
Sessions lasted from four to eight hours. I was with the
subject the whole time while Sid joined us periodically and always
for the simple sandwich lunch, eaten there so that the subjects
didn't have to leave the room. The presence of both a man and a
woman seemed to help resolve problems, especially during stressful
times. We also used other aids such as photographs, especially of
family and early life situations, and a large, hand-held mirror.
After the sessions the subjects were taken to the art therapy
clinic to draw or paint, as they chose. Their productions make a
fascinating record of the course of their therapy. Even later,
when I was in private practice, photographs of the patient and
family members were found to be especially helpful in resolving
early problems. While there was no art clinic at that time,
pastels and paints were made available, and many patients chose to
draw or paint following a session.
Of the 22 subjects in the study carried out at the Brentwood
V.A., five subjects were neuropsychiatric hospital patients and 17
were volunteer outpatients. Problems ranged from depressive
states to borderline schizophrenic patients in the hospital. Our
improved rate was just over 72%, as judged by the two doctors, the
patient, and the individual closest to the patient. Follow-up
interviews were held over periods ranging from six to 17 months,
continuing success in behavioral adaptation being the criteria of
improvement. For instance, one of the "non-improved" category, a
hospital patient, was cured of his alcoholism, the reason for his
admission, only to become a compulsive gambler two years later.
The rate of improvement was 16 out of 22 patients. (Eisner, B.G.
and Cohen, S., Psychotherapy with Lysergic Acid Diethyllamide, J.
Nerv. and Ment. Dis., Vol: 127, #6, December 1958)
Probably our most dramatic patient was an alcoholic who had
been hospitalized 23 times for bouts of drunkenness during which
he usually became violent. J.D. had seven LSD sessions with
discussions in between when he requested them. He improved to the
point of being discharged from the hospital and has never been
rehospitalized -- some 35 years later (although, he did drink
again). His weekly productions in the art clinic are a
fascinating record of the drama of his recovery, although they do
not picture the event which made his recovery possible: the
abreaction of an incident where he had been captured by the
Germans in World War II and had had to kill two Germans in order
to escape and return through enemy lines to his own Air Force
unit.
Another interesting case was a hospitalized patient who was
obviously on the verge of a psychotic episode.
"I'm afraid we'll blow him into a paranoid schizophrenic
psychosis with LSD," I told the ward doctor.
"Well, he's going to have a paranoid breakdown anyway if we
don't do something," the doctor replied, "and there's nothing lost
if we try."
So with Sid's approval, we gave the patient a series of LSD
sessions of gradually increasing dosage and walked him past his
psychosis so that he was able to be discharged the following
month. Again, we have a record of his progress in the pastel
drawings he did each week.
With respect to approval, Sid and I had decided that no
subject would be approved for the study unless interviewed by both
of us, and we agreed that the person was appropriate for the
study. The agreement was breached twice: once when we accepted a
patient by phone without having interviewed him; and Sid's solo
approval of a patient who later, after I had gone into private
practice, broke into my office back door and knocked me out of my
chair from behind. This was a schizoid patient who was almost
impossible to tolerate until he was under LSD, and then he could
be related to. He had been unable to get a job or to maintain a
relationship, but after 16 LSD sessions, he was able to do both.
However, evidently we didn't drain the reservoir of his hostility
enough during his sessions. Incidentally, it was interesting to
note how LSD lowered an individual's barriers enough to make the
person possible to relate to. No matter how unpleasant or hostile
before, all patients were "lovable" once the LSD was working
strongly.
It was a fascinating and absorbing time during that first
study of LSD. Sid and I were very involved with the psyches and
complications of our subjects/patients, our colleagues, and almost
anyone who had had LSD or was working with it. Certainly our
study proved to both of us beyond the shadow of a doubt that LSD
was one of the most potent therapeutic tools in existence. Also
that it was a powerful drug for teaching: observers could watch
as patients went through levels of their defensive system, layer
by layer, down to core problems. It was amazing how observers
could follow, see, and understand the structure and the process.
We also learned about the power and the process of abreaction of
past traumatic events as we watched and recorded successful
solutions of difficulties emerge from the recapitulation of past-
time events, accompanied by emotional turmoil and often explosive
actions and vocalizations.
Usually the insight(s) came to the person himself or herself.
However, with difficult problems, sometimes insights and
interpretations from one or both of the "therapists" could resolve
the difficulty. But the main technique which was found effective
for basic problems which presented themselves in symbolic terms --
such as raging fires, the void, dragons, a vortex -- was to
instruct the individual to move toward whatever appeared.
On consideration, this is an extremely valuable piece of
advice for anyone with a difficult problem: to face the
difficulty head on, and to move toward it. In the first place, if
we run from a problem, we can't see just what it consists of, how
threatening it is, whether it is going to devour us, or what.
When facing away and running, the problem always feels insoluble,
and the terror increases as we retreat, being all the more
terrifying because it is unknown. When we turn to face the
problem, we become aware of its nature and are able to deal with
whatever it is in the best possible manner. Furthermore, and most
important, as the individual under LSD "walked" toward the fire in
order to be consumed, the flames which appeared to be of hellish
intensity, suddenly changed in the moment of impact, of stepping
into their midst, and were transformed, as though miraculously,
into a situation capable of resolution.
As Sid and I finished our absorbing study, we began to write
up the experience. Also, we collected everything we could find
which had been written about LSD, especially anything which had
any bearing on therapeutic changes in subjects or patients. And
we read and reread the reports of our subjects/patients, the
necessity for a written report of each session having been one of
the requirements for the subject's participation.
About this time, Dr. Herman C.B. Denber of Manhattan State
Hospital suggested us as participants in the upcoming meeting in
Rome on September 13, 1958 of the First International Conference
on Neuro-psycho-pharmacology. That was a pretty heady business
for me -- the prospect of a trip to Rome, and to give a paper at
an international conference! There was a paper to be written, but
that wasn't all. In getting to Rome there was the possibility of
visiting all of the LSD workers in Europe!
But before Rome and the exciting business of getting there on
the way to the meeting, it seems a good idea and might be
interesting to review some of the correspondence from those
exciting first days of trying to understand LSD.
June 25, 1957
Dear Dr. Osmond:
"I have been contemplating this letter with pleasure for
weeks; I'm glad that it is finally becoming actual."
"In the first place, I didn't think it was fair for me to get
so much pleasure out of your letters to Sid and Gerald (which they
have kindly let me share) without telling you about it. Sort of
like watching the neighbors without their being aware of it..."
"We have been doing such fascinating work, too, that I want
to tell you about it...As you know, Sid and I became interested in
the therapeutic possibilities of LSD through you, Gerald, Al, etc.
We read every report we could get out hands on... We even tried a
few patients ourselves, and got good results. The big question
was whether we could make it work in every case; and make it work
without throwing that percentage of people who seem prone to
unpleasant reactions into a tailspin. We think we have both of
these factors licked by a simple device: we start the subject at
25 gamma and increase the dosage each week..."
"Sometime I'd like to tell you about the process of our
therapy; about the mystic or interactive experience which I
believe is at the core of any therapeutic change which is lasting,
and talk to (you) about so many things which bear on this area --
like hypnosis, for instance. And depersonalization..."
"I have noticed that the course of the drug seems somewhat
the same from subject to subject if there is no interference from
the therapist. I think the function of the therapist is to
optimize conditions for the LSD to work... In tracking down the
records of subjects with bad experiences and in talking to them, I
have found that they were holding out and fighting with all their
might against accepting some aspect of themselves -- and letting
go to the drug. And they fight by regressive modes of defense:
catatonia, paranoia, depression, etc."
(long discussion of schizophrenia and Humphry Osmond's theory)
"...If only I could talk to you about this -- Sid and I really
have at it, but how we would love to have you here, too...please
give my best to Dr. Hoffer. I liked him immensely when I met him
-- just like with you. And now -- Best regards from us all --
Betty"
Box 1056 Weyburn 30:6:57
Dear Betty
"(I hope you will forgive the familiarity but if in doubt
look on it as a bit of cuneiform or cryptography). I was
delighted to hear from you. I enclose a copy of the key to the
short hand to help your ciphering; you might let Gerald and Sid
squint at it when in doubt...I am very much interested and
encouraged at your account of the work you are doing. It seems to
me much more sophisticated than Abramson and Sandison (in
England). Paul Bergman (of the Pinel Clinic in Seattle --
possibly you might like to write to him) has suggested
psychoanalytically that this mass "integration" of id, ego, and
super-ego seems to take place -- Your idea of starting with a
small dose, working up is very sensible. I suspect that it
reduces the anxiety giving a patient a sense of mastery and
achievement which makes the experience very much "his own show"...I
am much in agreement with your views on the need to allow the
process to unfold and developing its own way. It may become
possible to intervene when we know more, but possibly when we know
more we shall be less keen to muddy the waters. How should we
interpret the psychotic-like effects? I am not altogether sure
that they are really all of one sort..."
"Your model of schizophrenia is a convincing one and very
congenial to me... (long and fascinating discussion of
schizophrenia; he really seems to understand the aspects from the
biological, psychological, perceptual, etc)..."
"It will be very interesting to see how LSD works with early
and borderline schizophrenics. It may well be that a discovery on
their part of the `naturalness' of their strange experiences may
well make it easier to cope with it. And what may be as important
may make communication possible because of the recognition that if
the therapist has taken LSD too there is then a common language as
it were. I believe this opening up of communication between the
ill person and the therapist who has become an honorary psychotic
may play a large part..."
"I have not seen Al yet, but hope to do so. Abram Hoffer saw
him last week and he seems more settled. I think we may slowly
get him to realize that the professional and business worlds
differ in their customs and that piracy still does not very often
pay steady dividends even though it may be a good short term
investment. He does not understand the patient and prolonged work
necessary to turn a hunch, however good, in (to) a working
hypothesis. Yet I believe he has been very helpful in churning up
good ideas and could be even more useful in the future if he can
learn that we live in very different worlds... However in the past
explorers have not always been the most scientific, excellent or
wholly detached people. They have often been quite wrong in their
estimates of the country into which they pushed. Christopher
Columbus believing that he was in the Indies...(Al) is much more
likely to receive recognition for his considerable achievements
than poor Columbus was. Ever, Humphry"
July 11, 1957
"Dear Humphrey: (and I would have done it last time if I'd had the
nerve)..."
(long discussion about communication, schizophrenia, adrenochrome,
perceptual anomalies, etc)
"And may I venture an aside here and agree with you wholly
and completely that love is the transcendental (how did you put it
-- transdimensional?) vector by which any salvaging (or
salvation?) can occur. But it takes great time and enormous
energy for the channel through which it comes and cannot be
maintained indefinitely, I believe...Love is somehow the bridge by
which the sick person finds his way back..."
"I think I mentioned that there was a schizophrenic whom I
wanted to give LSD to...the three borderline ones we have worked
with have given us enormous insight -- and a healthy respect for
the amount of after-hours work when the subject is a `normal' or
outpatient referral. We hope in the fall to concentrate fully on
hospital patients whereby the individual will be transferred to
Sid's ward and we can really see what is going on and be assured
that there is good care 24 hours a day..."
"I wrote Al just yesterday and took the liberty of mentioning
that you had called him an explorer like Christopher Columbus... I
hope you don't mind my quoting from you to give grandeur to my
suggestion of where he can contribute the most. I think that you
and I are the only two who see both sides of Al and are able to
deal with them simultaneously; he does stir up such a fury of
reactions at either one extreme or another. And then perhaps I am
calmer about him because he has been most helpful and kind to me,
really..."
"So with great good wishes for your trip to Zurich and many
thanks for making such a pleasure my attempt to communicate. And
with love from us all, Betty"
Box 1056, Weyburn, 21/7/57
Dear Betty,
"...delay in answering...a project which I have put to have
Francis Huxley (Julian's son) work 6 - 9 months on a very chronic
ward and look at it as he would the Urubu...who are an Amazonian
excannibal tribe. Huxley would live on the ward and would confer
with Kyo Isumi our architect to enlarge the architect's idea of
people and space. From this we hope to enlarge our thinking on
this topic and maybe make minor changes using Hediger's (Zurich
Zoo) principles and see where we can make better social conditions
at minimal expense...Our objective is to take the running of mental
hospitals out of the sphere of intuition and put it slap into
learned techniques. There are far too few intuitive people for us
to depend on them..."
"Of course you must develop a new lingo for the LSD work --
you don't want it confused and contaminated. I suspect however
that some of the existentialist or phenomenologists work might be
useful...I don't think you can or indeed should pretend that those
who have not taken LSD 25 or something similar can possibly
understand. I don't think they should be allowed to use it as a
therapy and they should be most strongly discouraged -- Hard
words, but what is the point -- they will just use words about
words and we have so many of them already..."
"I am sure that you are right LSD 25 properly used by those
who are prepared gives immense self understanding. But as the
mystics insist, this is never absolute or permanent, but then in
life nothing is. It has to be used and good habits built on the
new foundation..."
"I am very glad you did write Al and mention C.C. as a
parallel...I know him well and love him, but whether I can influence
him to see things as they are I don't know. Possibly he has no
motive for seeing things as they are. It is much easier to feel
that `I am right' and the island, the aeroplane and the Rolls
Royce are mute and not inglorious evidences that not I, but the
other fellow is wrong. However Abram and I hope to see him soon.
He wants to contribute, he is able to, he has a variety of gifts..."
"Good wishes to Sidney, Gerald, and all. Ever, Humphry"
August 3, 1957
Dear Humphrey:
"I do hope that you have a chance to see Jung in Zurich. He
lives in a suburb called Kusnacht -- on Seestrasse 228... I was
moved to drop him a note telling him of my admiration of his
intuitions regarding the impersonal or racial unconscious and
intimating at levels beyond. That and individuation appear to me
to be well substantiated by the LSD work we've been doing and by
the many reports of subjects which have passed through my hands...in
the years to come I think that his contribution will be more
recognized and he will stand with Freud rather than being
mentioned almost apologetically by categorizers as though he
belonged in a footnote..."
"It was interesting to have your report on the two
psychologists who got into the paranoid area and kept at it hour
after hour. This `schizophrenic belt' (Al's term, as I remember)
is one of the aspects of LSD and it is of immense fascination to
speculate on just why and when its doors open to engulf the
intoxicant. I went into it and came out by myself, but had to be
pulled back from the area by interpretations by Sid and my friend;
we have had one patient go into it in the form of severe
depression; and one just the other day who happens to be a good
friend of mine went through it to the experience of relatedness to
humanity. Again it was interpretations of what she was worried
about which brought her out -- that and the physical contact with
Sid and me. This latter appears to be of extreme importance...
she needed both a man and woman present to pull her out quickly.
The trip through that to the other proved the most beneficial
experience she has had therapeutically so far; I look to her next
(and last, I think) session for the furtherest advance which I
think will be preceded by her depersonalization. Because it seems
that the extreme mystic benefits to be obtained from LSD are
available only after some form of depersonalization is experienced
by the subject. The razor's edge in a way: on the one side one
tumbles down the precipice to psychosis if the shock of `not being
one's self' is too great; on the other (side) one is projected
upward to another level of consciousness and understanding. Do I
make too much importance of this as the unlocking phenomenon for
the mystic area? Please check my observations on this."
"Of course the `cure' isn't permanent. But at least one can
see where the sun rises and sets and the horizons and the galaxies
and know the infinite peace of liberation. And since the air is
purified by truth, it gains something for use in everyday living.
And one can never be content to live always in the valley at sea
level when one has experienced the rarefied ozone of the higher
altitude. So it serves as a map left in the intellect, as a
warmth or remembered radiance in the emotions, and as a still
small voice or an agonizing goad in the conscience and a longing
in the heart. I really mixed up levels of abstraction in that one
didn't I? I think I mean to say that one can never be the same
after going through self understanding (of the outstanding
problems of the moment) to the experience of the Other under LSD.
At first I felt reluctant to exercise the responsibility I felt
was in my hands at setting another individual's feet into the path
which must inevitably become straighter and narrower as the
perception clears. But if the individual is sent to us, who am I
to send him away?..."
(Description and discussion of three borderline cases, and of
paranoid schizophrenics)
"Now my observations may not be wide enough, but it seems to
me that temperament may set the direction -- certainly the
biochemical is the substrate -- but the early environment showed
the direction in which the twig was bent. A willow may lean
further and bend back on itself in spirals, but an oak will have
only a slight curvature. Actually, I think Freud was extremely
perceptive and accurate on many things. I think there is a good
deal more to the levels of psychosexual development than the
opponents of psychoanalysis would like to admit (and a great deal
less than the devoted brethren would like to think, too). I feel
that early experiences plus temperament give the form and design
of the ego structure. Heavens -- end of page; so end of letter.
With great good luck and fun in Zurich and best love - Betty"
August 11, 1957
Dear Humphrey:
"This is in the way of addenda to my letter of the 3rd. We
have just done two extraordinary women subjects with LSD,
increasing doses, and the steps they went through were so
startlingly similar -- with variations for their own individual
dynamics, of course -- that it seemed perhaps there was a rough
sort of map here for our inspection."
"With the 25 gamma both women relived incidents from their
past -- and both of them spoke of it in terms of the unrolling of
microfilm. Both are extremely intelligent people, and the details
remembered from half a century ago, even, were extraordinary. The
microfilm story unrolled -- not in the sequence or steadily, but
jumping from recent past to deep past, but concentrating more as
time went on, on the deepest past. And there were many tears and
laughs accompanying it. This continued until in both cases
repressed incidents were relived with strong affect -- what I call
a massive abreaction. In both cases these early incidents had
served as a crystallization point for later emotional
distortions."
"Once they were remembered and relived, there came a
peacefulness; then the scene appeared to change to a different
level of consciousness -- the symbolic. Both women experienced
extremely frightening `apparitions' which appeared to be symbolic
representations of their own guilt. The younger woman went into
the schizophrenic area; the older one experienced it more like
hell with Mephistopheles present..."
"Getting through this aspect of the unconscious entailed
moving toward the difficulty and the help of both Sid and me. In
both cases they needed both a man and a woman, and the time
element ran about 45 minutes...And part of the most effective help
is through the `laying on of hands'. That, encouragement, and the
aid in moving toward the frightening apparition rather than away
from it. Then it changes its face and reveals itself. Another
help is the letting the frightening animal or incident fall away
and recede into perspective, which comes with the help of the
therapist."
"Once through this level, comes the experience of the
solution of the problem through the ages: one subject experienced
the full family circle first in Biblical times, then Egyptian,
then Grecian. Both started with the Biblical level and then
experienced peace, the unity of humanity, and the solution of the
outstanding problem in different ages. This has been true of a
number of reports I have read of sessions that Al has conducted.
I suspect that this is the area of the impersonal unconscious
wherein one experiences other times and the personal problems are
solved at a different level."
"After this, the rising to the light -- and the going as high
as the person is able to. But the oneness of humanity precedes
this -- and seems to stem directly from the impersonal level.
Perhaps that is the level of human unity; the cosmic one arises
from that."
"When people jump past one of the levels, could it be
possible that they either have worked through that one, or are in
some way open to the other one at this time? Some for instance go
straight to the ages; some straight to the light...I think maybe
with time our understanding of the layers of the unconscious will
be clearer... With best love... Betty"
Box 1056, Weyburn 10:8:57
Dear Betty,
"Yours of the third August to hand -- and being in the mood
and having just had Al here for a couple of days, I feel I must
hurry and answer before the pre-Zurich rush clamps down..."
"We had a delightful visit. I think I have unraveled much of
the California debacle and it was in some ways highly successful;
because even if Al did not do all he hoped at least he seems to
have added a good push to your work and helped it along...He brought
his old fireman's hat along and I must admit that he has no false
ideas about it. It is a Ph.D. It is recognized by the state of
Tennessee (it has their seal on it). Al seems to recognize quite
clearly that it is not quite the same as some Ph.D.'s but it is
recognized by state and so with limitations by federal law. And
hell, Al is better than 100 Ph.D.s or M.D.s, much shrewder, too!
His lawyers have examined it carefully and tell him that he is
entitled to call himself Dr. H. if he wishes. However now he
seems happy enough to be Captain! I am curious to know what
happened. But it does seem that K. Ditman was ill advised to hold
up Al's LSM. It was an arbitrary, improper, and probably illegal
act. It was above all the one sort of action which would set Al
moving along his tycoon lines... What Al did not quite recognize
was that in his new surroundings such behavior was a trifle outre.
Yet looking at it from his point of view it was wholly commendable
and really very moderate. So I suppose Wild W. Hickock would have
been commendably moderate if he had shot off someone's hat rather
than his head...Al signaled quite clearly that he would get his
property back and this meant that he would act in accordance with
common business procedure. I don't think that anyone heeded his
signals... Anyway, he is very happy getting news of your work and
of course I am too..."
"I think you are perfectly correct (and the mystics bear you
out on this) that there is a psychotic belt lying between
normality and what my colleagues Duncan Blewitt (one of the two
bedeviled psychologists) calls the golden strand. Physical
contact may be very important..."
"I do hope to see the great old master of Zurich. He has
written too much, but he is so exuberant and seems to have no
critical friend who can hack off some of the pudding. Indeed
rather the reverse. The faithful are inclined to encourage him to
great diffuse tomes! I had a notable three hours with him almost
two years ago, but I fear that I won't be so lucky this time.
Jung is greatly pleased at our work on toxin X whose existence he
predicted about 50 years ago in spite of Freud's opposition..."
"My good wishes to Sid -- and of course to Gerald, Margaret,
Will and Michael when you see them. Let me know if my hunch is
right about the Ditman episode. I'm pretty sure what you saw was
another convention being played. It looked like nursery, but it
is orthodox business. Ever Humphry"
Box 1056, Weyburn. 15:7:(should be 8):57
My dear Betty,
"Now you have got something. That clicks..."
I think that we must realize that not only are there specific
difficulties at each level, but there is a very real possibility
of a scrambling of levels -- being in two places at the same time.
We experience this in a mild way with the cinema and television
now, but we have very quickly learnt how to cope...Now what
determines our capacity for changing levels and being able to
accept "other realities"? There are clearly two great dangers
which have to be guarded against: 1. the incapacity to accept
another reality other than the culturally sanctified one, i.e.,
one learns society's way so well or so painfully that one either
dare not or can not look elsewhere...2. The incapacity to have a
relatively stable `here and now', so that the other levels become
here and now and can swamp here and now. What has to be done is
to steer a course between these two and it is not and can not be
easy. The administrator has usually fallen into error l., the
artist or saint into error 2..."
"There must, surely, be a variety of hells depending upon the
levels involved. I suspect that one level is very simply the non
expression of the cosmic in one who has once experienced it. Hell
can be here and now, in the personal subconscious, in the
impersonal symbolic, and in impersonal humanity ages. I don't
believe that it is in the cosmic because it is essentially only
the absence of the cosmic. Does that sound right?"
"The great virtue of impersonal (humanity-ages) is that it
gives one perspective. We are not alone, we can not be alone.
There is no personal tragedy, the only personal tragedy is the
result of confining oneself and one's experience to the levels of
personality at which we normally function -- I wholly agree.
First we must discover that no man or woman is an island, but we
are parts of the main. After this it is possible for us to begin
to appreciate those levels which you label cosmic. To me this
does not mean that we have reached THE ABSOLUTE, as some would
have it, but as Raynor Johnson wisely suggests, we have reached
the limit of our perceiving and communicating apparatus. In other
words our 3-4 dimensional brain has limitations beyond which it
can not go. This does not, I am sure, apply to our souls, but
however as far as we in our here and now are concerned it is
important because it sets a limit on our experience. The limit is
so vast and generous as to be no limitation, but it has some
important practical applications. The best that we can know of
God is the most that can be revealed in our 3-4 dimensional
continuum -- beyond that we can not and will not be able to go.
However by understanding our limitations we can be splendidly
free. We do not need to heed those who peddle distorted visions
of God, they have partly sprung from subconscious levels and
though they may be useful and even necessary at certain times as
guide posts -- only an idiot mistakes the guide post for his final
destination. -- I suspect that therapy which will emerge will aim
at first allowing the person to orient himself and find out where
he is vis-a-vis the various levels; second to explore them with a
greater or lesser freedom; and lastly to learn how to relate the
cosmic levels through the others to the here and now, and to live
so that all are attuned. Enough to do? ..."
"I was greatly pleased to have your news and look forward to
further news... Good wishes to Sid and Gerald when you see him.
It looks as if we are soon going to be ready for a good push on
all fronts and push back our ignorance some distance. Ever
Humphry (on with the last bit of the budget)"
September 8, 1957
Dear Humphrey:
"So much has happened in the past few weeks that I doubt that
I shall be able to communicate it properly..."
"I think I wrote you that I was going to conduct -- by the
way, I hope that you are comfortable because I have a feeling that
this is going to run on tonight -- so get some good stout ale at
your elbow or a pot of delicious English tea. I figure it must be
the water because I never had any like that in England. Anyway, I
had a psychotherapy seminar with some of the Sequoia Seminar
people -- ten of their leadership group, in fact. I did one last
year as a trial and there seemed to be great possibilities...I had
long wanted to try some experimentation with group therapy, and
this seemed to be my chance...There has been a gradual movement of
the group away from the strict consideration of the teachings of
Jesus to a combined study of the best method of living life...and
self study. Because through the years it became apparent that one
might decide to live the good life, but there was some little
nuisance inside who didn't get the word and really raised havoc
when the chips were down in important decisions..."
"Last summer I had tentatively planned with one of the
members of the seminar who is an art teacher that we would combine
art and therapy. There has always been music at the seminar...So we
have a situation with many factors: a group of ten people deeply
interested (and committed) to living the best life they know of
and at the same time dedicated to finding out about whatever
elements of themselves prevent this; a gorgeous natural setting --
redwoods, beautiful country in the Santa Cruz mountains and no
household chores or interruptions from mundane affairs; the
combination of therapy, art, and music. And I added another
variable: a drug. Sid had had some mescaline (20 milligrams),
dexedrine (10 milligrams) capsules made up for our use at the
hospital...I had noticed in sessions where he (Al) used the pills
(methedrine) that there was more openness, and that I, for one,
was able to "go along" with the person getting LSD much more
easily. So we had enough pills to try them out with half a
capsule to start to see that there weren't any ill effects, and
two full capsules for two different days. (All covered by medical
Rx.)"
"I couldn't believe what happened. We started out with a
schedule of two hours of really concentrated therapy (at which
time I did much more interpretation at a deep level than is common
in group therapy situations), then went down to the art and they
could paint or use pastels on wet paper or mold clay. There was
no talking at all -- and music part of the time. After lunch two
more hours of therapy, and then art again if they wanted (on the
days they had the pills we ran all morning in session (8:30 to 12)
and afternoons l:15 to 6 and had to make up the art the next day.
Truly, Humphrey, on the second day when one of the group started
into the psychotic belt, I was surprised, and then when the group
began painting series of pictures from their unconscious...which
showed their basic family identifications, the state of the
problem as far as the unconscious, the working out of problems in
a series of paintings, and the projection of the solution in the
future (all these are not necessarily connected -- nor separate) I
was overwhelmed. And then another member really went into the
schizophrenic level. We saw it begin (thank god for LSD so I knew
what was happening and could steer it), we helped him go down, and
then when he was there with the ego completely shattered and
feeling alone, abandoned, and insane, we all went and put our
hands on him and within a few minutes he had come up with great
rapidity into the light, and was a completely changed person due
to the reintegration following the shattering -- reintegration on
a new level. There was one further journey into the psychotic --
and these three trips demonstrated to me LSD mechanics in slow
motion -- that and what happens afterwards because several people
were having extra-terrestrial, if I may use the word, experiences
with the combinations of therapy, art, and drug."
"I was deeply in awe during the whole week... The days that
we took the pills the group oneness was palpable; otherwise,
without the support of all, some of them couldn't have gone where
they did and effected the work they managed. The great boon of
the week for my work was that it showed me in slow motion what it
is that projects people into the psychotic. You know, not
everyone has to go there. And it also demonstrated to me about
the importance of something I can only call commitment. This is
relative to your question of changing levels and what makes it
possible..."
"Briefly, what appears to project an individual into
`insanity' is the cracking (for whatever reason) of his picture of
himself -- the disintegration of his ego, I suppose it might be
called. I have a certain idea of myself, and when that is
destroyed -- or when the cornerstone (the whole thing need not be
shattered) is pulled down, then I am suddenly left adrift -- not
knowing who I am, where I am or what is reality. One of the most
touchy areas is that of basic identification: masculine vs.
feminine -- (and I have a new one I observed -- neuter). They are
the ones who are really in trouble because there has been so much
threat from both the masculine and the feminine in their early
learning situation that they have had to make themselves neuter
and then it becomes of prime necessity to protect the self from
the knowledge of this dastardly fact by acting out strongly in the
direction of the desired identification. Another area that is
explosive is one's basic goodness. And the area which can hit the
insanity button every time is the recognition that one is
unlovable. (I am so terrible no one -- not even God can love me).
Now it is interesting to observe that not everyone seems to have
to deal with the disintegration of the ego on the insane level.
This probably has something to do with biochemical levels, but
somehow I have a hunch it is more basically related to the
temperament and defensive system of the individual involved.
Those who must most strongly defend on the intellectual,
controlled, rational level (against the other parts of themselves
-- really against their own unconscious) seem to be the ones who
are most likely to hit the skids in this direction. In examining
myself, for I was an insanity belt girl, it seems to me that it
was in some way related to fear -- fear of unreality, or the
unconscious -- of not being, etc. I mean when it is definitely
experienced as insanity and not as symbolic hell or purgation.
This latter gem comes to everyone some time, it appears to me..."
"Now -- the commitment. All the members of the seminar are
extremely committed to the best possible way of life -- no matter
what the cost. That is, intellectually. Of course the
unconscious commitment may lie at any number of different levels;
rather, one may reserve one or a thousand things from the abyss
while thinking intellectually one is willing to dispense with all.
And it appeared from my observation of the group that individuals
are able to enter into their own unconsciousness to the extent to
which they are basically committed -- that is once they have
survived or been led through the insanity or symbolic purgation
belt..."
"You must help me out on this commitment business. That is
not a good word because it is probably too religious. There
should be something about willingness to pay the cost in order to
know the truth...I do know for sure now that dosage has to do a lot
with the level available, up to a certain point: 25 gamma for
personal unconscious, and sometimes 50 gamma, too; 75 gamma up to
the impersonal and symbolic up to the cosmic depending on the
state of the individual at the moment."
"And here I must digress a moment. I almost wrote you
another letter before the seminar to tell you that the levels were
interpenetrating. And then you talked about that in your letter
to me... I discovered that before the really traumatic repressed
memory (personal unconscious) could be released and abreacted, the
subject had to live through some symbolic purgation. One of the
two also had to go through the insanity business..."
"And here I come to the question of guilt. I certainly had a
lesson about my much too easy statement about perhaps hell being
personal guilt or whatever it was I said in one of my last
letters. This is true -- yes, in some limited form in the
personal unconscious. But how right you are and how
extraordinarily insightful (or is it personal experience, too!)
for you to note that each level has its own symbolic hell or
purgation. I was taught this lesson -- and well, just about ten
days ago."
"For you see, Humphrey, when I got home from the seminar I
took 75 gamma of LSD. (session with Tom Powers, which is
discussed)...I felt that I had understood the third of the
borderline schizophrenics I told you about and why it was that
none of us could tell what was operating. I felt, Humphrey -- and
you may well think that I misread my experience and I may well
have -- I felt as though I were experiencing purgation for events
and circumstances which were not "mine" -- that is related to this
present here and now of mine...I did feel as though I were accepting
things for others or that I was accepting the responsibility or
the results or the penalties for actions of my own in another
lifetime..."
"And oh, Humphrey, of course you are right. The only hell is
the absence of the cosmic; the clearer one sees the sharper the
pain. On the other hand the light descends into the simple things
to help us finish whatever it is that we have yet to unravel...It is
a cheerful, soaring burden when one is close to the love, but so
many things can obscure it and the mist creeps in so subtly along
with the darknesses..."
"I shall run over the questions in your letters and not do
any of them due justice, for which please forgive me. But the
hour dawns...I was interested in your feeling that one can exist on
several levels simultaneously; I think I understand but you may
have some nuances of which I am unaware. Certainly with LSD one
exists on multitudinous levels at once; the great boon is that one
sees it from so many levels. The point really is that they are
all aligned -- and then we can transcend them. But of course the
point of transcendence is in the time-space of the instant here
and now; that is of ultimate importance on the one hand and yet is
as smoke and clouds on the other. But unless it works here,
nothing has been effected...(As to Sheldon... I did write to Jung,
since we had met him, and I had an interesting letter back which
was rather strongly anti-drug...As to Al...)"
"Do have a wonderful vacation, most successful paper, and all
love Betty"
Box 1056, Weyburn 22:10:57 Letter all about Al
Saturday night, November 16, 1957
Dear Humphry: (I have been endowing you with an extra "e";
pardon)...
"First, many thanks for all of the articles; I enjoyed each
immensely and was awed anew at your scope and breadth. I was so
happy to have the Academy reprint; it is one of the finest
articles of its kind I have ever seen. Thank you. And the grand
strategy for Mental Hospitals I found intensely interesting. I
was particularly struck by your pointing out of the devilish pair,
degradation and disacculturation, which haunt the long corridors
of our present institutions..."
"I could have given you a huge hug when I read `LSD is an
instrument... as an instrument it is neutral'. I should like to
see this in neon letters over every office which engages in
research with LSD. And, incidentally, we tried some acetyl
lysergic acid a couple of weeks ago. It was 500 gamma, one
ampule, and Sid had the information that it should act just about
as 100 gamma of LSD. We gave it to a subject, an inadequate
schizoid character whom we have been bringing along for some 14
treatments. It blew him right through the sound barrier, but was
so strong and projected him through so fast that he was confused a
great deal of the time and the clarity and space for therapeutic
manipulation were lacking..."
"And before I go into the past existence bit, let me
communicate a small bit of information which I picked up in
Savage's 1952 article in the Amer. J. of Psychiat. #108: page
899). He reports that he had two diabetics who had to return to
medical service before their LSD treatments were completed.
`Curiously, their insulin requirement was lowered temporarily
after taking LSD.' I thought this might be a little piece which
would fit into that gigantic jigsaw puzzle of yours..."
"It is of sad interest that we have so far confused ourselves
with the `rational' and the `materialistic' approach since the
`renaissance' that we have progressively banged steel doors shut
between layers of our mind. So much so that the more intelligent
and the more scientific a man, the more likely that he must become
mad before he can become himself."
"I had an interesting session on Thursday. I had been up
late the night before and so had taken a 15 mg. dexedrine spansule
at breakfast. This potentiates empathy, I have noted, but this
time, it really was as though I had taken LSD. I had a continuing
series of visions (always within the framework of the defenses --
only one break through into the cosmic level and nothing into the
humanity-ages). But the interesting thing about this was that it
was not my symbolism; it was the subject's. We were startled at
the similarity all through the day -- it appeared to run
concurrently. And one time I had a real anxiety attack on a
subject which I have really cleared up because his problem hit a
hook in me on the periphery of the problem...I thought you would be
interested in this intensification of direct transmission from one
unconscious to another. My observation of this in the past, which
was corroborated on Thursday, is that his visions or symbolism are
received by me, and in the straining through my perceptual
apparatus become distorted with aspects peculiar to me. But to
the best of my knowledge what I was receiving on Thursday was from
him and not from my dynamics..."
"Another question I should like to ask -- an unimportant one,
but one which has puzzled me and which you might have a clue on.
Do you have any idea what is operating when the reality of other
levels of consciousness or of the defenses is seen upside down or
on its side? This has happened to me several times, and usually
when I am receiving someone else's symbols...it has also happened
with hypnogogic images a couple of times just before sleep..."
"I must confess that I was startled by your suggestion of the
possibility of the neuter being an expression of consciousness
before sexual bifurcation. My intuitive feeling was to reject
this, and I still do not feel it is companionable, but I shall try
to keep an open mind on the subject and see what occurs. It makes
much better sense to me to posit an exact balance of ambivalences
at the two poles: the male and female having exactly equal pulls
toward identification..."
"With all good wishes from both Will and me -- Sid you have
heard from directly and I presume that is true also of Gerald.
And with myriads of congratulations on the APA silver plaque, the
triumphal tour, and most of all on the return home and the
resumption of the exciting voyages into the stratosphere. Love,
Betty"
January 25, 1958
Dear Humphry:
"What good and wonderful news that you will be down sometime
in February, probably the latter part..."
"I have missed hearing from you. I presume the Thanksgiving-
Christmas axis descended as heavily on Weyburn as it did on
Brentwood; anyway, I am just beginning to work my way out. I have
just completed the third draft of an article describing our study.
Sid is working on it this weekend..."
"The study has gone well this year; I hate to see it end.
Sid feels that we have completed our research and didn't ask the
donor for more money, although I feel that for it to be completely
finished we should examine the parameters of schizophrenia under
the drug. I am doing the first one now -- schizophrenic of two
years' duration who came into the hospital suicidal. Three
treatments to date: 50, 75-25, and one ampule of ALD. He does
magnificently under the drug, but the residual gain is small,
although he was taken off suicide status after the second
treatment. But he has a very immature streak -- what I call the
`spoiled brat' syndrome, and he just doesn't want to work hard
enough to change himself to get well."
"This business of the spoiled brat, I should like to discuss
it sometime. It is actually one of the hardest of the therapeutic
tasks I have been called on to tackle..."
"(So many questions to discuss) And also on our Current
Thinking. Incidentally, you will be interested to know, I think,
that Sid gave it to Carl Henze who showed it to Dr. Abramson. He
was quite interested; in fact he made a tape with one of his
assistants, which Dr. Henze transcribed for us. He was very
puzzled by the religious implications of the work, which is only
natural since he works with low doses in the psychoanalytic
setting. But he is open enough to be interestedly questioning and
seemingly eager to find out what we are saying... What a frame of
reference will do! I wrote Abramson back, trying to make semantic
bridges with his `ego enhancement' and our `integrative
experience'. I hope that it works. Somehow, Humphry, I want very
much to help bring the integrative experience back into
psychiatry; to put that wedge into the door so that the
unconscious can flow through and science can take a look at how
constrictive the present psychiatric concepts have become; and how
lop-sided."
"I think that is why I am sad that our research is coming to
an end, too. Because to me the ideal research setting into the
unconscious appears to be LSD therapy under progressively
increasing dosage. It seems to bring out such an orderly progress
of events and the process comes so clear...a mystic needs the hard-
boiled realist to make him convert hunches to data. Sid is an
excellent foil but I think that the material we have been getting
makes him uncomfortable. In fact he has said as much. He is for
controlled experiments rather than empirical ones and he feels
that what I am contaminates the LSD research. And of course he is
right, in a way and on one level...it is my feeling that it takes a
mystic-therapist to get consistent data on the other and cosmic
levels of the unconscious; the analytic frame of reference used as
a base of therapy stops the individual at the symbolic level and
only the Jungians such as Sandison get into archetypal material,
which is only the second level, it seems to me. Incidentally, I
was strongly moved to write to Dr. Sandison, and have just
completed a letter to him enclosing our Current Thinking..."
"Herman Denber was out for the WPA in November, and you would
like him, Humphry. He is almost as nice as you are. Poor man, he
is being dragged into the mystic by the seat of his pants, and he
finds part of it hard going. However he is wonderful about it and
admits the data although he is reluctant to discuss any of it with
people who haven't been having comparable experiences...His thinking
about schizophrenia runs much the same as ours about the lostness
when there is no communication -- after the odd things have
happened to the individual. He seems to have great good luck
using mescaline and aborting it with chlorpromazine..."
"I am engaged in speculation as to what makes the difference
between whether a subject uses the insights gained under LSD
progressively to transform his life. I have observed that
immaturity mitigates against it; also the schizoid personality.
Perhaps the `I can't' of the schizoid and the `I won't' of the
immature. Also perhaps the ongoingness of the pathological
process. And certainly how many swacks life has taken at the
individual which have landed. Both Sid and I feel that the most
important single factor is motivation -- the desire to get well.
This is necessary for the person to want to pay the price, in
suffering, of change. So many sick people only want to make the
effort intellectually..."
"With best wishes from us all -- to the whole family of you
and all of your retainers such as dogs, cats, fish, and the rest.
Love, Betty"
Box 1056 Weyburn, 3:2:58
Dear Betty:
"I have been remiss, but much afflicted by busyness and
travel... I was interested in your account of Herman Denber whom I
have only met once, hastily and without any real contact. I must
see that I repair that mistake. If on experiencing one is forced
to think or repress the trouble, for the analytically trained is
that he has been taught to learn not to repress, but when he
thinks, experience does not fit into any of the pigeon holes. It
is all very well trotting out the old oceanic uterine womb life
stuff but far from explaining anything that only makes it all the
odder. So we have to start on that toughest of all tasks,
overhauling preconceived notions...Your remarks about your
contaminating your research are absolutely true. The artist
contaminates the picture, the analyst contaminates the analysand.
The observer alters what is observed. However we must recognize
this and make allowances for it..."
"I was much struck by K. Ditman's groups of 3 - 6 alcoholics.
That may be the clue which you have been looking for with your
spoiled babies, perhaps they have to be involved in mankind and
not only symbolically but in some other "real" bit of mankind that
knows the score. What we have to ask is what are the special
circumstances which allow us to become involved -- possibly some
sort of ritual. Or look at it the other way round -- what stops
us from becoming involved? -- I must agree with your diagnosis on
unwillingness to give up our old preconceptions because they are
so cosy and because they smell of us! But that is only diagnosis;
the question is how do you get them to make the first step. It
can only be through trust in someone or something. Worry that one
around and you will have something. It is not the visions and the
marvels that matter -- it is a quality of feeling, very simple and
appallingly difficult. Feeling the transdimensional vector..."
"Deeply interested in the previous existences business - but
the great danger that it may become just a fad. It is now that
matters. Truth has no special time of its own..."
"Good wishes to Sid. Let me know how Al gets on. I suppose
we should cease hoping that he will try to do something and maybe
he will, just to surprise us. He is a lovely old rascal. Ever,
Humphry"
March 1, 1958
Dear Humphry:
"I have just finished transcribing your letter and I am
struck anew at how extraordinary you are at transmitting the
transdimensional vector, even within the harsh confines of
cuneiform cryptography! ..."
"First, the work goes well. We are polishing the article and
trying to say as many things as we can about deeper matters while
just reporting the study. And in the examination of semantic
methods, we have had to organize our thoughts more rigorously.
Several other events have contributed to this: I have been in
correspondence with Sandison; Abramson sent us a tape-recorded
reaction to our Current Thinking; and Denber's 1956 round-table at
the APA on Psychodynamic and Psychotherapeutic Aspects of
Mescaline and LSD...arrived. You have probably noted already the
articles, and I was particularly interested in the one by Ian
Stevenson...He so simply discusses the therapeutic aspects in terms
of the additional beauty, the distortions in perceptions teaching
us the effemeralness of our rigidity and indirectly leading to
peace of mind, and the Atman and non-Atman aspect of experience...
With Savage I read his article very carefully, and Sid and I went
over it paragraph by paragraph: we both feel very strongly that
the results he gets are the result of his own dynamics projected
onto the patient...Sid feels that he doesn't get the results with
LSD because he doesn't believe in it really; I feel that it is
more fundamental: he is afraid of the unconscious because he is
afraid of his own and has never faced himself deeply..."
"In the last few days the whole business about LSD and
therapy seems to be falling into place for me; whether we have the
right picture or not will have to be seen. I think that the great
value of it is to speed up the process of evolution -- the working
through of problems toward the clear for individuals -- the
progressive sandpapering away of the barriers which prevent the
transdimensional vector from operating. Now to an analyst I would
say that the process was to help speed the patient through an
understanding and unraveling of his problems to a new integration
within himself -- an acceptance of himself with respect to his
environment..."
"The other half of the process is the willingness to accept
pain short-range in order to understand: in other words, just as
one must be open to the cosmic, so also must one be open to facing
one's own problems -- and one's own self. This can and often is a
very painful business, and the secret of this is to go toward the
pain; to approach the terrifying and the horrible -- whether under
the drug or in active life."
"Now on the one hand we have the analysts who are completely
open to the problem area, but almost completely closed to the
integrative; at the other end of the spectrum we find Al who
yearns toward the religious and will always accept the rain from
heaven here, but who feels that the unpleasant floods and typhoons
of problems are works of the devil and not of God..."
"As you have so rightly said, LSD (and all the rest of them)
are neutral; it is the unconscious with all its wider experiences
which emerges. I think of it like a very rusty door which has
never been opened before consciously. There are many keys to the
door: stress, solitude, meditation, limited sensory environment,
drugs, etc. But these don't seem to work until the rusty door has
been forced open once. That is what LSD or mescaline can do:
force open the long-since stuck-shut door of the unconscious. And
then subsequently other keys are able to work...It is my opinion
that LSD therapy is ideally conducted through problem areas (of
course we let it go where it will and only deal with what comes
up; however with troubled people the problems emerge first) up to
the integrative experience. And here the frame of reference
becomes large enough to encompass any unconscious phenomena which
may occur...After all, our unconscious is not a monster lying in
wait to devour us if we once relax our vigilance and let him free;
it is the extension of reality and the path toward ultimate
reality and toward love (the only state of being that is worth
while)..."
"I have again digressed somewhat, and I'm afraid that I'm
beginning to sound like a sermonizer..."
"You know, Humphry, if I have a mission in life, I feel it is
to put the mystic back into the healing: to make the integrative
experience lucid and to be desired in psychiatry. And who knows,
maybe some small part of the cosmic can be worked in. I don't
think I shall get very far with this, but I want to make a start..."
(Discussion of patient who goes to mystic level and "sits there
and refuses to look at problems"...and a case of precipitating
a patient into a psychosis by a colleague)
"I was particularly struck by your discussion of the
weaseling we therapists go thru to put the blame on the patient
for `resistance'. It's just that we don't know the particular oil
to use to make the key work. I do know that there is such a
thing: subjects who have felt nothing on 100 or 200 gamma in
other circumstances begin to move in the second session at 50
gamma. But I think that it is, as you say, fundamentally a
question of trust...(Discussion of different "oils") I could get my
schizophrenic to go along with the drug and get the only relief he
knew; to let go and visit heaven and God. But the next day he was
just as afraid of his thoughts and just as desirous that I
transform him by a miracle without any pain or effort on his part.
I do feel that you are so right in saying that maybe some of our
patients are not well enough yet to wish to get well..."
"I don't feel that it is the ritual that is important; I feel
it is the combined field of the people present. A man and a woman
who are truly oriented toward health and open to the mystic are
usually sufficient; but the more individuals like this, the
greater the field which seems to create the power to sweep people
upward. You know, Humphry, it is so simple: when we are loving
there is no problem. But it is so appallingly difficult because
there can be no resistance at all or the channel is cut off."
"You know, LSD sessions for me are profound meditations. If
only that state could permeate our every moment of existence."
"Great good love to you, Betty"
And now to Hy Denber:
Manhattan State Hospital January 3, 1958
Dear Betty:
"I hope you will forgive this delay in answering your letter.
It was certainly not one to be thought over very lightly..."
"The description of your spontaneous feelings is very
interesting; as a matter of fact, it is fascinating. There was
some talk at one or two meetings that I have attended,
particularly the one at Keith Ditman's house, concerning the
possibility of self-induction of the LSD state. From what you
describe on page 2 of your letter, this would seem possible. What
seems more important to me, however, are the free associations you
might make to the various perceptual changes observed..."
"This question of regression to antiquity (`Greece, Egypt,
Jerusalem') that you describe as `a level of the unconscious of
the racial type or humanity-ages' is also fascinating. In my own
mescaline experience I vividly recall walking around the pyramids
of ancient Egypt. However, to get others to believe this is
another question; and I doubt if our `scientific minded
colleagues' would really believe it."
"I see that we are in agreement on the matter of `what is
psychosis.'..."
"The continuation of the discussion I had with Sid concerning
the nature of the unconscious will have to wait until we get
together again in May. This, without question, is a most
extraordinary subject, and studies with LSD and mescaline will go
far towards its clarification."
"Best regards and wishes for the New Year. Sincerely yours,
Hy (Herman C.B. Denber, M.D.)"
April 10, 1958
Dear Betty:
"There will indeed be a meeting in Rome from September 8-12.
Under separate cover, I am sending you the first Information
Bulletin and registration cards. Any paper you have to contribute
would be most welcome on the fourth day. I will give you further
details personally..."
"Best regards, Sincerely yours, Herman C.B. Denber per SS"
Long Island Biological Association May 10, 1958
Dear Dr. Eisner:
"Thank you for your letter of April 18. I have been working
with the Macy Foundation on a conference, but things go pretty
slowly in this area. You will be interested to know that Sandoz
has offered to partly subsidize a conference on therapy in
conjunction with supplementary financial support by the Macy
Foundation."
"As far as I know I am on one of the panels in Rome this
summer and hope I shall have the pleasure of seeing you there."
"Several copies of the reprints you requested will be sent to
you shortly."
"I do hope you'll visit New York in the near future. If so,
please let me know a little bit ahead of time so that I can make
suitable plans."
"Sincerely yours, Harold A. Abramson"
June 17, 1958
Dear Betty:
"I read over your paper with a great deal of interest. You
have something very original, which certainly bears reporting at
the Rome meeting. I wonder if you would be kind enough to send a
one page abstract to Dr. C. Radouco-Thomas, Route des Acacias 44,
Geneva, Switzerland, for inclusion in the program. Please do this
as soon as possible. As soon as my secretary can retype the
corrections in your paper, I will mail it back to you. It will
only be necessary for you to hand in the final paper at the time
of the Rome meeting..."
"Sincrely yours, Hy"
Hy Denber -- another wonderful mentor --for meetings and
later to help me write articles. Also, there was the excitement
and anticipation of meetings discussing what was closest to my
mind and heart -- and with colleagues who were involved in the
same fascinating work!
There were so many reasons to go, but the trip wasn't
certain. I discussed the possibilities later with Humphry in a
letter dated June 10, 1958:
"...Hy Denber was here just after our return, too, and he also
watered the tender shoots of my wild hypotheses. In fact he was
so sweet and interested that he asked me to give a short paper on
levels of the unconscious in Rome this September. I have written
something up for him to see what he thinks although there is only
a meager possibility of my going. Will has no desire to go, and I
am most reluctant to go without him. Despite the fact that my
dearest friend is in Rome and has a place for me, and my brother
has offered me his Frankfurst apartment and his Thunderbird. It
would be lovely for me, for I could stop and see Sandison, visit
Frederking in Hamburg, and then meet all the people who will be
there in Rome. And the paper is such a one as would never dared
be given in the States; it takes Europe to cushion its iconoclasm.
It is much along the lines that I have written to you, toned down,
and short to the point of just over five pages... There are a few
changes I want to make in semantics at points where Sid objected
to my thesis and I realized that I had not put it precisely enough
to obviate criticisms such as his."
The trip to Rome was not at all certain, despite all the
possibilities of visiting friends, colleagues, and my brother.
13th February, 1958
Dear Dr. Eisner,
"Thank you very much for your most interesting letter of
January 25th, and for enclosing the details of your personal
thought on the question of LSD treatment. It is very encouraging
to me to find that other people are obtaining much the same
results as we are here with treatment..."
"I think the matter which most interested me in your
communication was the use of music to stimulate the response to
LSD...We should very much like to make use of this suggestion of
yours and will be glad to let you know what results are obtained.
You may recall that Kluver, in his book on mescaline, mentions
that music can stimulate the effects of mescaline."
"You might be interested to hear about the kind of problems
which are exercising our attention at the moment. The first
problem is the necessity to attempt to demonstrate conclusively
whether or not therapy assisted by LSD is an effective method of
treating the psychoneuroses. We have felt for some time that it
would be desirable to devise a controlled trial, but the
difficulties are formidable..."
"The second question concerns the terms in which the LSD
experience can be described. The difficulties arise because those
of us using LSD for therapy tend to describe its effects in
psycho-analytical terms, whilst physiologists describe these
effects in physiological terms, and psychiatrists, whose
orientation is more organic, tend to describe the effects in the
language of orthodox psychiatric symptomology. Thus the average
psychiatrist tends to look upon the LSD experience as a model
psychosis and the psychoanalyst thinks of the LSD phenomena as an
alteration of the ego and the manifestation of the unconscious and
therefore something which is rational and in some way different
from psychosis. The physiologist is naturally more concerned with
changes in the bodily state and he thinks of the LSD experience as
being an alteration of physiological and biochemical balance in
the body which reminds him of intoxication. It has for a long
time been my desire to try to introduce some terminology which
would describe mental processes in terms which could satisfy the
physiologist, the general psychiatrist and the psychoanalyst. If
this could be achieved much of the confusion which exists in
psychiatry would, I think, disappear."
"The third problem concerns the mode of action of LSD. We
are increasingly noticing that after-reactions may occur some
months after the treatment has been concluded and in some cases
the patient has experienced very little in the way of LSD
phenomena until several treatments have been given..."
"It will be a great pleasure to hear from you again."
"Yours Sincerely, R. A. Sandison"
Since there were only a handful of us working with LSD as a
therapeutic tool, it seemed very important for me to make the trip
to Rome, and on the way to try and visit as many researchers who
were using LSD as possible. The correspondence with Ron Sandison
put Powick number one on the agenda, and going to England may well
have turned the decision about making the trip at all. But it was
a pretty extravagant ambition, and just a little unrealistic to
try to manage to visit everyone on the way to Rome. After all,
there was only so much time for a wife and mother leaving family
at home to go LSD-knowledge-gathering.
But in the end I did go. I wrote to Humphry from the plane
on August 24, 1958.
Dear Humphry:
"I hate to inflict the combination of my handwriting and air
travel on you; however there just wasn't time to manage at the
typewriter..."
"As you can see, I am at long last on the way to Rome. I
never thought I would make it, and I have not allowed myself to
get excited until after the plane took off. And now I have been
keeping the boiling point low by catching up on my correspondence
-- and also by sleeping. If I arrive in England with a charge of
steam, I'm afraid their reserve will be offended. I do get so
excited about new things -- and any possibility to talk about
LSD."
"I go first to Worcester to spend two days at Powick with
Sandison; then a day and a half in London with Dr. Thomas Ling.
Next to Hamburg with the hope of seeing Dr. Frederking. I didn't
have an answer to my letter -- so he is either out of town or wary
of strange, unattached visiting females. In any case, I
understand Hamburg is a lovely city and I shall just explore it if
I can't get him to see me -- Then to Munich to see old and dear
friends (Max Reinhardt's son and his wife), to Frankfurt to visit
my brother between his diplomatic courier trips -- and Zurich
(Jung is too frail to see me, his secretary has said, but I shall
see what can be done thru Sandison and friends I have in Zurich).
Next to Basel to put the screws on the Sandoz people for their
timidity about LSD and to Rome the 7th. My dearest friend is
there while her husband is making a picture, and it will be lovely
to see her..."I am enclosing a copy of my paper for your perusal; if
you think I have gone off the deep end, let me know and I shall
modify..."
"Not long ago we passed over Branden -- and I thought if only
I could jump out and run over to Weyburn for a while with you. I
examined your prairies from the air; I was brought up surrounded
by prairies in Kansas City, Missouri, the one hilly and rolling
spot in the midst of our corn and wheat belt..."
"I was most disappointed that Tom Powers won't see you in
Weyburn. He is too busy to see me in New York, too, so I shall
come back over the pole the 15th. Just as well for Will and the
little ones. My only regret about this trip is that Will couldn't
come and the children aren't old enough..."
"The seminar was unbelievable, Humphry. There never was one
like it, and there never should be another. This was a group
whose repression had been manipulated in the name of God until
they were volcanic beneath the impenetrable controls. Also, I
have never been afraid of patients acting out -- have never had it
until this seminar when I structured it so they could. And I
experienced, through the group, the dynamics of the acting out
person who has been repressed. I had one boy on the verge of
schizophrenia whom I never would have accepted had I known -- not
for what we were doing. But with an M.D. there we had
barbiturates to calm the cortex and thorazine to slow down the
mid-brain. And from this boy and his wife I really learned about
the sado-masochistic dynamic...From the group I got many insights re
the psychopath. Nuts to the theory he has no guilt. He carries
such a load that he can't tolerate a hair-breadth more but must
discharge it immediately in action. Also I learned of the
necessity of discharge: first of the core (sometimes this must be
led up to gradually with drainage of the pus off) and then the
day-to-day accumulation of waste products until the spot dries up
of itself."
"We worked with 22 mg. of mescaline plus 5 mg. of methedrine
alternating with 10 gamma of LSD. The last day they took 25 gamma
LSD and those with strong repression (about 3 of 10) had 50 gamma.
Don't undersell low doses and intensive psychotherapy. I think
lives were changed that week. Now of course the insights must be
put into practice in everyday life, but this is possible -- IF the
core is discharged enough -- and IF the person is committed
(unconsciously as well as consciously) to the process of maturity.
These people all are a remarkable group."
"Art -- painting was a wonderful unraveling and -- as it was
before -- music as a rest at night from the rigors of the day-long
therapy. But the real miracle was clay. It saved us from two
violent actions -- served as a surrogate because the people had
been so long repressed that once they let it out fully only
`killing' would help. I had never seen the deep dynamic of `kill
or be killed'. And it made me sick to see it with the real
pathology of schizophrenia (usually paranoia) in order to be
`saved' (and/or `save the world') I must kill or be killed. One
night we pumped the really sick kid full of drugs and put the man
he respected most in the cabin with him -- and Will and I hid the
axe. Okay after a good night's sleep."
"As I made clear to the group, such a situation is possible
only with people who are open in both directions: toward God; and
toward knowing themselves. It is only possible in a highly
special place: we were in the redwoods in beautiful isolated
country where much discussion and prayer and self knowledge to do
the best in one's power has taken place. There must be an expert
in charge, too...I was almost throttled, and if I had been afraid,
he would have hurt me seriously. It was an extraordinary
demonstration to me of the power of `resist not evil' -- and what
can be done..."
"But the unconscious was operating magnificently. Of course
only one thing is important -- LOVE -- the absence of barriers.
That is LIFE and that is GOD. With love to you - Betty"
********
The English are reserved, Ron Sandison is shy to boot, and
I'll never forget my first meeting with him on that trip to Powick
-- after all the scholarly and intellectual correspondence between
us.
There was no one at the station in Worcester when I arrived
on the train from London. Maybe I had made a mistake in trains?
Spying a schedule high on the wall, I jumped up on a nearby
bench to get a closer look. To my embarrassment, as I turned from
my undignified position, I saw a head pop out from around the
corner, and quickly pop back. This at least gave me time to jump
down, rein in my flaring skirt and pull up to professional stance.
"Dr. Sandison?" I inquired tentatively.
It was indeed he, and with a completely straight face, bless
him! My fascinating visit of discovery of other people's work
with LSD had begun, and Ron never once mentioned my undignified
position when first he saw me. True English manners.
(The following is dated September 20, 1958; to Humphry)
"I have never had any people as nice to me as they were at
Powick. And was I impressed by the hospital! It looked like
something out of Dickens, but the treatments make our VA look like
a sterile steam roller. Only one locked ward: the refractory
men's. Much enlightened treatment going on: two, three and four
LSD treatments a day, pentathol abreactions; all sorts of
psychotherapy; and amazing ECT (electric shock treatment). I must
say that I was forced to change my mind about ECT after observing
their procedure, and the most fascinating LSD group therapy work.
Unfortunately Dr. Spencer, who is doing that, wasn't there, but I
did get to see the room and to talk to the nurse who sits in.
Also saw one patient; the rest were on home leave. It's a group
of very sick people, mostly schizophrenic, I would say, some 8 of
them, who meet twice a week in the same room and are given huge
doses of LSD. There are dummies they can wreak vengeance on,
there is sand, water, colors, blocks, darts -- anything you can
imagine to help discharge cores of repression which are
unreachable any other way. It reminded me enormously of the group
therapy sessions I have in the summer -- only under very low doses
but with patients who are really 'normal' and just trying to clean
themselves up...And to me it touches on the possible key to the
acting out person (which anyone is when a deep repression is
lifted). The secret is the discharge of the pile (of hostility
and guilt) which has fused from long since -- without adding
additional guilt."
I can't remember much more about that visit to Powick except
for the constant activity with patients, doing an LSD session
myself with Dr. Jensen from Norway who was also visiting,
discussions with doctors far into the night, and the beautiful
English countryside. However, I have burned into my memory the
worn steps of the hospital at Powick, concave at their reddish
centers from the generations of patients who had patiently trod
them almost hollow.
The other strong memory was of seeing the good of ECT,
electrical shock treatments, a method which I had felt was one of
torture. I saw patients come willingly to have their treatments,
in fact sometimes begging for one early and no one with the fear
and horror I had seen in the States. Ron explained to me that
they used a form of curare and a relaxant so that the patients did
not have the traumatic experiences I had observed at the VA at
home. But I was puzzled about the LSD dosages they used.
"...my whole time at Powick, and also echoing down to London,
was spent puzzling about why they used so much higher dosages than
we do and also had longer treatment times. On the whole their
patients are sicker than ours; however they are not sicker than
the worst ones I did -- they just have more of them. The great
difference lies in two factors, I think: the fact that I stay with
my patients the whole time that the drug session is in progress;
and my use of extra aids such as music, photographs, mirror, etc.
I think the continuous therapy is very important. The doctors at
Powick see patients only about an hour at the height of the
reaction unless the patient calls for them specially. A nurse or
nurses aid is with them so they are not alone, but there is no
therapeutic manipulation. Nor is there music. And these two
factors make an enormous difference in my opinion."
(Letter of September 20, 1958 to Humphry continues:)
"Then I went to London, and Dr. Ling kindly took me in hand.
I visited two remarkable places: Marlborough Day Hospital and
Bromnley Psychiatric Clinic. I wish that I could institute a
combination of the two here in Los Angeles...I was amazed to see
that Dr. Ling uses LSD widely not only at the Day Hospital, but
also in private practice with at least one patient a night. I
didn't feel that he had quite the background of experience with
the drug which others have had..."
"From London I went to Hamburg to visit Frederking, but for
some reason he wouldn't see me. His English is not good (although
better than my German), and his nurse reported that he was
"regrettably, out of town". Shortly after I returned home I had a
letter from a friend who did see Frederking, a chemist, and I
shall quote from his letter (there was an interpreter). 'He
(Frederking) now uses LSD he estimates on 20 to 25% of his
patients, usually those that do not respond to the regular
psychotherapy. He is not a disciple of Jung but thinks that work
with LSD may add support to some of Jung's theories.' Don't we
all! And also some of Freud's!"
"To finish up the trip quickly: to Munich to visit a dear
friend; to Frankfurt to visit my brother (and seven couriers had
to shift trips around to get him there to see me and these other
friends of his from Warsaw and Vienna); to Switzerland to hope to
see Jung although I had a letter: no luck... (he is not well and
was away on vacation) and to Sandoz. As to the latter I shall
save my tale to you for some time leisurely. Suffice it to say
that I was ready to write the Swiss off my book as being
paraAmerican in certain traits. I feel more kindly since Rome and
since time has soothed my fevered brow, but I got so charged that
I was rather rough with one of the VIPs there. It was along the
line of reminding (them) of their responsibility toward LSD and
toward the research possible with it, and I think it might have
helped because we ended up both friends of primitive art. I had a
kind letter from them and Hofmann and Cerletti were very nice in
Rome, so perhaps I did some good. I hope so. Thence to Rome."
That visit to England and the subsequent gatherings of those
of us working with LSD in Rome were among the most absorbingly
interesting times of my life. It was not only hearing what each
one of us who was working with LSD had done, it was hearing what
effect it had and why, what might have been a different and better
way to use the drug, what each of us thought was the optimal
method of dealing with different kinds of patients and situations,
and basically and continually, the consideration of psychedelics
in all their ramifications.
There was only one other time as electric in discussion and
discovery, the Congress of Social Psychiatry in 1964 when Ernie
Katz (the psychiatrist I was to work with), Ron Sandison and I met
Stanislov Grof and discovered the whole spectrum of what he had
been doing in Czechoslovakia -- healing patients and having them
produce art which reflected their condition. And Joyce Martin was
there, then, too, and the blonde lady who sat with Joyce's
patients whose name escapes me. What fascinating times, and what
learning!
Rome was wonderful for other reasons, too -- all the wonders
of ancient and modern history, and the fact that my closest
friend, M., who had shepherded me through my LSD sessions, was in
Rome at the same time as the Conference because her husband was
making a movie. They had a villa outside of Rome on the Appian
Way, and it was a joy to arrive there and be with friends before
the Conference started.
After the meetings began, I moved into the penzione that Will
and I had loved so much at the head of the Spanish Stairs on the
Piazza Trinite de Monte. What better and more romantic place with
its view of Rome from the second-story roof garden! And what
convenience to be within walking distance of most of the treasures
of the city and practically on the bus-line that ran out to the
huge Mussolini-built complex where the meetings were held. Every
one of my friends who visited my penzione thought that it was the
most wonderful spot to stay in all of Rome! Plus the fact that
every time I came home and made my way up the Spanish Stairs I was
the subject of all sorts of compliments, and sometimes had to
dodge to avoid being pinched! Very Italian!
"It was so beautiful, Humphry, and it was either that Will
and I had been there in the late fall and between Christmas and
New Year's ten years ago -- or else the fact that I've had LSD
since, but the colors -- I never saw Rome this way before. In
fact the whole trip was one continual pageant of color from the
lush green of well-watered England...to the pale white and browns of
Rome in the distance AND the orangish browns, the rosy hues, and
that indescribable color of old Roman brick. I think their
sculpture was terrible and I rather look askance at the
architecture, but oh my, how they could put one beautiful brick
upon another and make it last! Everywhere one looks in Rome there
is some historically jagged monument of the fast-building, long-
lasting Romans!"
I reported on everything in that letter to Humphry.
"I scarcely know where to start in reporting to you; I am
caught between the dilemma of sounding like an itinerary or
hopping about like hot fat on a griddle."
(First, the information papers on adrenochrome: very technical,
and I was apologetic.)
"I did do better with LSD, psilocybin, and ololiluqui...First,
for the least important. Kinross-Wright of Texas finally found
one bush in Mexico producing the seeds (the Cuban ones hadn't
worked for people and he thought the Mexican variety might be
different). He got quite a lot of seeds and tried them every way
that they could and all ended up with negative results. His
theory is that the curanderos or the magic men or whoever made use
of herbs for changes of consciousness, deliberately misnamed the
seeds of riveaucormymbosa (ololiuqui) as the active agent when it
was either something from the belladonna plant or else the
mushrooms..."
"As to psilocybin, both Hofmann and Cerletti (head of Sandoz)
reported on it -- Hofmann on the chemical aspects, and Cerletti on
the pharmacology...I had talked to Fanchamps of Sandoz in Basel, and
he had been rather unenthusiastic, saying that they didn't feel it
was much of a hallucinogen. Although he admitted on questioning,
that some who tried it did have hallucinations. I was pleasantly
surprised to talk to Hofmann and have him say that he felt it was
much like LSD..."
"Delay (of Paris) seemed to feel that psilocybin falls
somewhere between mescaline and LSD. He had 20 patients with a
daily dose. This latter makes me wonder, because if there is
tolerance, this might vitiate his results. He speaks of 'deformed
perception -- changes in appearance of objects', etc, but feels
that it is more illusion than hallucination -- more a waking dream
state than hallucination. But this can be said just as readily of
mescaline and LSD; in fact, Frederking does. There is change in
space and time; change in size of body parts; depersonalization,
etc. Sounds very familiar, n'est-ce pas?... There seems to be
enough available now, and Cerletti told me to ask our Sandoz man
for some. They suggest about 5 mg. as being the proper dose..."
"So next to the LSD. There are surprisingly many individuals
working with it here and there. Most that I heard about in
England, and what a wonderfully free hand they have with it,
compared to us... There is a man in East Germany named Leuner
working with it. He reported at Barcelona (supposed to be one of
the two good papers, according to a clinician). Second hand I
understand he is getting the same sort of levels of consciousness
we are, and is reported to talk in Jungian terms. Then there are
two men in Italy, Genoa to be exact, Ghiberti and Gregoretti.
Unfortunately, their paper was at a time when mine was also, and I
couldn't hear it. Then there is Cornelius van Rhijn in Holland
who is putting his subjects into a completely dark room and coming
up with nice juicy unconscious things. He seems completely
Jungian oriented. He also has some bias which rather disturbs me
but which I didn't get to talk to him long enough to unravel...He
insists that it is necessary that the subject be in a dark room:
that a mask isn't enough. This doesn't make sense to me unless he
is saying that he means limited environment by the dark room; in
other words that it is a sound-proofed room as well. Wesley,
Hartmann, Chandler and the bunch of them working with LSD here all
use masks and find it enough for their purposes; they also have a
black hole of Calcutta room which they say is even better, but
still needs more soundproofing. Anyway, I got van Rhijn together
with Abramson, so that he could be on the agenda for May...
Abramson has talked Sandoz out of some money and Macy has a little
more than matched the amount in order to have a gathering of all
of us working therapeutically with LSD. It is to be in May before
the Amer. Psych. Assn. meetings, which are in Philadelphia this
year. How about your getting a paper to read before the APA and
coming to the LSD-therapy conference, too? ..."
"There was one day spent on the old faithful but tiresome: is
it a schizophrenic or organic reaction with LSD, etc. I felt
called on to get up from the floor afterwards and say that I felt
we were asking the wrong question. There was a wonderfully bright
young man as reporter -- Joel Elkes, now of St. Elizabeth's in
Washington (and most charming, to boot, and I'll bet some kind of
mystic)...He also talked about the coding of information and
different sets of coders were in control under the drug and non-
drug condition...And then there was the usual animal vs. man one.
The outstanding speaker here was Jim Olds, who until recently was
at UCLA. Another of the enormously bright young men who are going
to crack this whole problem wide open -- taken all together, each
in his own area of work. He's the one who has found the pleasure
centers in the hypothalamus...It is so good to see these young and
very bright men really pushing back the horizons and loving every
new step revealed by the increasing light of their researches."
There were all sorts of activities for those of us attending
the Conference -- from the first night welcoming speech at Castel
San Angelo,
"all lighted up, and to walk around the ramp in a circle and
look down on the Tiber and across to Rome sparkling with lights
and lighted monuments...there was a small boat on the river which
was a mass of streaming lights and playing bongo rhythms! Then
the next day to Castel Gondolfo for a very fine address by the
Pope; back to the Campodolio (what a magnificent view from the
balcony of the Forum and Coliseum) for a welcome by Roman
dignitaries; and then one night to Villa d'Este which was a
fantasy of magic light and water and mystic trees. I've never
seen or experienced anything like it outside of LSD...All the while
that I went places...back to my two most moving sights: Moses and
the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. It was so much for me that I
think I dissociated a little during the week and became part of
all the sights and sounds and wonders I was experiencing."
At Villa d'Este, I wandered down the levels of mist and water
and light with Albert Hofmann, the discoverer of LSD who also
worked out the structure of psilocybin (a charming man whom I had
met in Basel), his wife and Ron Sandison. And all of us felt as
though we were in an LSD world.
I can't remember the actual reading of my paper. All I
remember is a huge vast hall with earphones on every seat for the
translations into English and French. I don't remember German and
Italian, but maybe they were available, too. It was the last day
of the talks, and Sid came just before time to give our papers. I
remember telling him that the sound system wasn't very loud, and
he might want to speak up in order to be heard.
"Oh, just be yourself, Sid," said Ilse, his German-born wife
disgustedly. And I can't remember now whether he actually spoke
up or not.
I remember that I did, and I really enjoyed it, although
there wasn't a huge crowd, it being the last day. But I felt like
a true pioneer, reporting the results of my explorations to far
and unknown lands.
A fitting end to a magical trip. But one must always come
back to earth.
First, back to the summer before Rome.
Tuesday, June 10, 1958
Dear Humphry:
"The research contract at the hospital was over the end of
March, but I stayed on until about the middle of April to finish
up patients. Then we went to the Midwest for three weeks, and
since coming back I have been trying to find an office. I'm going
to be associated with a friend of mine, P.O., also a clinical
psychologist, who has just come out of the army. We found an
office which was just right, but alas, the landlord was a tyrant
and presented a 7-page lease wherein we couldn't whistle, sing,
have a bicycle, loiter in the corridors, sleep, have a get-rich-
quick scheme, and generally waived all proper rights of a lessee.
So we are involved in inspecting every `for rent' sign we can see
in Westwood. We have chosen Westwood because it is convenient for
both of us, particularly for me. I can't be too far from home or
it cuts down on the hours I can see patients. I have nine hours
so far a week, and have turned down more until we are set up and
until fall comes when school schedules settle down and we are back
on standard (more ways than one) time. The only sad part is that
I am not doing any LSD work at all. Several events have
transpired to make Sandoz tighten up down here, and they are
reluctant to give the drug unless there is a psychiatric set-up,
preferably in an institution. I understand the wisdom of this
decision, but it seems too bad that all my experience with the
drug is at present lying fallow...I have taken to putting patients
into an LSD-like state...Hereby hangs quite a tale, and I think
presages some important insights into the unconscious."
"Two psychologist friends who had had LSD mentioned that
patients of theirs whom they had had for some time suddenly found
themselves on the couch seeing visions. The therapists followed
the lead quickly and encouraged the patients, with good results as
to insights into their problems. They found that the process
could be continued for from 20 minutes to an hour, but that if
they got uncomfortable, the patient stopped. In other words,
there is some indication that it is the openness of the
therapist's unconscious which makes this possible, plus of course
the willingness of the patient to allow the process to
happen...Since then I have used the device periodically, but it is
possible for him (a patient) to have the visions without any
music, in a bare room where there are just two chairs. I have
found it very helpful as a therapist because it always gives the
crux of the particular conflict uppermost at the moment..."
Betty
Thursday, July 17, 1958
Dear Humphry:
"The AMA paper went well, Sid and I appeared on television
(which was great fun to see how it all worked), and a report of
the paper which was greatly garbled hit the front page of the
Chronicle. Reports such as that make me ambivalent about
publicity. The two discussants were unusually kind, and mentioned
the necessity for controlled studies, the difficulty of separating
out the variables, etc., which we know only too well..."
"Charles Savage, who is working at the Institute for
Behavioral Sciences, commented on the paper, and also Paul Hoch,
who was chairman. They came to lunch with us afterwards, and I
had a wonderful time. Dr. Savage has a brilliant mind, but prides
himself on his iconoclasm while displaying a naive faith in pure
Freud (this is how I perceive it). Dr. Hoch, on the other hand,
is very wary of anything other than the biochemical; however he
had some very good insights...I look forward to renewing my inquiry
when next we meet again. I do hope I get to Rome..."
"Best love to you and your family... Betty"
August 24, 1958 (a fragment of the letter on my way to Rome)
Dear Humphry:
"Despite my new -- and wonderful office and burgeoning
practice, I have chopped patients off down to the minimum to cover
expenses and those I am responsible to. My associate, P.O., is
wonderful and takes the overflow..."
October 14, 1958
Dear Humphry:
"There is suddenly a flurry of interest in my working with
LSD again. The psychological associations here have made it
tough, demanding a hospital setting for patients. We must look
around and find a convalescent home that will do. Wish we had
some of the great nursing homes I saw in London -- or better yet a
day clinic. The only one in operation is owned by a
psychoanalyst, and the other one building is part of a mental
health center which is being brought into existence by a group of
20 analysts...It really shouldn't be so difficult when one wants to
do research into the mind to be allowed to do it. But I am
impatient; all these things work out in their own best way.
"Best love to you, Jane, Helen, and 2/3 (the coming baby)
Betty"
February 18, 1959
Dear Humphry:
"I have been waiting anxiously for news, and it has been so
long that I have become concerned about you and the family..."
"Our correspondence seems to have bogged down ever since your
letter written in October to me was locked away by your secretary
and didn't arrive until November. I have since had my interest
whetted by little remarks dropped by Sid (picked up via Gerald)
about the parapsychology meeting...I loved the glimpse into it you
gave me in your paper `Not Nearly Crazy Enough', but you only
alluded to things -- you didn't spell them out...I have run across a
book written on the Amarita mushroom by an M.D. (Puharich) who had
been engaged in psychical research...Anyway, he found that the
Farraday cage enormously jumps ESP and that so also does the
Amarita mushroom..."
"We have had a busy four months -- the loss of a dear friend,
Mexico over Christmas and New Years -- meeting my brother and a
group of old friends on the island of Cozumel off Yucatan, and
then all the bugs after we got back which we hadn't had before.
We are just emerging from a violent session with reverse
peristalsis, and then a gallopingly infected ear of DB (the four-
year old terror of a son)..."
"We loved meeting Nick Chwelos and his wife -- what very nice
people. He is doing some exciting things. There was a big fight
the night of his talk as there were a couple of analysts present,
and they just didn't want to hear evidence of what he had been
doing; they just wanted to talk against LSD..."
"I've been working with LSD again (in conjunction with Marion
Dakin, M.D.) since before Christmas, and have been running down
some very interesting things, I think. I'm after what
precipitates people into psychosis -- I know that Sid is, too...
There is so much in my head here that I think I'd like to see you
before I explode it all. Will you be coming down this way? Will
you be going to the LSD conference at Princeton in April, the 23rd
and 24th?..."
"But enough, enough. Best love to you from all of us.
Betty"
This was a time of beginnings -- a new office, a new
practice, a new way of operating.
For the sake of my professional societies, I had to
hospitalize the LSD patients, and while we found a small
convalescent-type hospital, mostly for mental cases, it was still
very expensive for patients to have weekly sessions of gradually
increasing dosage. Also, Dr. Dakin was actively involved, and
that added even more expense.
So it was with great excitement that I read the report of a
talk given at the spring 1959 meeting of the LA Group Therapy
Association by Dr. Alvarado Pearson. Dr. Pearson, of the LA
County Clinic on Alcoholism, reported that alcoholics would begin
talking about their problems after injections of 20 to 50 mg. of
Ritalin (methylphenidate). Often there were therapeutic
abreactions which were very beneficial. And all this occurred
without benefit of any therapeutic work on the part of the
doctors.
This report made us think that this might be a very
effective, safe method for the temporary lowering of ego defenses
which we might substitute for the first one, and maybe two, LSD
sessions. Also, all to the good was the fact that Ritalin is a
relatively mild central nervous stimulant somewhere in potency
between caffeine and the amphetamines. Further, doses of Ritalin
can be given orally, intramuscularly or intravenously, with
minimal side effects.
Alas, the mode of action was unknown, but we found, as we
searched the literature, that there were several papers on
Ritalin's capacity to enhance verbalization, facilitate the
expression of anger, and sometimes lead to "explosive catharsis"
which became therapeutic abreactions.
Just what we were looking for! Dr. Dakin and I agreed, and
we made plans for me to have a trial dosage, my procedure being
never to have any drug given to a patient that I had not first
tried myself. But this was not to be; an emergency arose before I
could have my trial dose.
We had an 18-year old girl in LSD treatment whose juvenile
delinquency covered an incipient paranoid schizophrenia. Her
sexual acting out and lying had ceased after six LSD sessions, but
she became resistant to moving more deeply into therapy. Unknown
to us, she had spit out half of her LSD dosage at the seventh
session, but still had a full LSD reaction. At the eighth session
(150 gamma), she told me how upset she had been that half the
dosage had worked so well. She had planned to play "neutral" at
this session, but again she had not counted on the effects of LSD.
For six hours she "walked in a gray fog". Hostile and depressed,
she spent the night on the locked ward where she refused to speak
to anyone.
The next day, Dr. Dakin gave her an injection of 10 mg. of
Ritalin intramuscularly, and she was driven by her parents to the
appointment with me. She maintained a surly silence until about
15 minutes after the injection when a dramatic change occurred.
Her face became flushed, and she burst into tears. A session was
held with real affect and insight on her part. Toward the end of
the appointment, 45 minutes after she had burst into tears, the
defenses began to reconstitute, she began to withdraw, and her
insight diminished. Five days later she was given 100 gamma of
LSD and was successful in breaking thru her resistance to going
more deeply in therapy.
The following week I tried the Ritalin.
September 2, 1959.
"Today I had 10 mg. IM of Ritalin at 12 o'clock. It is now
10 pm, and the effects still haven't worn off. Wow!"
"I had foolishly allowed only an hour for it, since I had
observed that it lasted about 45 minutes to an hour..."
"About two minutes after the shot, my legs felt weak, and by
the time M. and I got back to the office I was beginning to feel
physically swamped...Lay down on the couch and was inundated with
waves of the drug as with LSD. Only this more like waves of black
ocean -- funny it was black in patches, blacker, rather, as though
it was different shades of black like an abstract painting.
Anyway, it washed over and through me, and my left arm began to
hurt like fury, so I knew it was the old dependency problem.
There was one center, the hard, practical part, from the eyes up,
which seemed not to be affected by the drug. But they finally got
some music on, and then it let go with the rest...when music,
symbolic on another level, is played, the more controlled part can
let go to it. Washed over and over me and disintegrated, but
unfortunately the time limit was on my mind, and I couldn't let go
to it. I did sway and weave and couldn't walk properly; they
tested me...By end of hour I could cope, the motor thing was gone,
and I did therapy rest of afternoon by dint of much control..."
"Everything took great effort. I talked as little as
possible, but had trouble following what patients said and had to
make myself be logical and discriminating...After (last patient's)
session...I almost went to pieces. Couldn't coordinate, had to
think every move out, was just like after the first LSD
experience. Was even afraid to drive home, but did.
Incidentally, canceled out all patients who were driving selves
for Ritalin...Was sexual stimulation all along, but wasn't a man or
any man but seemed to be involved in problem with mother and
letting go to her as authority which I seem to feel as something
homosexual which must be done...Earlier -- lovely luminous quality
of light in everyday, and M. and P.O. look(ed) beautiful."
This was the way that the incomparably useful Ritalin
(methylphenidate hydrochloride) came into operation for us and for
what soon became "the group". With Ritalin and later adding the
body work (deep massage on the order of rolfing), we soon had an
extraordinary tool for helping people to change and grow.
Further, when LSD was withdrawn from use by Sandoz, we had an
alternative drug for our purposes and one which could be used in
many ways.
In fact, Dr. Dakin (and later Dr. Maynard Bransdsma and Dr.
Ernest Katz, and I -- and two other psychotherapists who began to
work with Ritalin) did a fairly exhaustive study on Ritalin. We
tried different methods: 1. orally, in dosages from 10 mg. to 70
mg.; 2. intramuscularly in single injections ranging from 10 to 50
mg, and in the earliest work in split doses with an interval of
half an hour to an hour between injections which ranged from 20
mg. + 20 mg. to 200 mg. + 200 mg.; 3. intravenously from 15 to
50mg., the usual dose being 25 mg. Further, oral, intramuscular
and intravenous Ritalin were used in combination with
psychedelics: 103 individual treatments with LSD, 15 group
sessions where everyone (except me) took the drug, 5 group
sessions with Sansert and Ritalin, one each with psilocybin,
peyote and mescaline. It was also used in rigorous sessions, that
most patients hated but which were extremely beneficial for them,
Ritalin with carbogen (70% oxygen, 30% carbon dioxide; 402
treatments). Intravenous Ritalin was also used eleven times with
sodium amytal or pentothal. One might say that our studies
covered the water front! Or certainly the Ritalin spectrum.
In fact, if you like statistics, from August 1959 to July
1968 there were a total of 1,246 Ritalin administrations, alone
and in combination with other drugs. And there were more after
that, continuing until injectable Ritalin was withdrawn from the
market by Ciba. In case one is curious about the subjects, there
were a total of 138 patients during that first nine years, 67
women and 71 men, aged 15 to 72. All patients were in long-term
therapy, and we found that a series of Ritalin sessions,
appropriately spaced, was ideally suited for character analysis,
and was an ideal precursor for LSD sessions.
However, I got a little ahead of my story when I mentioned
group sessions, when I hadn't even mentioned the group.
The "group" occurred quite by chance. In January of 1960, we
were well established at the hospital and doing so many sessions
that I needed an assistant in order that two sessions could be
held at the same time. One morning, my assistant, L.A., was
delayed by a freeway accident and was late getting to the
hospital. Since two patients had been given their dose of LSD by
the head nurse, and one of the cardinal rules we had established
was never to leave a patient who had had a drug alone, there was
no alternative other than to put the two patients together.
One patient was a youngish "Peck's bad boy" with underlying
access to his feelings, and the other was a beautiful starlet who
lived through her superficial image. I had expected the
combination to be disastrous, but to all of our surprise, it
speeded up both sessions. Both patients broke through previously-
held resistances. As family members and friends arrived at the
hospital (we had found it helpful to have invited people come
toward the end of the session to participate as the session wound
down), they were included in the double session with added
therapeutic gain.
It was a short step from there to having specially-invited
people present at sessions and for participants to gather after
the sessions were over for potluck dinners and to discuss the
unusual happenings of the day. We soon observed that the group of
patients undergoing drug-potentiated therapy formed creative
relationships with each other, and together formed a matrix within
which therapeutic change was greatly enhanced -- a matrix which
was able to encompass and allow the rapid changes which were
occurring with the patients. Individuals might come and go, since
patients came from out-of-town for drug work, but a certain number
of people stayed together to form the basis of a continuing group.
It was only a matter of time before group drug sessions were
given. Actually, the very first "group" drug session was the one
that occurred in Sid Cohen's office with W. Wilson, the founder of
A.A., his friend Tom Powers, Sid and me. While that was the
"first" group session, the most awesome one was the one held on
Halloween in the mid 60's when 22 participants took LSD. I didn't
have any drug because I never took drugs at group sessions. Those
who were present at that wild Halloween session well remember the
actress who refused to come out from under the piano, and the
patient who talked in voices and had to put her hands in pans of
water to disengage from the witch inside or wherever it was.
Along with other major occurrences!
The important work of the group was that it served as a
matrix for people going through rapid change, and as an
environment where insights could be turned into habit patterns.
In fact in the 70's we had a number of different living situations
which also helped patients incorporate their rapid change into
their everyday lives.
The individuals in the group were also drawn together to try
to understand this extraordinary drug and its effects on the mind
and psyche, and we had many visitors. Besides doctors from our
area and San Francisco, Humphry Osmond came from Canada, Hy Denber
from New York, and later Willi Arendsen-Hein visited us from
Holland, and Stan Grof, then of Czechoslovakia, stayed with us for
about ten days to watch our sessions and observe our methods.
When two RAND engineers and a professor of mathematics from
UCLA joined us, the research group was born, although much of what
we had been doing all along was research.
Meeting weekly for a number of years, the research group
examined all facets of LSD and its effect on interpersonal
dynamics and individual growth, while of course translating it
into personal terms for every-day applications. In 1967 five of
us from the research group even traveled to Huatla in southern
Mexico and took the "magic mushroom" with Maria Sabina.
In fact, the whole group became involved with Mexico, and for
eight years we had a volunteer school in rural Mexico, during
Stateside vacations, teaching English, art and sports. We adults
in the group started the school, with the help of whatever group
members who could come, helping with the teaching. Later the
younger members of group took over. The first year we were
arrested three times: by Immigration, by the Army, and by the
Federales, but our protector, the Lt. Governor of Nayarit, always
got us out of jail and back into operation again, and we never
paid a cent of "mordida". Our time in Mexico is a story all by
itself, including the 28 children we brought up to live at one of
the communes for the school year in order to become proficient in
English.
Communal living in group houses began when the young students
in group, most of the almost dozen of whom were in college, wanted
to live together. They found a house to rent in Santa Monica, and
later they moved into a house which one of their members bought.
As the group living situation proved creative for growth, a young
marrieds' house was established, and a third group house came into
being with usually four adults there to take care of the Mexican
children while they were in Santa Monica for the school year.
At one point, group members lived in four communal houses
(despite our battles with zoning authorities): the student group;
the young marrieds; a complex of apartments; and adolescent girls
from several families lived with a group family in the valley;
while two adolescent boys joined our son and lived with my husband
and me.
Living together in a democratic fashion, working together in
the drug sessions, and enjoying recreations together was very
growth-producing and provided a situation for dealing with
problems 24 hours a day. Sort of like a therapeutic community,
but with many varied living possibilities. Although many group
members called the group their "real family", people learned
through group experience to relate to their biological families
with a rapport and understanding generally not available through
"talk" therapy.
Perhaps at this time it might be helpful to describe a
typical course of treatment of a patient who came to us for drug
therapy/character analysis, patients referred from many sources
for the special work we were doing. After an initial interview
with me to see whether drug treatment might be appropriate,
patients had complete physical examinations by one of the
physician involved in our work. With the high-dose Ritalin work,
ECGs were given by Dr. Dakin before any dose of Ritalin greater
than 50 mg. was injected. At the initial psychological interview,
suggestions were made to the patient to help him or her bring more
order into their lives: 1. disorder is a poor foundation on which
to build creative change; 2. the rapidity of change which occurs
with drug-potentiated therapy cannot be incorporated and
integrated without a stable base. Later, with the Ritalin and
carbogen and the ketamine, Dr. Ernest Katz, a psychiatrist,
interviewed and followed every patient, and gave the injections
during carbogen and ketamine sessions.
The new patients became immersed in and an integral part of
the group matrix of change. They became a part of an ongoing
therapy group, all of whose members had had drug sessions. These
members had been involved for various lengths of time in the
process the new patient was entering; they had experienced the
pay-off of what we called "structure" (activities for order), and
they had learned by painful experience how best to integrate drug
sessions. Most of all, they "cared"; the esprit de corps of a
group of individuals undergoing this type of therapy is awesome.
The first session in the sequence of drug treatments, 25 mg.
of Ritalin intramuscularly, was used to set in a firm commitment
to non-violence. Violence is an increasing problem in our society
today, and when drugs which lower inhibitions and dissolve
controls are used, both the patient and those around him must be
protected from physical harm. Furthermore, violent elements are
usually found at the core of a character disorder. By making a
commitment to the non-occurrence of physical violence, and by
making a clear distinction between physical violence and/or verbal
or fantasy violence, the patients became free to discharge
hostility up to the point of violence with words, noises, or in
fantasy. The commitment was made in the form of a simple
statement to each person present at the session in turn: "I (and
the person says his or her name) will not hurt myself or anyone
else physically during this session."
This initial session of the setting-in of non-violence could
last from thirty minutes to the two and one-half hours it took for
one dangerously psychopathic patient -- just to repeat correctly
the simple one-sentence commitment to six people. Following the
successful and correct statement of non-violence to each person
present at the session, the patient was encouraged -- even
compelled -- to discharge hostility vocally. If he were unable to
do so, saying he didn't feel any hostility, he was directed to
make any kind of sound. He had to yell, growl, or even shout the
alphabet until he reached the point when he could experience the
freedom that comes from discharging hostility forcefully but non-
injuriously and -- with the reward of praise, not the usual blame.
Subsequent sessions followed at weekly intervals until (when
it was available) an LSD session was given, or later with the
Ritalin until Ritalin and carbogen or the presenting problem had
been alleviated. The timing of these sessions was important, not
only because periods of integration were needed following the
rapid changes brought about through drug sessions, but also
because some of the more important effects of drug sessions,
especially with LSD, can occur as long as six weeks to three
months after the sessions.
The second session could be a Ritalin-talk session, either
alone or with someone with whom the patient was in relationship
but where barriers were so high that the patient needed help in
lowering them enough to see and feel the situation more clearly.
There were also sessions with Ritalin when our trained body
workers used deep massage to remove blocks or traumatic events of
the past. The removal of psychological difficulties by means of
deep work on the body is a remarkable phenomenon.
Wilhelm Reich's theory that the character defenses are set
into the musculature of the body seems very pertinent here, and we
found later that rolfing, the technique developed by Dr. Ida P.
Rolf, could effect change in patients even without drugs, provided
the rolfers were specially trained and skilled. Body work was
found to be so effective that it was incorporated into almost all
sessions, and was particularly beneficial when used with ketamine,
the drug which Dr. Katz and I researched for therapeutic use after
injectable Ritalin was withdrawn from the market by Ciba. But we
shall discuss ketamine later.
Two techniques should be mentioned before we leave our survey
of sessions available to remove barriers and to effect deep
psychological change: the use of Ritalin with carbogen (70% oxygen
and 30% carbon dioxide, the technique most associated with Dr.
Meduna); and the injection of intravenous Ritalin into a patient
experiencing an LSD session.
Carbon dioxide inhalation was used as early as 1929 with
schizophrenics, but it was Dr. J. L. Meduna who in 1947 first
employed it with neurotics, using the 70/30 mixture. The fact
that it was much more effective when used in combination with
intravenous injections of Ritalin was first brought to our
attention by Dr. Lee Sannella of San Francisco, who taught Dr.
Katz and me the technique of giving from 10 to 50 mg. (usually 25
mg) before the carbogen while the patient rested quietly. After
three to ten minutes when Dr. Katz and I felt the time was right,
the patient would be fitted with the mask and progressive breaths
of gas would be inhaled, depending on what was most effective for
the particular patient.
Intravenous Ritalin and carbogen is not a pleasant
experience; the degree of unpleasantness appears to vary according
to the severity of the problem being worked through. Most
patients, contrary to their attitude toward Ritalin alone,
approached the gas with loathing and revulsion: if there were any
claustrophobia present, any fear of suffocating or drowning, or
most important of all, any kind of fear which many patients
experienced as a "death experience". However, the Ritalin and gas
appeared to be specific for the excision of traumatic experiences.
It was as though the individual under Ritalin and inhaling the gas
went directly to an area of discomfort and abreacted it, quite
often with accompanying body movements. It was the most potent
aid we had for early traumatic experiences until we discovered
ketamine.
In contrast to the Ritalin and gas, the injection of Ritalin
during an LSD session resulted in fragmentation of the ego and
either the constellation of psychotic elements, or in about half
the cases the Ritalin precipitated what we called an integrative
experience -- that state of freedom from conflict in which the
individual feels at one with himself and his environment. The
experience can be felt anywhere along the spectrum from relaxation
to the ecstatic, and up to a full-blown mystical experience.
While there were profound differences between the two
techniques, especially with respect to patient comfort, the two,
Ritalin/carbogen and the LSD/Ritalin, did have in common the
abrupt and sometimes explosive breaching of the individual's
control system.
Our observations were that therapeutic effects can occur
without the loss of consciousness (as opposed to Meduna's
thinking): the "letting go" which characterized the breaking of a
psychological block was as often a letting go of controls as it
was a lapsing of consciousness.
Occasionally the patient remembered the sequence of images
and exactly what happened, as with the ex-Marine who "worked
through" traumatic battle experiences; often the patient would
speak loudly enough to be heard through the mask, such as the one
who maintained stoutly, "I won't shit! I won't shit!" And
sometimes a patient's body movements would give a clue as to what
was occurring -- whether a struggle to the death or the movements
of orgasm. However, we found that in many instances the events
which were being abreacted took place so early in life that there
was no memory or verbalization available to communicate their
meaning. There often were no body movements -- or only
unintelligible ones.
The sessions were remarkably effective, even though we didn't
know the what, the why, or the mechanisms of whatever was
occurring. However, patients reported experiencing a fear of
dying which might not have been associated with anything in their
past. The facing of this fear, as well as the "death experience"
itself was undoubtedly responsible for a good deal of the
therapeutic action of the Ritalin/gas. When one has survived
suffocation, possible loss of consciousness and the feeling of
dying, not only is there the relief of surviving these very
frightening experiences, but there is also the positive aspect of
courage and fortitude which has been added to one's self concept.
Certainly, the patients in long-term therapy became very stoical
about the Ritalin/gas sessions; they recognized it as very
unpleasant but effective and they also learned how much better
they felt afterwards and how the sessions effected permanent
change, especially when abreaction occurred.
But we have gone far afield from the story of the history of
our early years with LSD. Perhaps we should go back and remember
some of the international meetings of those of us who worked with
LSD in a therapeutic setting.
The 1959 conference on "The Use of LSD in Psychotherapy" of
those of us working with LSD as a therapeutic aid took place under
the auspices of the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation with financial aid
from Sandoz, the manufacturer of LSD. Dr. Harold Abramson, one of
the earliest researchers with LSD and famous for his LSDed Siamese
Fighting Fish, was the midwife (and Editor) and Dr. Paul Hoch from
Columbia, also a very early researcher with mescaline, LSD and
other drugs, was the Chairman. Dr. Frank Freemont-Smith, Medical
Director of the Macy Foundation, did the MC honors.
There were twenty-six of us primadonnas (it's the best word I
can think of) who met at Princeton April 22, 23, 24, 1959. The
weather was beautiful, the setting was ideal, and there were 26
different ways of looking at psychotherapy as well as LSD:
twenty-six different areas of expertise and experience, and 26
opinions on the drug. These ranged from the hypothesis of
"sensory poisoning" of Dr. West through the old experimental
viewpoint of the necessity for all kinds of studies of patient,
drug and therapist, to those of us who felt LSD was the most
hopeful aid to psychotherapy that had appeared to date.
Those of us who had had spectacular success with patients
marched in the camp of Ron Sandison who had been getting favorable
results with more kinds of patients longer than any of us. Mort
Hartman and Arthur (W.) Chandler from Beverly Hills had learned
from Sid and me, and had done far more wild experimenting than we
had thought of. Keith Ditman from UCLA had replicated Humphry's
and Abram Hoffer's work where Skid Row alcoholics turned dry under
one high dose LSD, no-therapy session, and 50% were dry one year
later (alas, Humphry was in England, but Abram was there). T.T.
Peck from Texas and Robert Murphy of Pennsylvania had even given
LSD to young children (T.T. Peck also had a series of pregnant
women who had benefited from it). They were on our side of the
table. Hy Denber had read Ron Sandison's work and had seen ours;
he had worked with mescaline himself, and he could agree with the
therapy camp. Cornelius van Rhijn had come from Holland to tell
of his dark room experiments and his complicated theories about
the unconscious. Gregory Bateson, ex-husband of Margaret Meade
and anthropologist in his own right, saw things differently, as
might be expected. Charles Savage kept using that bright mind of
his to insist on definitions and agreement on psychoanalytic
concepts. And Louis J.(Joly) West, later to cause the demise of
an elephant from LSD while he was at the U. of Oklahoma and later
who was for twenty years head of NPI at UCLA (interested in
substance abuse and violence), but who hadn't been working with
LSD at that time and kept wanting to "pin things down". Dr. Frank
Fremont-Smith had a time with all of us. Certain chosen
researchers gave papers, after which there was to be "Group
Interchange" but no one got out more than two paragraphs before
the group was interchanging only too freely.
Dr. Cerletti, in his opening remarks of the Proceedings,
spoke about "the mysterious Aztec drug, the so-called ololiuqui...
one of the first specific hallucinogens, mescaline, which like
ololiuqui had its roots deep in pre-Columbian cultures of
America"; about Hofmann's 1943 discovery of LSD, which "is not of
natural origin" but of "semi-synthetic origin, since its main
molecule is the product of a fungus growing as ergot of rye."
Then the newest hallucinogen, from the "sacred mushrooms", whose
active ingredient was also found by Dr. Hofmann, interestingly
enough, and also noteworthy is the fact that psilocybin and
lysergic acid are "the first examples of naturally occurring
indoles with substitution in position 4 of the ring. This fact
links up psilocybin very nicely with LSD, whereas the mushroom
known to botanists as Psilocybe... comes in other respects in close
connection with peyotl, the Aztec source of mescaline." It was
also Albert Hofmann who made ololiuqui release its secret of
structure from seeds that were collected by Gordon Wasson, the
"discoverer" of the magic mushroom. It was surprising to find
here also an indole ring: "amide derivatives of lysergic acid
could be extracted from the ololiuqui" (the main two alkaloids are
lysergic acid amide and isolysergic acid amide). "For the general
consideration of our survey on specific hallucinogens it is
noteworthy," Dr. Cerletti pointed out, "that the basic chemical
structure of the most potent agent, LSD, which itself is not of
natural origin has been found in one of the oldest natural drugs
used for hallucinogenic purposes."
The prepared addresses were "Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy
with LSD" by Harold Abramson, "The Nature of the Psychological
Respose to LSD" by Ron Sandison, "Symbolysis: Psychotherapy by
Symbolic Presentation" by Cornelius van Rhijn, and "The Study of
Communication Processes Under LSD" by Henry Lennard and Mollie
Hewitt. A verbatim report was made of the Conference, which
fulfilled Dr. Freemont-Smith's initial hope that there would be
"informal give-and-take, in which people really communicate with
one another...where we can hope to have...a conversation, a
conversation en groupe" but at times there were serious problems
of communication, especially didactic point- making rather than
two-way flow.
In spite of all this, the exchange of information was
amazing, if one could just extract the pearl of knowledge from the
underbrush of verbiage and follow its luster into a new realm of
experience. When each of the participants spoke of his or her own
work with patients, procedure, process, occurrences and outcome,
it was fascinating. When theoretical postulates were debated, it
was usually dry and dull. But the accumulated experience of the
26 of us provided a wide spectrum of the use of LSD to aid and
abet the alleviation and removal of psychological difficulties.
Dr Savage, in a statement made when he had to leave the
Conference early said:
"This meeting is most valuable because it allows us to see
all at once results ranging from the nihilistic conclusions of
some to the evangelical ones of others. Because the results are
so much influenced by the personality, aims, and expectations of
the therapist, and by the setting, only such a meeting as this
could provide us with such a variety of personalities and
settings. We still lack adequate controlled studies, but I think
that these studies may not be long in coming..."
"It seems clear, first of all, that where there is no
therapeutic intent, there is no therapeutic result..."
"I think we can also say that where the atmosphere is fear-
ridden and skeptical, the results are generally not good.
Finally, with some patients such as chronic schizophrenics, the
LSD experience seems of no use, no matter how therapeutic the
setting."
"This is all of tremendous significance, for few drugs are so
dependent on the milieu and require such careful attention to it
as LSD does. This is not to discount the influence of the drug,
but to show how greatly the reaction is shaped by the setting."
He summed up his feelings:
"What I consider more important is the therapeutic effect of
LSD itself. By that I mean the use of LSD in a therapeutic
setting...with no active psychotherapeutic intervention. It seems
to me that here LSD may be of the greatest value...(enabling) The
more accurate perception and reconstruction of the past...the more
accurate perception of the self...But such new self-perceptions are
of little value, leading only to depression, unless they are
accompanied by a constructive experience, whether we call it
transcendental or spiritual rebirth."
This mention of the transcendental was a theme which ran
through the Conference, but was unintelligible to those
individuals who had not seen it happen with their patients, or who
had not experienced it themselves.
"One very exciting thing about LSD," I said toward the end of
the Conference (according to the record), "probably the most
exciting part, is that it brings the transcendental into
psychiatry. I mean this very deeply. It brings together two
disparate things, or two things which have perhaps been too far
apart in present-day man: the material and the spiritual. I think
one must deal with both to have healing."
A subject that was dear to my heart, and which I had
constantly discussed with Humphry, Tom Powers, and even argued
with Sid Cohen.
******
There were local seminars and papers, and in December of 1960
I discussed our LSD work at the California State Psychological
Association. But the next really big adventure for me was
appearing before the Royal Medico-Psychological Association in
London. This was arranged by Ron Sandison, of course, and I felt
very proud and excited to be included in the "Proceedings" of
their Quarterly Meeting in February of 1961 on "Hallucinogenic
Drugs and Their Psychotherapeutic Use". It was interesting that
this was the 120th Anniversary of the founding of the Association,
and Dr. Alexander Walk, the chairman, mentioned that among the
very earliest papers given at one of the meetings were several
concerned with the effects of drugs on mental states.
Most of the participants came from England -- I felt doubly
honored to be in the company of those from abroad: Willi
Arendsen-Hein and Cornelius van Rhijn from Holland, Hans-Karl
Leuner from Germany, Jean Delay and Mlle. T. Lemperiere from
France, and Dr. Cerletti from Sandoz in Switzerland. As to the
English participants, it was such a pleasure to see Ron Sandison
again as well as Tom Ling and Joyce Martin, and to meet Francis
Huxley and J. R. Smythies -- whom Humphry had spoken about -- as
well as all of the other experts. It was also a special pleasure
to meet Dr. Spencer, from Powick, and to be able to discuss his
exciting LSD group work, whose setting I had seen on my first
visit to Powick.
The way the Proceedings were arranged was to have a series of
three or four papers on a topic such as the Historical and Psycho-
Pharmacological Background (first session), and then to have the
papers discussed by two of the participants. The second session,
Hallucinogenic Agents and their General Application, began with
Ron's "Certainty and Uncertainty in the LSD Treatment of
Psychoneurosis", followed by a paper on Psilocybin by Dr. Delay
and one on Phencyclidine in Psychiatry by Dr. R.M. Davies from
Bethlehem Royal and Maudsley. I wish I had realized that this was
a golden opportunity to learn about ketamine, but, alas, our
knowledge of that fascinating drug was to be delayed another 13
years until we heard about it from Mexico and Iran (!)
The third session, "Techniques and Methodology" was
illuminated by Dr. Spencer speaking about his group therapy and
Hans-Karl Leuner's paper on 64 patients on whom LSD, psilocybin
and mescaline were used. There was also a paper on "Abreaction
and Brainwashing" and one on the techniques of Phencyclidine. The
fourth session was on "The Use of Hallucinogens in Specific
Conditions": depersonalization, criminal psychopaths (Willi
Arendsen-Hein), adolescent boys, and a case of a psychopathic
personality and homosexuality (treated by LSD) given by Joyce
Martin.
My paper, "The Influence of LSD on Unconscious Activity", was
the last one in the fifth session of "Clinical Observations and
Phenomenological Interpretation" -- ("Any resemblance between this
paper and its title is, I am afraid, purely coincidental," I told
them, since Ron gave me the title after the paper was almost
finished.) But I did "cover the water front" as I shall report
shortly.
February 9, 1961 letter to Humphry:
"Finally have a first draft of my London paper -- not good
but I hope to improve it. Ron Sandison asked me to tell the 150
British psychiatrists all I know of LSD in simple language and
under 2,000 words. Title 'Effect of LSD on Unconscious Activity.'
I give up, but he assured me my 'charm' would carry me through.
How do you like that? It should be fun, though and will be
wonderful to see him."
The sixth session was a group of four lay people, members of
the media mostly, on "The Moral, Religious and Social Significance
of Experience Under Hallucinogenic Drugs" -- mostly discussions of
how taking psychedelics had changed the authors' lives.
And now, some quotations from my paper:
"Probably the most fascinating aspect of close association
with psycholytic drugs, and particularly LSD, is the almost
miraculous way in which human dynamics are laid bare and levels of
consciousness become available to scrutiny."
"LSD and related agents appear to be research tools far
beyond present-day conception -- even the conception of those of
us who have been working with them for years. Controlled journeys
are made possible into the psyche: into the individual or personal
unconscious; into the racial and collective unconscious; even into
cosmic levels. This is possible through manipulation of the
environment, the dosage, and the condition of the patient..."
"It further seems apparent that LSD, when properly used,
contains a great potential for the treatment of mental illnesses
which may not be amenable to conventional methods. It appears to
work specifically on the two essentials for true healing: the
handling of problem areas; and the potentiating of the integrative
experience whereby the individual feels himself at one with his
environment."
"There has been continual if not unanimous observation that
the therapeutic setting may be the optimal situation for research
into the layers of human dynamics and of the many levels of
consciousness. We are fortunate to be the explorers of inner
space and the first voyagers who can make planned and often
predictable trips into areas where time and space seem to have no
bearing..."
"There are also unusual, little-known areas which have
emerged with sufficient frequency as to appear just as real in the
infinity of the psyche as Hawaii is in the vastness of the Pacific
Ocean, and Venus in the sweep of the heavens. These 'places', if
one may so define them, seem to be perceived by patients as though
existing in space -- and in relatively similar positions. This
is, paradoxically, despite the fact that when any moment is felt
totally under any of these drugs the experience appears to
transcend time and space. We have, for the sake of communication,
and with temerity and perhaps some levity, assigned names to some
of the most frequently-appearing places: Cosmic Rejection or
Limbo; Chaos; the Black or Schizophrenic Belt; the Desert; the Ice
Country. In addition to these are the two which have occupied
man's attention since the birth of self-consciousness: Heaven and
Hell."
"The secret of experiencing these 'places' creatively seems
to be the patient's total acceptance of their 'reality' and one's
presence there as fully as though for 'eternity' if necessary. In
fact, one of the techniques for maintaining a deep psychic level
of drug operation is to have the individual 'move' toward that
which appears repulsive, painful, or frightening, and to continue
the experience as long as it is." (Resolution, transcendence)
"In the course of five years of work with the psycholytic or
mind-changing drugs -- LSD, mescaline, psilocybin, Ritalin, and
the amphetamines -- one can only be awestruck by the genius of
Freud, Adler, and Jung -- and be saddened at the forces which
split apart this trinity..."
"Freud is recognized as the cartographer of the personal
unconscious, although if one reads him carefully it is apparent
that he recognized the racial and perhaps the collective
unconscious in his use of the terms archaic mind and biological
heritage. Adler saw the vast importance of the siblings: our
observation is that as often as not the triangle of relationship,
which Freud too narrowly named oedipal, is worked out through the
siblings either totally or supplementarily to that of the
parental. Jung perceived the importance of racial inheritance,
the collective unconscious -- and most importantly to me, the
cosmic levels of consciousness and man's need to turn toward them
at least by mid-life..."
(Then I described our therapeutic methods)
"The main process is the allowance of the patient's
unconscious to reveal itself in its own sequence. Direct
interpretations -- used at appropriate points to clarify and to
slice away misperceptions -- have been found effective in taking
the patient deeper into the drug experience. Recently we have
been experimenting -- successfully, we believe -- with non-verbal
techniques: physical contact for anxious or fearful patients; the
presence of both male and female therapist even if one or both
seldom speak; hostility discharge by throwing clay or by beating
cardboard boxes; reduction of inhibitions and extension of
emotional range through feeling difference textures and materials
-- to 'feel' tactilely seems closely related to 'feel'
emotionally; the presence of additional individuals personally
familiar with LSD in difficult cases -- this technique in addition
to but distinct from group therapy where all individuals except,
or course, the therapist are under a low dose of LSD; and physical
containment -- to break certain refractory defense patterns, for
example at the extreme, passive resistance to the point of
suicide."
"There are other experimental but efficacious techniques
which are little understood and as yet not named or categorized.
One of these is eye-to-eye non-verbal communication. This may
sound strange; it is strange how well it works."
"It is becoming increasingly clear that a large part of the
interaction between doctor and patient takes place at a non-verbal
level. This is disconcerting in our highly-rational, over-
intellectualized society where semantics seem to act as the cement
of human relationship. However, much better results are observed
to occur when the wisdom of the deep unconscious is allowed to
take over -- with the therapist acting more as guide and
interpreter."
"In the course of our therapeutic work, a number of startling
phenomena have been observed. We may have a milieu in which such
little-understood phenomena as ESP, `sensitives', laying on of the
hands, so-called faith healing, hypnosis, and other uncharted
border-line states of consciousness may be systematically
examined. In this, as in all research, it is imperative to keep
an open mind -- to be willing to look at any data which emerge --
no matter how contrary to traditional beliefs."
The only phenomenon which occurred often that I didn't
mention because I didn't dare: past lives. Not only we, but
everyone else with whom I communicated were getting so much data
on what appeared to be past lives. But that is an entirely
different story, and one which belongs, primarily, to Dr. Ian
Stevenson who has spent a life-time demonstrating the occurrence
of such phenomena with 3,000 verified case histories, mostly of
children, from all over the world.
The effect of my paper was a little strange -- it was as if
they didn't quite know what to do with it or with me. Dr. Frank
Lake from Nottingham said,
"We shall not have the proper language until we become
familiar with the work of the existentialists. And then again
we've had Dr. Betty Eisner's jeux d'esprit, lifting us up to her
own happy empyrean height. One thing is quite certain -- that if
people have anything to do with LSD in therapy they seem to enjoy
the experience; perhaps we shouldn't, but I think we do. There is
sometimes thought to be a scientific virtue in not enjoying
things."
Hear! Hear! and Tut! Tut!
Why shouldn't a scientist enjoy his/her work?
(I report on the meetings to Humphry in a letter dated April 12)
"Incidentally, at the London meetings, it was decided
(informally) to call the drugs psycholytics following a long
thrashing out of the problem at Gottingen last November. Have you
heard from anyone about the APT, the Association of Psycholytic
Therapists? Ron is the new president, Cornellius van Rhijn VP,
Hans Leuner from Germany something (maybe I have these mixed up).
Anyway, it came into being the weekend after the meetings when we
all went up to visit Ron in Powick. Anderson of Copenhagen was
there, too, and also Arendsen-Hein of Holland. We had a wonderful
time seeing LSD at the hospital; also we are very fond of the
Sandisons and enjoyed so much seeing the boys and Evelyn as well
as any moment that we can see Ron. I almost didn't make it as one
of the `founding fathers' of the APT (I'm not sure who they all
are: just know in the US they are Hy Denber, Joel Elkes, Sid, and
me). For a long time there was quite a fight about me because I
am a PhD. I wasn't in on this, but Will was, said a few pertinent
things, and then left the meeting. The next day three of them
tried to get me to go back to medical school and get an M.D. (to
which I replied I was too old and would be more valuable spending
the time in research then in repeating schooling). When Dr.
Anderson of Copenhagen found it would take me at least six years,
he immediately saw the senselessness of it. The others, I'm not
sure, ever did. It does get discouraging to run into the
prejudice which judges more from the initials after one's name (or
one's sex, because I'm afraid this had some bearing, too) then by
what the individual is and can do. At times I get tired of
carrying the torch and fighting the battle..."
"The meetings were really wonderful. Best of all was to be
with a group of people who were doing what I was, were intensely
interested, and to whom I wasn't a nut. There are a group of
young people -- those who are getting together in the APT -- who
are very active and enthusiastic about LSD. I think I mentioned
most of their names in the earlier part of the letter I had
started...Incidentally, I met Dr. Spencer, the head of the hospital
at Powick, and he is one of the sweetest and finest men I have
ever met. Do you know him? He offered me a job at Powick, and if
it weren't for the family, by golly, I would take it in a minute.
What a wonderful thing it would be to be able to work in an
atmosphere where it was considered normal to give LSD rather than
abnormal..."
(Report on group; discussion about Al and DMT, and schizophrenic
gene)
"As for me, I can't figure myself out. I seem to be a sport;
I don't have the schizophrenic gene, although LSD changed my life
and enabled me to do these things which the gene usually allows.
I think I'm just a queer duck who immediately brings up any latent
problem in people merely by being (and when I start operating
therapeutically, even more so). So that when patients come to me,
those who have a necessity to go all the way are constellated
around me. Maybe just as I said, Cosmic Crud Cleaner -- just
another name for therapist. The Cosmic doesn't mean that I clean
up cosmic crud, just that I have to do it on a cosmic scale..."
My slight depression about my difficulties of degree and sex
with respect to my work had elements of premonition about the
difficulties I would encounter when I arrived home. But let's
deal with the next Conference first.
On April 19, 1962, I was part of a symposium at the Western
Psychological Association in San Francisco. I don't remember
whether the whole symposium was on Ritalin, but I know that my
paper was. It seems to me that later on, there was another
symposium, this time in Los Angeles, on Ritalin. Virginia
Johnson, who had researched Ritalin in a most fascinating way, was
chairman. I can't remember the other participants. But it was
all very interesting.
"The Mind and Its Capabilities" was the title of an
Interdepartmental Seminar held on October 7 (1963) at the RAND
Corp. in Santa Monica. "Talks were delivered by four researchers
into matters of the mind," reported the Random News.
"All speakers seemed to agree on a few basic points: that
work on the mind is indeed exciting -- if frustrating. It may
rival, perhaps even surpass, Space as the next frontier for a
breakthrough in knowledge... And the study of the mind is in the
process of changing from an art to a science..."
(The seminar itself seemed to present bits of each.)
"In line with a not unfamiliar pattern, one speaker noted
that the Soviets have more than three hundred people engaged in
research in parapsychology, and about the same number in research
on mind-affecting drugs, whereas the U.S. has very few researchers
in these two 'way-out' fields..."
"The suggestion of a developing dichotomy seemed to hover
over the discussion in approaches to mind research... Thus,
biochemical-model-oriented Dr. Denber and experimental
psychologist Dr. Gengerelli appeared to be pressing mind research
along one pattern; Dr. Osmond, with his interest in exploring the
ionosphere, appears to set a course in a different direction; Dr.
Cohen and his interest in mind-controlling drugs falls somewhere
in between..."
From my letter to Humphry of August 12, 1963:
"...official notice. That should be to you in this mail or
even earlier. It has gone out from RAND from W.M., a member of my
group. It is going to be a very impressive seminar: Hy Denber
will talk on the mind (you know besides being a psychiatrist,
psychoanalyst and head of clinical research at Ward's Island, he
has just gotten his MS in molecular biology in order better to
understand what goes on in schizophrenia at the cellular level.)
Sid has been invited to speak on the mind in unusual states such
as psychosis, especially toxic, LSD, etc; and Gengerelli, one of
the most brilliant experimental minds (who is at UCLA) will handle
the experimental end. He is a rare combination of a magnificent
computer, experimentally, a clinician at heart (which he won't
admit) and an open mind which enables him to talk to sensitives I
bring over to him and also to have done research on comparative
palm prints). He found a statistically significant difference
between those of schizophrenics and Kiwanis Club members. Not
astounding, I know, but the Kiwanis Club followed the trend of the
normals, and the schizies were specific to mental illness, as I
remember. He has never published this, and you can guess why. If
all goes well, and he is willing, Aldous Huxley will introduce you
or say some sort of initial words, I hope..."
And from September 15, 1963 letter to Hy Denber from me:
"...Humphry can't come, alas. So it will be you leading off,
then Sid Cohen on Unusual States of the Mind, then Bob Lynch
(Menninger-trained psychiatrist who has worked with LSD, whose
specialty is creativity, and who practices in La Jolla) will read
whatever remarks Humphry puts together on Potentialities of the
Mind (creativity, ESP, whatever) and then Gengerelli, an
experimental psychologist at UCLA...and a very funny and sometimes
lewd man, will talk about Difficulties in Research with the Mind..."
And from a letter to Hy of October 28, 1963, after the Seminar:
"...The back-wash of the seminar seems very favorable, and
there will be an article about it in the next Random news. We are
on the trail of several possibilities and will let you know as
soon as we sock one in..."
November 2l, 1963
Dearest Humphry:
"At last! At long last!! I-"
December 15: "...I was just getting ready to write when the
double blow of President Kennedy and Aldous hit. I don't think
that I have yet recovered from Aldous' death; I was able finally
to write to Laura last night. However, I had talked to her just
the week before, and we had made a tentative date for the week
following, providing he felt stronger. I knew that he was
seriously ill from other sources, but was lulled into a false
security by talking to her. What I mean is that it came as a
double shock. Not only have we lost an extraordinary human being,
one totally clear in one aspect of humanity, but also one of the
most kindly men I have ever known. Plus the fact that he was the
champion of anyone on the forefront of research and particularly
those of us working with LSD. With all of the bad publicity about
LSD I feel that we are sorely pressed (I was kicked out of my
hospital for the fourth time on Friday, but I did manage to give
the particular patient a session); I feel that with Aldous gone I
have lost a shield and a protector. As well as a friend and
wonderful father figure..."
"But life goes on and one must manage; must take on the front
ranks of the battle even though not feeling ready or able..."
"There is so much to tell you...First about the seminar. It
was good, but in many ways a disappointment. The RAND people
expected something tight and with real meat, just as they are
forced to give in their briefings. Alas, as the chairman pointed
out, study of the mind is more of an art than a science. We had a
bad blow in that he was very favorable to us and to moving into
research in the area, and he is leaving to take an important job
with the government. And the other best bet is ill with diabetes
and doesn't yet have the energy to consider and shepherd a project
about ESP through the channels...Actually, the research through my
practice is incredible, and L.K. and W.M. sit through many of my
Ritalin sessions. Have I told you that I am getting 75 and 100
gamma LSD effects with 15 and 20 mg. of IM Ritalin?"
"We are also going ahead on the ESP research, after many or
rather a few consultations with Gengerelli...We did a batch of ESP
experiments on Saturday...and found that we could send non-verbal
messages for movement of body parts, just as the Russians have
reported under hypnosis. This was under a very low dose of LSD.
But there is something operating here that no one has hit...I think
it is a new form of energy, and probably one which occurs just
past the speed of light, so that we actually would experience it
as simultaneity..."
"...as an aside, we are getting so much on what we call load
carrying -- which actually is the explanation, mostly, of
psychogenic illness or at least a large part of them..."
"It is getting on toward the holiday season, so the most
MERRY OF NOELS, and HAPPY, HAPPY COMING YEAR, AND MOST OF ALL
LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, AND HURRY OUT. Betty"
The Rand seminar was a small one, although very interesting.
But the next one -- an international conference in London -- was
not only huge, but fascinating: The First International Congress
of Social Psychiatry August 17 to 22, 1964. It was a most
exciting one for me -- with W.M. and L.K., two members of the
research group, there with me, and also Dr. Ernest Katz, who had
begun to do Ritalin and carbogen with us. And that conference was
when we met Stanislov Grof, among others. There was also much
opportunity to meet with researchers from all over the world and
also to see the sights of London with them.
Letter of August 30, 1963 from Dr. John Buckman:
"You may have already been informed that, on the initiation
of the International Journal of Social Psychiatry, the First
International Congress of Social Psychiatry is being convened in
London, 17th to 22nd August, 1964. The response so far has been
an overwhelming one."
"The problem of drug treatment in psychiatry is part of the
programme. It is my task to contact workers in the field of
hallucinogens, especially L.S.D., who would like to attend the
Conference..."
"I have during the past three years been in touch with some
workers in this field, and the International Congress next year
might be a good opportunity for all psychiatrists to discuss the
problems not just of L.S.D. or other drug treatment, but the whole
concept of evolving effective and short methods of psychotherapy..."
"Dr. Joshua Bierer and all of us on the Organizing Committee
would like to have as soon as possible a reply from all interested
who propose to attend..."
"With kind regards, Yours sincerely, Dr. John Buckman"
52 Welbeck St., London, Wl 30/3/64
Dear Dr. Betty Eisner,
"You may remember me at the Congress of Hallucinogenic Drugs
three years ago in London, when I met you and your husband, and we
had our interesting talk on LSD. I believe you are also coming
this year in August to the First International Congress of Social
Psychiatry, and I hope you have contributed a paper on `LSD'. I
expect you have already booked your hotel, but if you wished to
stay with me for a few days, I would be delighted to put up you
and your husband."
"I have been going ahead with `LSD' and have had some most
rewarding results by using a combination of the direct or
behaviorist approach in breaking down old frustrations and
establishing new positive responses, and later giving
interpretations and developing insights. We develop the new
responses by direct gratification of their needs at an oral level
by giving warm milk from the bottle, and supporting them
physically, but not at the later levels of development when it
might make the transference too difficult."
"I am planning to come to New York on May 6th and staying
there ten days, and then coming to California for a few days. I
want to see the LSD unit at Stanford University. Do you know
anyone working there? Would there be any chance of seeing you and
having a chat? I should so much like to."
"Very best wishes, Yours Sincerely, Joyce Martin"
March 5, 1964
Dear Joyce:
"I was delighted to have your letter of March 30th and to
know that you will be in the States, not only in New York but also
in California..."
"I assume that you mean the clinic in Menlo Park (on Advanced
Humanity or some other such name). I do indeed know people
working there; I know the man who founded it (Al Hubbard)...and I
know Dr. Charles Savage, the MD head of the clinic. I could send
letters for you up there or call for you if you would like..."
"I would like to have you for the weekend with me...I want you
to meet my research group; we meet every Friday from 5 on, and I
think you will enjoy them. They are the ones who work with me
with group drug sessions..."
"There is something which you can do for me which is very
crucial...On August 30th Dr. John Buckman wrote to me, asking me to
be a participant in the Conference. On September 14th I replied
to him, stating that I would like to be part of a seminar on LSD
and other hallucinogenic drugs. On September 2nd you wrote to me
asking me to contribute to the session on LSD and drug therapy. I
replied on September 10th... Unfortunately, to date I have not
heard from either of you as to what my role in the Conference
would be. I have a paper on Ritalin, LSD and mescaline which I
could give, but I would prefer to be part of a symposium or
something like that. Would you PLEASE do me a favor and find out
what I am to do, if anything. Otherwise I don't see any reason
for coming. Best wishes to you, Betty Grover Eisner"
52 Welbeck St., London Wl 12/4/64
Dear Betty:
"Thank you very much for your letter and your invitation to
come down on May 15th and meet your group and stay the weekend.
It is terribly sweet of you, and I would love to do so if I can
get a plane OK..."
"Please accept apologies regarding your letters to John
Buckman and myself which we have never received due to rush on the
Congress Secretary, who apparently has not dealt with it. The Dr.
in charge of our Section is Dr. Frisch, but he also had not
received either of your letters, so I asked him to write to you
apologizing, and saying we would very much like to have your paper
on "Ritalin, LSD and Mescaline". All the papers are being
circulated for the members of the group previous to the Meetings,
so that we can meet as a seminar, knowing the papers the members
have written, so do send your paper as soon as possible to Dr.
Frisch..."
April 29, 1964
Dear Joyce:
"I am overwhelmed that I have been so long in answering your
letter. On the way to the office the day I received it, I was in
an auto accident (a young boy dropped a cigarette and turned his
car into ours while bending to retrieve it), and I have had to
have whiplash treatments, dentist for the split tooth, X-rays for
the fractured cheek, etc..."
"Enclosed are letters to Charles Savage and Myron Stolaroff.
I didn't know whether you would want to take the letters with you
or mail them ahead, so have sent them on to you...I don't think that
there is any LSD work being done at Stanford; however, Dr. Leo
Hollister at the Palo Alto VA has done a bit of work on all of the
hallucinogenic drugs."
"Dr. Mort Hartman is practicing in New York City now, and I
understand he isn't using drugs at all. You might get in touch
with him when you are there..."
"Thank you for speaking to Dr. Frisch about my paper...Really
looking forward to seeing you. Let me know when and where you
arrive. Best regards, Betty"
52 Welbeck St., London, Wl (postmarked: June 11, 1964)
After her visit to Los Angeles and San Francisco:
Dear Betty,
"I was delighted to get your letter...I must say I have
retained a very warm feeling towards the group still and feel sort
of lost without them?! and yet I feel they are still there and its
nice to belong. You certainly have got something in that group
most valuable, and I shall look forward tremendously to having
further talk about it."
"I do hope you have persuaded W.M. and L.K. to come to the
Conference, tell them I shall be delighted to put them up here if
they don't mind sharing my large attic room, or if Dr. and Mrs.
Andersen from Copenhagen do not come they could have the other
guest room. I will also offer Dr. Trabulus a bed in the
consulting room if he wishes to have one. I was so pleased to
hear you had invited him to your dinner group. I am sure he
enjoyed it immensely."
"Regarding the Proceedings of our Conference, the only fixed
date we know at the moment is Thursday, August 20th for the
Reception Dinner..."
"I was so sorry to hear about your husband's operation. I do
hope all is well now...Greetings to all from Joyce"
June 11, 1964
Dear Joyce:
"I am a week late. Last week I was up in Palo Alto with
Will. He was operated on for a tumor -- lung cancer. He has
irradiation this week and next. If it doesn't work, the prognosis
is not good. Please don't talk about this; he doesn't want people
to know."
"On Monday a car two cars back at a stop light rammed the car
in back of me which hit me. Another whip lash and more damage to
the car. There seem to be destructive forces abroad."
"Keep your fingers crossed that I will make it to the
Conference. Love, Betty"
"Despite all this, I have finished the paper...I probably will
have no reputation and be considered crazy after this one, but I
put in it all that I know and have found out -- covered it all
briefly..."
"Keep your fingers crossed that I will make it to the
Congress. Love, Betty"
52 Welbeck St., London, Wl 9/8/64
Dear Betty:
"Just a line to say I wonder if you would be willing to
report on Dr. Leary's paper, "A New Behavior Change Program using
psilocybin" which describes the change brought about in a small
group of criminals treated with psilocybin 2 - 3 times + group
discussions, and I think you might have a lot in common with his
method, and if you could collect the paper from me on Saturday or
Sunday, you could read it in 1/2 hour and decide if you would like
to report on it. Dr. Leary himself and his colleagues are not
coming to the Congress but have submitted this paper, which I
think very good and important. I do not want to report on it
myself as it is so different from my method but more in common
with yours...Best wishes and love from Joyce"
I don't remember whether I reported on Tim Leary's paper or
not; it might have been not because he and Richard Alpert were
making a lot of noise/trouble, and one of the times he had been in
Los Angeles, I had felt a change in him and been upset.1
But I do remember what a wonderful time we all had at the
Conference. Somewhere there is a picture of all of us after we
had been out for a Chinese dinner, and we are all grinning like
Cheshire cats.
My paper was called "Psychedelics and People as Adjuncts to
Psychotherapy." It might be interesting to quote from parts of
it:
"In the search for biochemical means to facilitate
psychotherapy, a number of drugs have been used singly and in
various combinations: psychedelics such as mescaline, peyote, DMT
(di-methyl tryptamine), ibogaine, ololiuqui, psilocybin, and LSD-
1 December 15, 1962 letter to Humphry: "Tim Leary was out for a weekend
of lectures and workshops -- he and Richard Alpert, and it was fun to see them.
Virginia Denison had a gathering of people interested in drug work -- Aldous
Huxley came after his participation in a Conference on peace, I think it was, in
Santa Barbara. He certainly is a wonderful person. There seems to be quite a
movement developing around Tim and Dick for personal research in expanding of
consciousness. You probably have heard about their place they rent in Mexico in
the summers. There was something that bothered me about the whole thing -- some
sort of separateness or rather a special sort of language which seems to be
developing. I wonder why so much of the drug work has led to fractionation
rather than fusion. There is much to-do over here in the wake of banning of LSD
for clinical work in the US and Canada...The Undergraduate Dean at Harvard has
been making front-page-hitting headlines about 'mind distorting drugs'. There
has been such a swing behind the conservatives that it is disappointing..."
25, and stimulants such as the amphetamines and Ritalin.
Colleagues have reported on the use of the above drugs as well as
others such as meretran, ditran, CO2, and nitrous oxide in various
combinations. Over the past twelve years of research, LSD has
been found to be the most effective pharmacological aid in
consistently lowering ego defensiveness, enhancing rapport, and
making unconscious material available..."
"Almost as important, intramuscular Ritalin was found to be
an excellent substitute for the low-dose LSD treatments which had
been used to lower defensive barriers in building toward a high-
dose session..."
"In our observation, psychedelics form a spectrum
qualitatively. All appear to lessen psychic controls so that
defenses are lowered and unconscious material becomes more
available. All enhance rapport and make accessible other levels
of consciousness which range from heaven to hell to the silent,
imageless mystic experience. All contribute to the plasticity of
space and the fluidity of time..."
"The qualitative differences among the psychedelics become
considerably blurred and sometimes totally obscured in the
presence of strong individual differences and unusual emotional
states. Our observation has been that the most important
determinants of strength, duration, and type of drug reactions are
the total state of the individual taking the drug, and the
situation in which the session takes place, including the people
present..."
"It is this manipulation of the environment -- particularly
of the individuals present -- which has been found to be the most
effective potentiator and direction-determiner of a drug session.
People are the best potentiators of drug action, direction, and
depth..."
"It was early observed that the presence of both a male and
female doctor deepened the drug experience and greatly speeded up
the therapeutic process. With the introduction of additional
members, often a group, to individual LSD sessions, further
acceleration was noted. The effectiveness of adding just the
'right' individuals to a drug session has been most dramatic since
the use of Ritalin..."
"While this 'people potentiation' occurs according to the
depth and extent to which the patient is ready, timing is also
important. It is most effective to introduce group members early
in the course of therapy if there are unusually strong defenses to
overcome, or even more importantly near the point of breakthrough
(usually the third or fourth Ritalin session) when the effects of
the group members are maximum..."
"...it has become increasingly clear that individuals familiar
with drug techniques who have themselves gone through the process
of drug therapy in order to overcome pathology -- and who continue
the process in the service of removal of barriers to psychotherapy
-- even more important at times than the drug itself..."
"...the advantages of LSD therapy as compared to conventional
therapy:
l. "LSD therapy is far faster than conventional
psychotherapy...it effects basic personality change which has been
intractable to conventional methods..."
2. "LSD therapy is safer than conventional psychotherapy
provided the therapist is experienced both as a clinician and with
drugs..."
3. "LSD makes available, from the very first session, other
levels of consciousness which might require months or years of
conventional therapy to effect. Rapport is greatly enhanced,
transference is speeded, and material from the past is far more
accessible."
4. "LSD therapy makes available for treatment areas not
usually subject to inspection...material from the collective
unconscious or racial heritage...genetic heritage, material which
seems to come from past lives...outer space."
5. "Perhaps the most unique aspect of LSD therapy is the
impetus and accessibility it provides for the mystic or unitive
experiences from the simplest feeling of deep empathy between two
individuals...to the magnificence of multidimensional unity."
"Finally, there is a further value of LSD in research. It is
a tool beyond parallel for uncovering the dynamics of the human
mind in a controlled fashion..."
As to the Conference itself, there were piles of papers that
were to be read before the specific session, and then there were
seminar-type discussions. My memory is not of the seminars or the
talks or who said what, but of the people -- all of us who knew
each other and then those we met at the Conference. And I can
remember standing in endless lines -- to collect papers, to get
into Conference rooms, to meet people one wanted to see.
However, the time that is etched indelibly in my memory is
one of the first days, when I was with Ernie Katz, W.M., and L.K.
We were talking about carbogen or LSD or some aspect of our drug
work.
"Pardon me," said a voice behind us. "Are you by any chance
Dr. Betty Eisner of Los Angeles?"
My mouth fell open in amazement. I turned around to see a
tall, handsome, very serious young man standing behind me. I had
never seen him before.
"You see," he continued apologetically, "I heard what you
were discussing, and I figured it must be you." And then he went
on to introduce himself: Stanislov Grof from Czechoslovakia.
I don't think I had heard of him then, but after he described
his work, we were all fascinated. It was somewhat like Ron
Sandison's and mine at the VA. (Ron, incidentally, was at the
conference but staying with his English colleagues.) When we
asked Stanya, he told us of his research, and we saw the pictures
that his patients had drawn and painted -- just like those Ron
had, and also like the patients I had done at the VA who went to
the art studio after sessions. His success rate was like ours,
too. In fact, we had met a fellow traveler of LSD therapy!
It became international old home week, and Stanya joined us
for the rest of our activities in London, and we were instrumental
in persuading him to come to the United States in order to
continue his work. The next time we were to see him was when he
came to visit us in Los Angeles the following year.
During this summer, I had been under particular pressures
because Will had been found to have a malignant tumor at the apex
of his left lung. He had been operated on while I was with him in
Palo Alto, before we left for England, and then he began a series
of radiation treatments from the Linear Accelerator. It was a
very difficult decision for me, but Will insisted that I carry out
my plans to go to the Europe, taking the children with me.
I can remember my relief in London when I received an air
letter from him saying that he was being discharged as "cured".
It was therefore a devastating shock when I was in Paris with the
children to have a call from the friend whose apartment we were
staying in and who was in our home in Santa Monica that I should
come home immediately because Will was dying. It took some time
to get a connection to Will by phone. He said that he was fine,
and that I should finish the trip with the children.
I didn't know whom to believe. Will was emphatic that he was
well; my friend was skeptical; but she also felt that we should
finish our trip. We arrived home just before Labor Day, and Will
came down to see us and to hear about the trip.
I was shattered when I saw him. My friend had been right.
Although the lung cancer was cured, it had metastasized to the
brain. In a little over four months, Will was gone. We had been
married 28 years.
*******
The last important conference for those of us who had worked
with LSD was "The Second International Conference on the Use of
LSD in Psychotherapy and Alcoholism", held at the South Oaks
Hospital in Amityville, New York. Dr. Harold Abramson was South
Oaks Research Director. At times the Conference seemed somewhat
redundant since by that time virtually all LSD for clinical work
had been withdrawn. But we were to have one last hurrah!
July 1, 1964
Dear Dr. Eisner:
"On June 12, 1964 the Planning Committee met in New York City
to decide on the details for the SECOND CONFERENCE ON THE USE OF
LSD IN PSYCHOTHERAPY..."
"The Conference will be held under the auspices of the
Foundation (South Oaks Research Foundation, Inc.)...The length of
the Conference will be two and a half days starting at 10:00 A.M.
Saturday, May 8th and lasting until noon Monday, May 10, 1965..."
"Although the organization will be somewhat similar to the
First Macy Conference, the Second Conference will differ in one
very important aspect. Participants will not present their papers
orally, but are expected to submit manuscripts in duplicate to me
on or before January l, 1965. These manuscripts will be either
mimeographed or printed and distributed to all participants one
month before the Conference begins. These PREPRINTS then will be
available for study by members of the Conference who may come in
with prepared discussions or discuss the papers spontaneously
during the Conference."
"The Planning Committee felt that the primary purpose of the
Conference had to do with psychotherapy, but that mechanisms of
action would be a most suitable supplementary topic."
"It is anticipated that the proceedings of the Conference
will be published with each submitted paper followed by its
appropriate recorded discussion. In the last Macy Conference on
LSD, members presenting papers were often unable to finish their
presentation because the discussion often went far afield. For
this reason the early distribution of the PREPRINTS will give
maximum time for discussion and assurance that each participant
will have his presentation available in full to members of the
Conference..."
"With kindest personal regards, Yours Sincerely,
H. A. Abramson, M.D. Director of Research (South Oaks Research
Foundation, Inc.)"
Since I had accepted the Conference before I knew the
seriousness of Will's illness, and the paper was mostly finished
before his death, it was felt by the research group that I should
go to the Conference, but that one of the group should go with me.
Dr. Abramson was willing to have a silent participant under the
circumstances. L.K. was not able to go, so W.M. from RAND
accompanied me. W.M. and L.K. had met many of the participants
the summer before in London where they were when I was there with
the children for the Social Psychiatry Congress.
There were fifty-five of us gathered at Amityville, New York,
almost every single therapist who had used LSD. Sandison, Ling,
Buckman, Martin and McCririck, plus others I didn't know from
England; Arendsen-Hein and van Rhijn from Holland; Leuner from
Germany; Johnsen from Norway; Grof from Czechoslovakia (which we
had happily managed); several groups from Canada plus Abram Hofer,
and Humphry, although by that time he was Head of the Bureau of
Research in Neurology and Psychiatry in New Jersey; one man from
Italy; and then besides the old guard from the US (Cohen, Ditman -
- paper, not in person, Savage, Elkes, Murphy, Rinkel, Fremont-
Smith, etc). John Lilly reported on his LSD work with dolphins,
making some of it sound just like psychotherapy; in fact, one
participant drew a parallel between dolphins and the delinquents
she works with. Walter Pahnke stunned us all with his brilliant
controlled and double-blind study on the comparison of the mystic
state under psilocybin with non-drug mystic states in men
seminarians.1 And of course, many others, too numerous to mention.
(My paper, "The Importance of the Non-Verbal", described a number
of unusual and effective techniques we had evolved in individual
and group sessions. It elicited a rousing discussion!)
The fifty-five of us produced an enormous tome of just under
seven hundred pages -- with Harold Abramson's hard work and good
editing. Actually, it is a virtual text-book on the use of LSD in
psychotherapy -- and alcoholism -- "written" by the people who
developed the methods they used. Dr. Frank Fremont-Smith, who
chaired the Conference along with Dr. Abramson, said:
"It is to be hoped that the research and clinical studies
reported in this volume will serve to bring into better
perspective the use of LSD in particular and the proper management
in general of governmental restrictions upon drug research by
qualified physicians."
Alas, at that time, none of us could obtain LSD for our work.
Leary, Alpert, et al. had wreaked havoc with legitimate, ongoing
research with their refrain of "Turn On, Tune In, and Drop Out!"
1Summary from his "The Contribution of the Psychology of Religion to the
Therapeutic Use of the Psychedelic Substances": "Data were presented to show
that psychedelic drug experience can be very similar to if not identical with
the experiences described by mystics. A nine-category typology of mystical
experience was defined and a double-blind controlled experiment was described in
which normal subjects were given psilocybin in a supportive, religiously
meaningful setting. The experiences of the experimental subjects were more like
the mystical typology than those of the controls at a significance level well
below expectation (.001 mostly)." The therapeutic implications of this kind of
psychedelic drug experience were discussed in regard to the best way to
facilitate mystical experience, the most effective means by which to aid the
work of integration, and the optimal number and frequency of sessions. The
challenging possibilities of future research in this area were suggested, and
the possible dangers mentioned.
All of this after their very interesting research with criminals
and psilocybin. But they took the drug along with their subjects,
and got off-track with the idea of salvation through psychedelics,
for which they were kicked out of Harvard. There was a media
blitz; they had centers in Millbrook, New York, and in Zijuatenejo
for a summer and a half, Tim Leary's group, the IFIF, and
traveling psychedelics shows -- all of it outraging the
establishment and scaring Sandoz silly.
On December 2, 1965, The New England Journal of Medicine
published an editorial under the title, "LSD -- A Dangerous Drug",
which ignored the entire body of published data, including the
report of our first Macy Foundation Conference on "The Use of LSD
in Psychotherapy" and went on to say "...today there is no published
evidence that further experimentation is likely to yield
invaluable data." Incredible for the outstanding medical journal
in the US to so ignore facts!
W. McGlothlin in the first paper of the Conference, "Social
and Para-Medical Aspects of Hallucinogenic Drugs" had written:
"...The purpose of the present paper is to provide a
perspective on the long-term effects and social implications of
the protracted use of hallucinogenic drugs through a review of the
extensive literature on peyote and cannabis sativa (marihuana)...
Since hallucinogens are known to have been in use for over four
thousand years, there is no need to restrict our data to the very
limited information available on the uncontrolled use of the more
recent additions to the hallucinogen family...There are many other
hallucinogens that have been used to alter mental states, but only
peyote and cannabis are sufficiently well-documented for the
purposes of this paper."
In other words, peyote and marijuana -- over the centuries -
were found to be safe, non-addicting, and consciousness-changing.
During the discussion of this yeoman review of W. McGlothlin, he
said:
"...There is a fair amount of LSD and other hallucinogens being
taken under unsupervised conditions, in this country at least, and
there is every indication that this use will accelerate rather
than drop off. There is a lot of speculation about what the
various adverse social and medical effects are that might result
from this... I think we know quite a bit; I mean, we can
supplement a limited knowledge on the social use of LSD simply by
looking at some of these older drugs, such as peyote and
cannabis...The other point is that I think the attitude many of us
take about misuse is to some extent erroneous...Most of these
people, as I say, however ill-advised you may feel that it is, are
nevertheless genuinely interested in taking it because they think
it will in some way benefit them in a lasting way. I think it
well to understand that many people dismiss the whole issue as
related to a group of people who are just interested in kicks and
cults. And I think that is not quite correct."
Every paper, every participant had something to add to the
general knowledge out of his or her own experience. And what a
variety of methods, environments, adjuncts, sessions! But the
results were there for anyone and everyone to see and to assess.
As I have mentioned, that lengthy report of our Conference, so
laboriously put together by Harold Abramson, contains the
distilled knowledge from lifetimes of work with psychedelics.
When once again society sees fit to use psychedelics for healing
and for knowledge, this book might well serve as an operational
text, written by people who were there and who lived and worked
it, themselves, to achieve the outstanding results described.
******************
There was only one more conference -- and it didn't happen.
The European Psycholytic Congress was due to meet in Prague,
Czechoslovakia the end of September, 1968. Dr. Milan Hausner had
invited me to give a paper, and I was going to report on our
Ritalin work. The title of the paper was "Observations on the
Psychotherapeutic Use of Ritalin Alone and in Combination with
LSD, Carbogen and Other Drugs". I had carefully culled all of our
work with Ritalin, adding the use with LSD (which produced
dramatic, ego-shattering results) at the request of Dr. Hausner.
The organizing committee wanted LSD, which was still in use in
some places in Europe, to have a place in the papers.
It was to be quite a trip to Europe: first, the placing of my
two children, Maleah and David, and C.L.'s daughter, R., in school
in Paris. C.L. was to stay in Paris for at least three months to
make sure that the three of them were settled with respect to
board and studies. Meanwhile, W.M. (whom I had married in Mexico
and then again in Las Vegas, just to make sure) and I were going
to attend the Congress and hope for a reunion of all of the old
researchers: Ron Sandison, Stanya Grof, Cornelius Van Rhijn, Willi
Arendsen-Hein, and whoever else was there.
Alas, the news began to worsen before we left Santa Monica;
in fact, we felt that it was necessary to make alternate plans to
visit the Greek Islands if the Russian-provoked turmoil did not
abate. As the news got worse and worse, our hearts became heavier
and heavier. And our forebodings were justified. In August,
Russian tanks moved into Czechoslovakia.
"The European Psycholytic Congress" never was held. The use
of LSD was to be eliminated in Europe, too, with the exception of
Holland. There one man, Dr. Jan Bastiaans, used LSD to help
rehabilitate concentration camp survivors and victims of
hijacking, torture, and hostage-taking from 1961 to 1988 when he
reached mandatory retirement age. Films showing his work are
heart-wrenching.
At about this time, Swiss psychiatrists were becoming
interested, and in the 1980's, LSD, MDMA and psilocybin were
allowed in Switzerland for psychiatric treatment. Today Dr. Peter
Baumann, President of the Swiss Association of physicians for
Psycholytic Therapy, and six other psychiatrists are licensed to
treat patients with these substances. May their tribe increase!
And may the good word spread again into all of the countries, and
the psychedelics regain their rightful status as outstanding aids
to psychotherapy and extraordinary research tools.
Today in 2002, hopefully, we see small indications of growth
in the use of psychedelics. Certainly in Europe, and especially
in Switzerland, an increasing number of psychiatrists are using
LSD, psilocybin and MDMA to help patients, and to shorten the
course of therapy. There are indications that in Germany and
Holland, psychiatrists may soon be able to use LSD to help their
patients. Even in the US, there are initial applications to the
FDA for the use of MDMA and LSD. It is possible that the climate
against the psychedelics is about to change.
Thirty years ago it was just the opposite situation: the
curtain was beginning to come down on psychedelics, eliminating
the healing and research we had done with these drugs -- all of
the exciting discoveries -- all of the ferment of a wide spectrum
of research into the unconscious.
Coming events began to cast their shadow earlier, just as
some of the most creative and brilliant work was being done with
LSD. First came the attack on any of us who were not boarded
psychiatrists. The following is from my letter of April 11, 1961,
written to Humphry Osmond in two sections on my return from the
successful London Royal Medico-Psychological Conference; this
part dated April 24, 1961:
"Briefly, while we were gone, the hospital put in a Medical
Director -- something new. When I got back and went to give LSD,
the arrangements for which had been made the day before at the
hospital, they said no more LSD. And me with my patient there.
The head nurse and admitting office stood by me and admitted the
patient. The Medical Director called and tried to make me leave
the hospital after the patient had the drug in him! I naturally
refused and asked if he wanted to have the patient's stomach
pumped."
"The reason he gave for no more LSD was that his personal
malpractice insurance doesn't cover him against experimental drugs
used at the hospital! When I questioned this, he said he didn't
want to discuss details with me. Then he privately told Marion
Dakin (and rumored it around the hospital) that he was going to
get all Ph.D.s out of the hospital. There were several of us
using LSD under Marion Dakin. He tried to kick her out of the
hospital too, but she just laughed at him and pointed out that he
had given me no notification (he kicked me out), but that had
nothing to do with her. Further, Harry Althouse (Sandoz'
representative) who supplies LSD to the whole western region told
Mike (Agron, SF psychiatrist) that he was going to see that every
clinical psychologist (Ph.D.) was taken out of drug work. He just
allows psychiatrists with boards -- the main one being the one who
caused all the scandals and gave LSD such a bad name; and for six
months I begged Harry to come down and see what was going on, and
he refused to. It took letters from both Marion and Sid (and Sid
wouldn't write for months) to get him down, and then I think since
they didn't specify, that he thought it was something with respect
to me that he was to investigate. Anyway, he has told Marion that
we can't have any more drug until we have a psychiatrist who puts
the pills in the patient's mouth. This he has been kidded about
until he says that maybe they don't have to put the pill in their
mouth, but they have to supervise us. He wants to get rid of
Marion and have a psychiatrist. Which is absolutely mad because
one needs a complete physical with a competent internist most of
all for LSD work from the medical side. And there isn't a
psychiatrist in LA who can "supervise" with respect to the work we
are doing because we know a great deal more about the drug than
they do. It must be a time for me to stop a lot of work and write
-- certainly work has been made almost impossible for me lately by
forces utterly beyond my control. It is very discouraging to be
doing really sincere work and to be hampered on every side..."
And from earlier in the letter:
"It was particularly disheartening to come straight from the
London Conference where everyone was so nice, and England where
LSD isn't a nasty word, right back into the worst prohibitions,
restrictions, and real bias. Well, there are always such times.
I, personally, have had to give up work with LSD three separate
times (when the research with Sid ended, when I temporarily had to
stop doing therapy because of Will, and between M.D.'s), and each
time a way has opened so that I did not need to. But now I am
tired... and I don't think I have the strength to fight the damn
thing any more. I know it's always this way when one is working
on the frontiers of the new, but it is doubly hard when there is
the additional prejudice of the medical profession -- and
unfortunately the prejudice against me as a woman. I hate to have
to say that, but that is part of it, too..."
Humphry answered me immediately, April 27, l961 -- with
support:
"...Let's come to first things first. I agree with you that
professional prejudice (in this case psychiatric) is one aspect of
the matter. Psychiatrists in the US have for so long emphasized
that psychiatry is psychotherapy that they have begun to believe
this themselves. Mind you, they have been aided and abetted by
psychologists and sociologists who have fallen for this same
argument...The present wrangling is idiotic and sordid because it
means that we are prepared to rid ourselves of your remarkable
knowledge simply because we are inflexible and silly... I can't
believe that the answer to this is your getting a medical degree -
- just another bizarre answer to the simple question of thinking
more clearly. I also agree about the sex prejudice. I've always
liked to think this wasn't so, because I was brought up by 2
Scotch aunts who clearly weren't inferior to men and live with my
3 girls who are as sharp as pins. I can't maintain these
illusions...It is hard to realize that women are and have been the
largest single depressed and exploited group of humans in the
world...Then you are very intelligent, and intelligence of whatever
sex isn't welcome, but has to be put up with..."
And from my reply of May 15, 1961:
"...First I want to tell you about the burning of Aldous
Huxley's house, which made us all absolutely sick. It happened
Friday night, and we were at L.A.'s and could see it happening
just one ridge over. We didn't know it was Deronda Drive; we did
know that it was violent, magnificent, fast-moving, very
destructive, and that we weren't going to leave L.A.'s until we
were sure that it wouldn't go over the intervening ridge to hers..."
"Thanks for your offer to `do' something for me; I hadn't
intended to ask you anything like that. I just needed your moral
support...As to the local situation, I'm in the process of trying to
find a psychiatrist who will `supervise' our project. You'd be
surprised how hard that is, as there is such a prejudice against
LSD here in LA. Understandable in a way became of all the fringe
operations, and also because we are a bastion of psychoanalysis...
Marion Dakin has found a little sanatorium not far from the
hospital which will take us grudgingly if they happen to have a
room open...I have the feeling that this is the time for me to slow
down work-wise -- and to write, but so far it hasn't worked that
way because extra time has gone into finishing the house, taking
extra time with DB, and other odd jobs that I haven't had time for
many months..."
But the situation didn't apply just to me and to
psychologists. We were just the first to be under attack. Hy
Denber wrote on November 2, 1962:
"...How has the current hubbub regarding LSD affected your
work? I heard at a recent meeting in New York that Sandoz would
no longer furnish the drug for anything else except animal
experimentation. As a matter of fact, when I saw Dr. Bircher
yesterday at a meeting in the city, I mentioned it to him and his
reply was `for animal work only' We were told that Sandoz was no
longer interested (I also heard that their patent has run out and
this is probably why they have no further interest). It also was
said that people were smuggling the stuff in from Europe in
letters). As a matter of fact, there is a very curious trend
going on in psychiatry at the moment -- anti-drug; and it is being
aided and abetted by the same powers that were screaming about the
virtues of drugs not too long ago..."
From my letter of January 12, 1963 to Hy:
"...You indeed had heard truly about LSD and no more for
distribution clinically. I understand some of the animal work has
been brought to an end, too. Fortunately, this friend of mine,
who admires my work, had bought quite a batch and will transfer it
to my MD and me along with the FDA papers so that I can go on
working."
From a letter to Humphry, dated March 5, 1963
"...As for me, there is a new doctor in colleaguery on the
research; the onus of LSD just got too much for Marion Dakin to
carry. It has been pretty bad out here, but I've tried to keep
working quietly. I have sworn off any papers in local, or
psychological associations or meetings on my work, as it is just
too unpleasant. I finally consented to discuss the research for
my LA colleagues in clinical society (Sid Cohen and Murray
Korngold were on the program, too), and the first man jumped up
and said he didn't know anything about this, but it had to stop.
That week I had a letter (as did all people working with
`psychoactive drugs' asking my fees, my M.D., my problems, my
private life history, etc. I wrote back wearily, saying that
colleagues were supposed to support and not to harass; that my
work was on record at the meeting where I spoke and in various
publications; it was on record on the tapes of all my patients,
and that I welcomed observers who really wanted to know. I have
heard nothing further. You shouldn't take this too seriously; I
really am much happier about the whole thing than it would appear.
It's just that with Oscar Janiger going into a mental slump and
cutting out for England, Tim Leary having the rug pulled out from
under him at Harvard and setting out for Mexico, the big stink
about your place in Menlo Park, etc., etc. It all just seems so
unnecessary..."
And a letter to Hy, dated March 14, 1963:
"...Being a leper and a pariah in the community, I have become
more or less accustomed to it with allied disciplines, but I found
it hard to swallow when one of my own societies invited me to
speak on LSD, nay, begged, almost blackmailed; and when I did,
there was a letter the following week to all workers in drugs with
snide questions from the Head of the Ethics Committee.
Incidentally, I was on the program with Sid -- or did I tell you?
Have been seeing quite a bit of him; he is very busy, at times
seems tired, but has the most extraordinarily penetrating mind and
the best knowledge of LSD in these here parts. What a pleasure to
read his contributions to Coughlan's article in the current LIFE
on LSD. I thought the two-part article on the brain and control
of behavior was excellent. I now have a favorite part of the
brain that I beam all the focus of my energy on when I'm using one
of our new non-verbal techniques, the amygdala. I have a hunch
that the crossed wires, love-hate and black-white, is set in here
or in the neighborhood. Interesting to see and take a patient
through this point of uncrossing the wires..."
And Saturday, June 22, 1963, again to Hy:
"...I'm not worried about drugs. During the long drought we
had to get used to working with other drugs. Haven't you heard
about Ipomea tricolor, the morning glories? Oliliuqui, and works
fine for groups. Also, I've found that present-day patients move
as far and as fast with IM Ritalin as earlier patients did on
small doses of LSD. We've tried just about every drug in the
book, the group and I have...and lots of the time we can go pretty
far without anything at all. There seems definitely to be a
learning process with hallucinogens -- one which can be extended
to the bringing of unconscious processes to awareness without any
drugs at all..."
"As to the attacks on LSD, they've been there right along.
I've been very fortunate in that all the people who got off the
track were reluctant to quote me as one of the sources for their
research; thus I missed all the mess that the blowing up of
Hartman and Chandler spread around in print. Also, last November,
when Tim Leary was out, I felt him getting off the track and very
quickly disengaged; I've never given IFIF money, and I wouldn't
have a group of people in to meet him when he was here just after
Easter. Sid and I have been predicting that he would get into
trouble in Mexico; we have a couple more we think are going to be
in trouble before too long. Which doesn't leave many of us left.
Sid and I have taken to shaking our head while looking at each
other and wondering when or which of us will be next. Now it
won't be easy, working with those drugs; but it never has been.
There was a man out from NIMH not long ago, and he felt there had
been a shift toward LSD with them (Cole less anti, etc.). All of
this was before Tim and Dick shot up the national magazines with
their movement to expand consciousness, however. Well, no one
said it would be easy, and I'm sure it could be worse, but
actually it has seemed better for me since I'm working very
quietly out of the main stream."
"As to the home front, it has been very rough. Just because
I don't write about it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I just
think it's a bore to keep having the same problems. It will be
better when Will finds a job; nine months of "looking" is wearing
on all concerned...The kids are in wonderful shape. They were
disappointed about our European trip falling through, but we are
hoping to go to Tahiti in August...to meet my brother, who will be
coming back stateside from Manila on his way to a post in Panama.
Maleah finished elementary school this year; DB did wonderfully in
his research class...It will be a little rough if Will comes up with
a job outside of the LA area -- hard enough on the family, but it
would be tragic for him to have to leave his analyst -- the first
one who has really helped him. No point in solving problems
before they are presented, however..."
July 2, 1963 to Hy:
"...Ogden...I don't know who the man is; I am enclosing my reply
to him. I don't think I really intend to send him anything; he
came on the heels of a man from Saturday Evening Post whom I tried
to avoid and finally had to see because he had dinner with the
Fadimans and A. is an old friend of mine from college days and put
him onto me after Sid had, too. What I'm trying to say in a
round-about way is that he tried to engage me in controversy --
first with statements of Rinkel and Hoch; then he tried to pump me
for movie names with LSD; then he tried to catch me about my
operational situation. When he found I give LSD in the hospital
and work always under an MD, he was very surprised and lost
interest...I guess what I'm trying to say is that I'm sick to death
of people making capital on LSD and in the name of wanting to do
an `honest and fair' article -- or a `book' trying to start fights
or whatever they are trying to do. I had fun writing the letter
to Ogden; I particularly like the part about the cow. You
probably don't approve, but what the heck, I have to have my fun
someplace..."
Humphry Osmond worried about Tim Leary; May 26, 1963 letter:
My Dear Betty:
"...Have got some LSD groups going with alcoholics -- quite
simple affairs because we have to get our people interested before
elaborating. Straight-forward goals of stopping drinking and
joining AA. We can do more refined work later on. Am concerned
about Tim Leary, but have found it hard to maintain contact with
him, and since much work has to be done, have left his affairs
alone lately. Tim failed to get an adequate adviser on
psychopharmacology and has acted as if these powerful chemicals,
many of whose actions are still obscure, were harmless toys. They
aren't. In grave illnesses like alcoholism, they may be harmless
relative to the likely outcome, which is something different."
In 1962 and 1963, Sid Cohen began to have tremors about LSD,
and published several papers warning about the growing misuse of
the drug. One of the articles dealt with nine cases of adverse
reactions to LSD and predicted that as the use of LSD spread,
there would be more difficulties. He advocated "responsible"
therapists and the use of the drug in hospitals where there could
be maximum protection for the patients. However, in June of 1963,
a law giving the FDA control over all new investigational drugs
went into effect. Passed in the summer of 1962, and aimed at
amphetamine abuse, the outcome of the bill was that all research
with experimental drugs would have to be cleared through the FDA.
And in the fall of 1962, agents of the FDA made the rounds of
investigators and requested the remaining supplies of their drug.
They didn't come to me, but I wasn't a principal investigator.
However, in the meantime our group work had shown the
efficacy of using Ritalin in place of the low-dose LSD. No
hospitalization was necessary with the Ritalin, and the patient
could get a shot in Dr. Dakin's office and walk the half block to
mine. We had also begun to use the Ritalin in conjunction with
what we called body work, or deep massage, which appeared to
remove psychological problems when used in conjunction with
Ritalin. After Dr. Dakin found the supervising of three of us who
used Ritalin too difficult, Dr. Maynard Brandsma stepped into the
breach -- he was the executives' doctor at the RAND Corp. -- and
was our supervising doctor. But the work with LSD was less and
less, and the negative publicity was growing stronger by the
month.
Dr. William Frosch's report of the increasing number of
psychotic admissions to Belleview appeared in 1965, along with
other local, and usually exaggerated, reports of the difficulties
of people who had ingested LSD. All this time Tim Leary1, Dick
Alpert and Ralph Metzger were extolling its benefits and shouting
the chorus of "Turn on! Tune in! Drop Out!" And Ken Kesey and his
1Letter from Humphry, March 31, 1992: "...Where both Al (Hubbard) and Aldous
disagreed with Timothy Leary was that they believed that he had got the time
scale wrong, and that the US had a much greater inertia then he supposed. They
both believed for quite different reasons that working inconspicuously but
determinedly within the system could transform it in the long run. Timothy
believed that it could be taken by storm. Hindsight is so much easier than
foresight..."From my April 6, 1992 reply: "...You didn't say so, but I couldn't
agree with you more than that LSD is a religious drug, a growth drug, an
initiation drug, and the best aid we have to enhance spiritual growth. To say
nothing of it being the ideal teaching drug for psychiatry -- or the best
method, let alone drug. But of course Timmy Leary stopped all that with his
wild campaign. Both Al and Aldous were right in that the work should have
proceeded quietly and from within to change people and, through people, our very
Merry Pranksters were font page news doing just that and more. It
was about that time that Ken got into legal trouble; Tim Leary's
trouble came a little later.
In March of 1966 Time magazine reported that the US was
suffering from an LSD epidemic. By June both California and
Nevada had legislated against LSD, and by October, LSD was illegal
in the whole country. All this was too much for Sandoz, which had
been taking an increasing amount of flack because of LSD and
psilocybin, and in April of 1966, Sandoz terminated all research
contracts involved with the two drugs and indicated their
willingness to turn over all their supplies to the FDA. For 26
years there was no more legal psychedelic research in the United
States.
But that didn't mean that the use of LSD came to an end.
There was a flood of black market drugs, and it seemed that
everyone, especially on campuses and in the Haight Ashbury
district of San Francisco, was into "expanding consciousness" or
tripping out. The high point, for the "flower children", who came
to be known as "hippies", was in June of 1966 when 20,000 people,
in a haze and daze of love and good feelings, took part in the
First Human Be-In at the Polo Field in San Francisco. The
situation could only go downhill from there -- it having been
steeply downhill already for those of us who were interested in
sick society. But Tim had too much 'show biz' in his nature to allow him to
pursue such a reasonable and gradual approach..."
and trying desperately to do scientific research with psychedelics
and allied drugs.
**********
It has been a long time, and many researchers went under the
bridge or into the river or just retreated quietly to the shore.
Today, however, it appears that there is a changing attitude. In
September of 1992, the first study was approved by NIDA of the
FDA, a preliminary study examining dosage (!) and then for use on
liver cancer patients. Meanwhile, LSD work never entirely ceased
in Europe: In England it was used for several years longer than
in the US, in Holland Dr. Ian Bastiaans until just recently,
successfully used LSD on concentration camp victims, and in
Switzerland, five doctors have been licensed for the therapeutic
use of LSD with patients, and two more are about to join them. In
the intervening years, it was only in our acting-out United States
that its use with patients had to be totally prohibited, thanks to
the giant circus made around its extraordinary effects -- and also
thanks probably to the fibers of our Puritan background, fibers
which have been forged into cables by the religious right.
But during this period of no LSD, psilocybin or mescaline,
Ritalin was working well for us, and after Lee Sanella taught
Ernie Katz and me to work with Ritalin and carbogen for the really
recalcitrant problem areas, we were managing to change people's
character structure almost as well as with LSD and sometimes even
better.
And then Ciba removed injectable Ritalin from the market
because of abuse on the streets! It was a terrible blow to us,
and wiped out the work on core problems. Although by this time we
had learned about rolfing and had seen how its deep-tissue body
work could remove long-buried traumas and other problem areas.
But it wasn't enough; we needed a drug which could relax the
tightly-held controls of the individual so that deep letting go
could occur.
In February of 1974, my husband, W.M., was in Mexico, and he
heard about and then experienced a brand new drug: ketamine.
We first heard about ketamine when we were in Mexico for
Christmas, 1973. Ketamine is a very safe anesthetic drug, being
safe for children and pregnant women. When used in amounts one-
third the anesthetic dosage, patients have access to unconscious
material which is otherwise unavailable, making possible the
abreaction of early traumatic events and putting the individual in
touch with suppressed or repressed feelings and memories. All of
this we were to discover subsequently, but meanwhile, we heard
that Dr. Salvador Roquet was doing extensive work with ketamine,
datura and LSD at his Instituto de Psicosintesis in Mexico City.
We knew several people who had been there, and I had later heard
Dr. Roquet speak and saw his films at the house of a colleague in
Hollywood. W.M. went to Mexico City in February of 1974 to
experience datura, but was given ketamine instead, and had an
amazing experience with Dr. Salvador Roquet. He was able to buy
some of the drug, sold at the local farmacia under the name of
Ketalar.
Meanwhile I had told Dr. Katz about ketamine, and we began a
review of the literature, focusing especially on those articles
which dealt with any psychiatric aspects of the drug. At this
time, he found an article in Psychosomatics (Khorradzadeh, E. and
Lotfy A.O., The use of ketamine in psychiatry, Psychosomatics,
XIV: November-December 1973, 344-346) about the actual therapeutic
use of the drug successfully with 100 mental patients in Iran.
It was the end of May when Ernie injected me with a small
dose, 40 mg. intramuscularly of ketamine, and I went through a
period of imagery, insights and problems for about 45 minutes. I
felt that here was a most valuable tool for access to the
unconscious. Shortly after that we tried a low dose on four
members of the research group, and a few days later, Ernie had 50
mg. IM himself.
We all felt that we had found our therapeutic drug -- one
which worked much like LSD but more concentrated and for a much
shorter duration of time. In fact, in listing the benefits of
ketamine, eight were mentioned: l. the ability to enable
abreaction; 2. access to feelings; 3. access to the unconscious
and the ability to deal with problems which is not usually
available; 4. relaxation of deep characterological tension; 5.
recapitulation of levels of psychosexual development; 6. ability
to regress; 7. resolution of relationship difficulties; and 8.
unusual insight.
Dr. Katz soon switched to intravenous injections because
ketamine is more effective at lesser doses and for a shorter
duration of time when given intravenously. Dosages ranged from 10
to 55 mg. of ketamine, depending on the body weight of the
patient, with the patient lying on a thick foam rubber pad and
covered by a blanket. If there is an abreactive experience (very
common) it usually helps to have people holding the patients hands
or arms, or even lying on them. We found with work at a deep
unconscious level that there is a feeling of security and
reassurance and support to proceed through the difficult work when
there is body contact. Further, we found that the presence of an
individual lying on top of the patient helps prevent schizoid
dissociation.
The active period of the drug varied from five to twenty
minutes, and it is during this period that strong abreactions
occur (when there are repressed traumatic events to be
discharged). This active period, during which a patient may slip
over into unconsciousness but very rarely does, is followed by a
period of creative rumination during which insights, intuitions,
images and feelings occur. This insightful, creative rumination
period may last from half an hour to three hours, and is
characterized by the patient lying quietly with eyes closed,
occasionally asking a question or responding to some stimulus in
the environment. Music is played during all of the session
(usually a Mozart Concerto) because music was found to be useful
in helping the patient "let go".
During this ruminative period, rolf-type or deep massage was
used if the patient requested it. The body work is very helpful
in releasing blocks to the expression of feelings, and is helpful
in "draining" material which manifests itself as bodily pain. We
found in the many years that we worked at deep level therapy with
character disorders that many of the problems are set into the
body and that psychological change follows body work. The rolf
technique is particularly helpful to patients with psychological
problems. (I very commonly referred a new patient for the rolf
series, along with a session "structuring" their life patterns.
Frequently, at the end of these series, the presenting problem was
solved.)
The work with ketamine was extremely successful and lasted
from June, 1974 through June, 1978. There were 563 separate
ketamine sessions; some patients had just one; many had a number
of sessions. Ketamine was found by us to be the ideal drug for
abreacting trauma, helping people let go of controls, and dealing
with character disorders. It is a shame that it is no longer used
for that purpose or to help people who want to effect basic
change.
Let's hope that this situation is only temporary, and
ketamine will come to assume the valuable role which it can so
effectively fulfill.
*******************
Change must be implemented by translation into everyday
action; LSD sessions can remove trauma, change perception and
clear the slate, so to speak. But then changed habit patterns
must be initiated (embedded) and sustained so that deep basic
change can take place.
The human being is an odd combination of past, present and
future -- of perceptions, biases and character structure. To
change this ponderous (for an adult) and complicated entity into
creative and sustained growth toward fulfillment of potential is a
combination of clarity of perception and continual and continuing
action in the direction of that growth.
Perception grows by implementation -- and is rarely a magical
act of complete transformation for the foreseeable future (except,
perhaps, in the cases of saints, sages and sometimes mad people).